- Original Poster
- #1
Hey All,
So we have a customer which has been a pain for us for some time I am wondering how to handle the situation.
The customer has several support and computing services with us and we advised them quite some time ago there equipment needs replacing. They basically refused the quote and now they are saying they are due to hire a contractor to replace the the equipment and set it all up. They are wanting to give this contractor access to all their systems we manage but we are not comfortable with giving an unknown 3rd party contractor access while we are supporting there systems.
I am thinking it would be a wise idea to terminate the contract on the grounds of a conflict of interest as this contractor would be a competitor of ours and the fact we wouldn't want to support a system we haven't setup. Then giving the customer 1 month notice, which we would ask for there previous invoices to be settle and demand a month in advance to cover the cost of the remaining month, then give them access once all payment has been settled.
Does this sound like a reasonable way to handle this? Can anyone see any legal flaws here?
Thanks in Advance.
So we have a customer which has been a pain for us for some time I am wondering how to handle the situation.
The customer has several support and computing services with us and we advised them quite some time ago there equipment needs replacing. They basically refused the quote and now they are saying they are due to hire a contractor to replace the the equipment and set it all up. They are wanting to give this contractor access to all their systems we manage but we are not comfortable with giving an unknown 3rd party contractor access while we are supporting there systems.
I am thinking it would be a wise idea to terminate the contract on the grounds of a conflict of interest as this contractor would be a competitor of ours and the fact we wouldn't want to support a system we haven't setup. Then giving the customer 1 month notice, which we would ask for there previous invoices to be settle and demand a month in advance to cover the cost of the remaining month, then give them access once all payment has been settled.
Does this sound like a reasonable way to handle this? Can anyone see any legal flaws here?
Thanks in Advance.
Last edited: