The Apprentice winner in employment tribunal...

  • Thread starter Thread starter Suzuki
  • Start date Start date
She is a celebrity now ,they don't have to work.;)

Pretty sure she has already earnt far more than any job would have paid her.:)


https://www.google.co.uk/search?q=s...HwDQ&biw=939&bih=561&sei=HlFsUfxosNrRBcz5gNAP

Earl as someone who works in seo as a full time job, you should know better than anyone to post that nonsense.

How does a lot of google image searches translate into earnings? They're all from her failed attempt at extorting money from Sugar via this silly employment claim.

I doubt she's rich or she wouldn't have been on that game show in the first place. And she's now certainly unemployable. So off to the dole queue for her I guess...
 
Upvote 0
was wondering what she is up to after watching an old apprentice episode.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ms-just-90-bank-marriage-work-reputation.html

Looks like she lost and had to cough up Lord Sugar's expenses which put her in a financial strin and has to pay 4 grand a month for pr work. It's the daily mail so expect a bit of hyperbole.

My gut instinct is that she;s made one bad decision after another, clearly she's not a businesswoman and could do diddly squat with her exposure in the media. A businesswoman would know when to cut their losses and not pursue a lost cause.

Typical loser who feels sorry for themselves and can't make their own fortunes. a true business person would see opportunity not squander their position on lost causes. A true businessperson doens't need a job - they can generate money without needing to be employed.
 
Upvote 0
You wouldn't think high profile figures like herself would need to be employable when she more than likely has what it takes to go self employed and build up her own business.
clearly not. shes claiming shes unemployable and considering getting on job seekers and housing benefit.
 
Upvote 0
One wonders how much the papers are paying her for her story.

"any publicity is good publicity";)

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbi...-drives-40k-Range-Rover-weeks-signing-on.html

Honestly, i dont think she'll be impressed by the DM article I put up earlier. That just makes them a whino and someone who is willing to take you (employer) in an employment tribunal over nonsensical cases. Such as someone who is likely to contact HR over a "misplaced" stapler from her desk.

That earlier article (which she was probably paid for) makes her look quite bad.

I'm guessing the later "article" is probably unpaid as it looks like she was spooked on by paparazzi. Goes to show what DM is about. One minute they'll give you a paid spot next minute they're spying on you.
 
Upvote 0

Latest Articles