Upvote
0
By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
Nothing personal, but I just hate anything MicroSoft, it goes back a long way but may be rooted in the thought that MS effectively invented viruses through the creation of fundamentally flawed operating system design.
The point to remember is that if you are sending documents electronically to a client you should generate them using the same application that the recipient will use to view them.
But MS Office produces such ugly documents full of formatting problems. I would rather work in Simpletext or Textedit for quick drafts and then import into a proper DTP programme for final presentation and then convert to PDF.The moral of the story is that if you create documents that represent you and you care about your customer's perception of your image and services don't cut corners to save a few quid. It can backfire.
But MS Office produces such ugly documents full of formatting problems. I would rather work in Simpletext or Textedit for quick drafts and then import into a proper DTP programme for final presentation and then convert to PDF.
...if you are sending documents electronically to a client you should generate them using the same application that the recipient will use to view them.
I should mention that the accounts software I use, Easy Books, sends invoices as PDFs.Using PDF is one good solution.
Thanks, GraemeL, this thread has gone completely off-topic, but let's roll with it, aye?![]()
MS have researched and developed in response to customer demand. Open source software, on the other hand, is developed reactively, as and when users find issues or needs. The Google Apps development follows a similar pattern to open source.over-featured, over-complicated, exploitative bullsh*t.
Like most people, I've got hundreds of GB of unused storage on my HDD and access to tons more online for free.Most business' need data storage, processing...
Like most people, I've got hundreds of GB of unused storage on my HDD and access to tons more online for free.
Word processing isn't CPU hungry and neither is 99% of SS work; I doubt most businesses need processing.
Sorry, we'll have to agree to disagree about all these needs
I think the point is being missed.
There just wont be any one off payment software solutions going forward.
There will be
and combinations of the above, but the one off piece of software distributed on a CD ( or floppy drive ) is a dead concept. No software developer would chose that business model so it wont exist. Sure, there are some laggard and right now they do exist, but that is the nature of what they call 'digital disruption'.
- Open source - self hosted
- Cloud subscription
- In house developed
Can a small business ave some money by finding some non subscription software, sure they can.
Is it worth the effort? Maybe / maybe not