Personalised Google Results

Gillie

Free Member
Apr 12, 2006
13,065
1,463
North West England
Just read an article that is suggesting that google analytics, toolbar and accounts etc will all play a part in giving the user a more personalised results in google.

And that the emphasis will move away from links etc ...

That everyone who logs in using google etc will see varying different results based on their use etc ...

Thoughts anyone?
 
Kind of relevant to your topic and an interesting read.

The most comprehensive empirical study of digital music sales ever conducted has some bad news for Californian technology utopians. Since 2004, WiReD magazine editor Chris Anderson has been hawking his "Long Tail" proposition around the world: blockbusters will matter less, and businesses will "sell less of more". The graph has become iconic - a kind of 'Hockey Stick' for Web 2.0 - with the author applying his message to many different business sectors. Alas, following the WiReD Way of Business as a matter of faith could be catastrophic for your business and investment decisions.

Examining tens of millions of transactions from a large digital music provider, economist Will Page with Mblox founder Andrew Bud and Page's colleague Gary Eggleton, looked to see how large and valuable the "Tail" of digital music may be. They produced a spreadsheet with 1.5 million rows - so large, in fact, that it required a special upgrade to their Excel software (and more RAM) - and the three revealed their work at the Telco 2.0 conference this week.


They discovered that instead of following a Pareto or "power law" curve, as Anderson suggested, digital song sales follow a classic Log Normal distribution. 80 per cent of the digital inventory sold no copies at all - and the 'head' was far more concentrated than the economists expected.


"Is the 'future of business' really selling more of less?" asks Page. "Absolutely not. If you had Top of the Pops now, you'd feature the Top 14, not Top 40."

Link
 
Upvote 0

colin bruce

Free Member
Mar 31, 2008
18
1
Oxted
Is it not the case that, to a large percentage of queries, there are select good answers that are irrelevant to the searcher's proclivity?

Some ambiguous results that produce binomial or trinomal results may be optmised over time based upon regionality or interest e.g. people <18 probably don't care about discounting invoices when searching for "factoring" whereas most people >18 do.

Perhaps if you never go to wikipedia then wikiperdia ranks less highly and vice versa.

Or perhaps, as I can be cynical, personalisation is an exercise in optimising for searches where an adwords result is better than a natural result.

...
 
Upvote 0

Latest Articles

Join UK Business Forums for free business advice