By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
And before any SMARTarse like marchog says it -
viruses dont count in this context, since they cannot have "life" independent of other host organisms, ergo they cannot have been the FIRST "life form" from which all others are descended....which is what we are questioning here. How did the first reproducing/evolving organism come to exist?
http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/badastronomy/2009/03/25/turtles-all-the-way-down/
"When a person like this is asked who or what created God, the standard answer is that God always existed. But why cant we say the same about the Universe itself? Its entirely possible the Universe is a part of a larger structure, a metaverse, if you will, that always existed and always will. Our understanding of the nature of time is still incomplete, so something like this is not out of the question."
Way back in the thread I quoted Prof Hawkins who reckons there's a 70% chance that the universe started spontaneously out of nothing.
I have no idea what that means.
One of the world's most prestigious medical journals, the Lancet, has accused Pope Benedict XVI of distorting science in his remarks on condom use. ........the London-based Lancet said the Pope had "publicly distorted scientific evidence to promote Catholic doctrine on this issue".
It said the male latex condom was the single most efficient way to reduce the sexual transmission of HIV/Aids.
"Whether the Pope's error was due to ignorance or a deliberate attempt to manipulate science to support Catholic ideology is unclear," said the journal.
But is said the comment still stood and urged the Vatican to issue a retraction.
"When any influential person, be it a religious or political figure, makes a false scientific statement that could be devastating to the health of millions of people, they should retract or correct the public record," it said.
"Anything less from Pope Benedict would be an immense disservice to the public and health advocates, including many thousands of Catholics, who work tirelessly to try and prevent the spread of HIV/Aids worldwide."
Does this bring into question the validity of every other UFO case? We believe it does.
classic CJD (il)logic:
here is proof that this ming vase is a forgery.
ergo all ming vases are forgeries.
ergo ming vases do not exist
CJD - go take a foundation course in basic logic.
If your logic is up to it that is.
classic CJD (il)logic:
here is proof that this ming vase is a forgery.
ergo all ming vases are forgeries.
ergo ming vases do not exist
CJD - go take a foundation course in basic logic.
If your logic is up to it that is.
These things did not just happen by chance now did they?
Does the Watch need a watch maker?
We pretty much understand how volcanos and hurricanes work. Chance seems to have some hand in them.
Yes.
Does that argument apply to life the universe and everything?
1. Yes. Then who/what made God?
2. No. We might not be able to comprehend this answer, but I'm assured it is quite possible, actually probable
3. Don't know. Probably the only sane answer.
What has that to do with belief in an all loving god that died for our sins and intervenes daily in our lives? Nothing.
As for a creater of God, well perhaps when i meet God, i will ask God
If he's ignoring you now it's not very promising.
I heard Colin sorted him out with a Voipfone package?
Excellent, can i have his number Colin?
Here's a good post for 'fine-tuning' fans:-
http://baldblackhole.blogspot.com/2009/04/fine-tuning-argument.html
Paley's Watchmaker was killed off by Evolutionary Theory.
I suppose the next logical step is to say 'obviously quantum physics is too weird to have not been designed - albeit by someone who was obviously deranged'
You make big statements in the hope that somebody will believe them......your constancy of saying them doesn't make them true.
You keep on implying that "if complex things must have been intelligently designed by something more complex than themselves, then anything posited as this complex designer (i.e. God) must also have been designed by something yet more complex."
However the logic used is flawed. Anyone who creates time and the "laws of the universe" would not be bounded by them. The laws did not exist until they were created. So time did not exist until it was created. So why would anyone think that the same rules would apply to the person who created them?
"Who created God"? It's like saying "what happened 5 minutes before time was created".
You are using the laws that have been given to us...........anyone who creates these laws would be outside of them otherwise they wouldn't need to create the laws. You are falling into the trap of using what you know to try to argue against what you do not know.
But you'll keep on saying the same old tired things in the hope that you sound convincing.