- Original Poster
- #1
Hi all,
Sorry if this is in the wrong section, I had no idea where to put it and this seemed as good a place as any.
So I'm a web designer, a freelancer. I'm good at what I do but I want a more stable income. I have times where I am very comfortable and I have times where I am on my arse! I'm not the greatest with money either which does not help but we all have flaws. :redface:
Rather than take each job as it comes I am considering build websites on a 'rent a site' model. The website remains mine, you pay say £20 a month for a 2 year contract. The content is yours and it can be changed at any time you like and I provide video training on how to do this.
Depending on what tarrif you are on you get a certain amount of support time where you can get me to change anything you like, if you need more support time you can buy more credits for any particular month.
If you want extras such as SEO, PPC advice, social media artwork or other graphic design you can use the credits to sort this. Things like SEO will be added into the different packages and tarrifs.
The websites are mine which means they are looked after and maintained by me and will not go down. This keeps clients from playing with databases and the such or changing URL's and wondering why things no longer work.
Cost wise for me it's no different to what I do now just the money I get is spread over 2 years rather than I get it now. £20 a month is what I want to try and keep it around with a 2 year deal and that would total £480 for a website, hosting, domain, 1 hour support a month and the knowledge that someone is there looking down on you like a guardian angel.
The websites are custom designed like I do now and at the end of the 2 years I redesign again and we carry on (hopefully!
)
I'm wondering is this sort of model going to work for businesses? Would you be more likely to get a website or redesign your website if you knew you could pay it off over 2 years rather than pay the money in 1 lump?
Is there an ultimate flaw in the plan I have overlooked?
I would love some feedback on this!
Thanks
Steve
Sorry if this is in the wrong section, I had no idea where to put it and this seemed as good a place as any.
So I'm a web designer, a freelancer. I'm good at what I do but I want a more stable income. I have times where I am very comfortable and I have times where I am on my arse! I'm not the greatest with money either which does not help but we all have flaws. :redface:
Rather than take each job as it comes I am considering build websites on a 'rent a site' model. The website remains mine, you pay say £20 a month for a 2 year contract. The content is yours and it can be changed at any time you like and I provide video training on how to do this.
Depending on what tarrif you are on you get a certain amount of support time where you can get me to change anything you like, if you need more support time you can buy more credits for any particular month.
If you want extras such as SEO, PPC advice, social media artwork or other graphic design you can use the credits to sort this. Things like SEO will be added into the different packages and tarrifs.
The websites are mine which means they are looked after and maintained by me and will not go down. This keeps clients from playing with databases and the such or changing URL's and wondering why things no longer work.
Cost wise for me it's no different to what I do now just the money I get is spread over 2 years rather than I get it now. £20 a month is what I want to try and keep it around with a 2 year deal and that would total £480 for a website, hosting, domain, 1 hour support a month and the knowledge that someone is there looking down on you like a guardian angel.
The websites are custom designed like I do now and at the end of the 2 years I redesign again and we carry on (hopefully!
I'm wondering is this sort of model going to work for businesses? Would you be more likely to get a website or redesign your website if you knew you could pay it off over 2 years rather than pay the money in 1 lump?
Is there an ultimate flaw in the plan I have overlooked?
I would love some feedback on this!
Thanks
Steve
