- Original Poster
- #1
Hi there,
I'd be most grateful if anyone is able to help me.
I've worked full-time for six months for the same company as an agency worker, employed through a large high street employment agency. The hiring company expects to have a role for me there for at least another year.
My understanding was that, under the Agency Workers Regulations, I'm entitled to the same paid annual leave allowance as my directly-employed colleagues. (Also, my company doesn't distinguish between Day 1 and 12 week rights - they give agency workers equal rights from day 1).
I also understood that, under the Working Time Regulations, I'm entitled to accrue holiday during any sick leave in the same way as a direct recruit.
However, after a short period of sickness (3 days), my agency is telling me that I do not accrue holiday for any days where I have not returned any hours and therefore not accumulated any pay.
They say the same applies to any flexi days I work (which are agreed with my hirer, and where I work my necessary full-time hours before taking the flexi time off).
Therefore, over the course of a year, I am currently on course to end up with significantly less paid holiday allowance than my directly-employed colleagues who work full-time and under the same conditions as me.
This seems to directly contradict the Agency Workers Regulations, which stipulate that I am entitled to equal treatment as my permanent colleagues as far as paid annual leave is concerned.
The agency appears to be behaving as though every time I have a sick day or a flexi day, it constitutes a break in my "assignment", even though I have worked there full-time week in, week out, for six months.
Is the agency's action legal?
I would be very glad indeed of any advice.
Many thanks!
Erlicheer.
I'd be most grateful if anyone is able to help me.
I've worked full-time for six months for the same company as an agency worker, employed through a large high street employment agency. The hiring company expects to have a role for me there for at least another year.
My understanding was that, under the Agency Workers Regulations, I'm entitled to the same paid annual leave allowance as my directly-employed colleagues. (Also, my company doesn't distinguish between Day 1 and 12 week rights - they give agency workers equal rights from day 1).
I also understood that, under the Working Time Regulations, I'm entitled to accrue holiday during any sick leave in the same way as a direct recruit.
However, after a short period of sickness (3 days), my agency is telling me that I do not accrue holiday for any days where I have not returned any hours and therefore not accumulated any pay.
They say the same applies to any flexi days I work (which are agreed with my hirer, and where I work my necessary full-time hours before taking the flexi time off).
Therefore, over the course of a year, I am currently on course to end up with significantly less paid holiday allowance than my directly-employed colleagues who work full-time and under the same conditions as me.
This seems to directly contradict the Agency Workers Regulations, which stipulate that I am entitled to equal treatment as my permanent colleagues as far as paid annual leave is concerned.
The agency appears to be behaving as though every time I have a sick day or a flexi day, it constitutes a break in my "assignment", even though I have worked there full-time week in, week out, for six months.
Is the agency's action legal?
I would be very glad indeed of any advice.
Many thanks!
Erlicheer.
