I have found this thread very helpful with some very interesting arguments. I agree that it seems that there is not really any special merit in obtaining any old degree - from what I have seen correct spelling and grammar is not a prerequisite for a pass (however it will affect the grading).
I have spent the last five years working full-time and studying part-time to get a first class degree in Building Surveying. Until I complete a further two years APC I will not be Chartered by the RICS.
I can see the point that if it is pertinent to the job or makes you stick out in a business that is not particularly known for being a chartered/professional industry then letters should be used and if not, don't bother. I really wouldn't be too chuffed at having my accounts done by an "Artist" or is that creative accountancy?
I obtained my results today and have achieved the first class honours degree that I set out for from day one. Woohoo! And yes, I do want to shout it from the rooftops. Which is why, I suppose, I found my way to this forum.
I do work in a business that is not chartered and some may think not even very professional - Estate Agency. I am not an Estate Agent or, I hasten to add ashamed of the company I work for who are professional, honest and hard working (you guessed it - we're independent and NOT Foxtons) I manage property and act as a surveyor within the agency. Displaying BSc (Hons) after my name does not give my clients any idea that I am qualified to do my job or that I am a trainee Building Surveyor, it could after all refer to an IT qualification or any other scientific subject. Nor, does displaying the letters after my name set me apart from the remaining 88% (approximate statistics) of students that will be awarded 2:1's, 2:2's and third class degrees. It is that "first class" that has added credibility and an amount of merit to the degree that is considered undervalued. It shows that I can spell - even without a spell check gizmo, that I can think for myself and present ideas of my own without copying passages of text from other academics, it shows that I am not a cheat (as my other pals did not get first's), that I can be a professional and also that at the grand old age of 42 this old dog can be taught new tricks.
So as much as I want to shout it from the rooftops, I feel it would be better to add my date of birth or age after my name as that goes some way to explain that I can communicate in other ways apart from txt spk (that's text speak I think), that my education and my 'O' Levels were worth more than modern day 'A' Levels. Until I get to be a member or fellow of RICS my name will remain unadorned. My job title on my business cards and under my name on my letters will inform the people I deal with what my role is and the way that I behave, the professionalism I portray and the effectiveness with which I carry out my day to day tasks will continue to be the only proof of my competences.
I will finish this long post by adding that although this is my personal preference I would not judge or think badly of anyone who chooses to put letters after their names but it would always be helpful to know that those letters relate to the service they are offering. If you want to do it, just because like me, you're proud of your achievement and want to tell the world, go for it and stuff anyone that doesn't like it.

)