By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
The owner of Hostgator has changed and I think their response time has increased. Is there any web hosting better than Hostgator that has better response time and is more responsive?
I'd recommend one of these three hosters which are all owned by the Host Europe Group:
http://www.heartinternet.co.uk/
https://www.123-reg.co.uk/
http://www.webfusion.co.uk/
However, hosting companies tend to change their prices, level of service, speed, general level of quality quite a lot in my opinion. So it's best to re-evaluate from time to time. Anyone else thinks so too?
Best,
Uwe
Isn't extendCP based on cPanel?
I think most basic users of webhosting don't really care whether they use cPanel, eXtendCP, Confixx, Plesk or any of the other admin tools...Maybe I am wrong?
The owner of Hostgator has changed and I think their response time has increased. Is there any web hosting better than Hostgator that has better response time and is more responsive?
Thinking about it, I am probably not the best person to actually make such a comment as I've been using my own dedicated servers and a bunch of hobby/testing virtual servers for the last ten years. Can't remember when I actually got an out-of-the-box web hosting package. I just assumed that there are users like me (e.g. using SSH, maybe webmin, but not CPanel, etc.) or users who don't care about the admin interface as long as it is simple to create email addressesWell I'm not saying you're wrong, but many have told me they don't like how you can't easily transfer away from providers using custom control panels (HeartInternet, BlueHost, HostMonster) etc.
Haha...yeah just thought about that one. I once had a virtual server for playing around and learning some stuff and it had Plesk...Wasn't too impressed with it eitherI wouldn't wish Plesk on my worst enemy.
Haha...yeah just thought about that one. I once had a virtual server for playing around and learning some stuff and it had Plesk...Wasn't too impressed with it either![]()
I am just wondering, but where do all the smaller web hosting companies here on UKBF get their servers from? Are you just renting from the big guys and then putting your own systems + customer service + marketing on top? Or are you actually owning the hardware and renting space in the data centers?
I am just wondering, but where do all the smaller web hosting companies here on UKBF get their servers from? Are you just renting from the big guys and then putting your own systems + customer service + marketing on top? Or are you actually owning the hardware and renting space in the data centers?
Let's say anything from 1-300 customers might be small. Obviously 300 customers as in website of a local plumber or electrician and not 300 x Facebook/Twitter/UKBF
I understand that it's not too hard (assuming you've got knowledge as a server admin) to rent a server from a web hosting company, such as yours Matt, and install the required admin tools, cpanel, whatever...But how do these smaller hosting companies and web designers offer domain names to their customers? This clearly is harder to do as you need to be working with all the different domain registrars? And if they just get the domain name from GoDaddy or Hostgator and re-sell them, then 1. you are more expensive then the competition and 2. you would easily see that when doing a WHOIS search....
Yes there are, and they tend to be the more discerning people who gravitate to hosts like Bytemark who can cater for them properly...... I just assumed that there are users like me (e.g. using SSH, maybe webmin, but not CPanel, etc.)
I happen to think the only decent host in the world is Google and for itself. lol
I believe Google have a virtual cloud service in the making, more so a direct competitor to AWS. Google are already rolling out IS with 1gb connectivity in the US. Watch this space![]()
its not just about the company...if you purchase shared hosting from 123reg and then dedicated server from Hostgator, of course you would say Hostgator has better response time and is a better hosting company. So, for a better and more expensive package, any company would deliver quality.
I'd recommend one of these three hosters which are all owned by the Host Europe Group:
http://www.heartinternet.co.uk/
https://www.123-reg.co.uk/
http://www.webfusion.co.uk/
However, hosting companies tend to change their prices, level of service, speed, general level of quality quite a lot in my opinion. So it's best to re-evaluate from time to time. Anyone else thinks so too?
Best,
Uwe
Well it is not always easy to keep the same level of service / response times as a company grows. Hosting companies grow, daily tickets increase, support teams increase and more issues arise.
We're growing rapidly and are also non-stop hiring and training new techs because of it, deployed new monitoring systems, new spam filtering systems etc just to keep the quality of our services as high as possible.
You should surely give ipage a try. For me they are even better than hostgator.
It's also not difficult.
Don't overload servers (and get greedy - we all know more accounts per server yields more short term profit)
Don't cheap out on underspecc'd servers
Plan ahead. Have a hiring plan. Have procedures in place to bring in new staff and ramp up shifts / ramp down shifts for particularly busy periods
Automate
It does require a lot more thinking than the traditional buy 1 dedicated server become a hosting company puts in. But that is a good thing.