By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
You might want to look up "fraud", HM Revenue and Customs, and the Organised Crime unit.
You can not, under any circumstances sell these goods.
Just to be clear here, I have no intention of selling counterfeit goods. I am arguing against those (on another forum) who claim that there's no problem (morally or legally) if someone sells counterfeit goods while telling people that they're counterfeit.
Just to be clear here, I have no intention of selling counterfeit goods. I am arguing against those (on another forum) who claim that there's no problem (morally or legally) if someone sells counterfeit goods while telling people that they're counterfeit.
To the original question - isn't counterfeiting to do with intent to deceive and defraud?
If that's the case, then wouldn't it mean that by saying goods are counterfeit means they aren't?
Also, what is the difference between counterfeit goods, and copies?
MoK
Then I think you misunderstood my post. There is no difference between counterfeit and copies (if by copy you mean an exact copy of an existing product). Just two different words to describe the same thing.Thank you - you've answered for me the question of the difference between counterfeit and copies.
I was struggling with the issue of copying, which I know is a legitimate practice, but doesn't involve the use of a trademark.