First, let me say that people who have money and do not pay, do not have my sympathy.
I have been doing mainly claimant debt recovery litigation for many years with a high degree of success without resorting to harassment. What I want is the large organisations, such as banks and utility companies, to use the courts if there is a debt genuinely outstanding. I also want the courts to be more effective with more teeth to make those who have the money to be forced to pay up. Yes, court fees have risen in recent years and the standard of service is not always good, but these large organisations such as banks have the resources to use the courts and do not need to resort to harassment.
As to those individuals who hide behind limited liability (ie spend a lot of other people's money and then wind up the company etc) yes many of them are rogues. I have long argued for a reform to the law which would enable creditors (and not simply the Liquidator or Secretary of State as at present) to apply to the court for an order that the director contributes to the debts of the liquidated company where there has been wrongful and fraudulent trading. It's ironic when I make posts about this, there are replies about the damage it would do to the concept of limited liability. When a company is "going down the pan" but the directors do nothing and keep spending, then there needs to be an easier mechanism to hold these individuals to account. The present crop of insolvency laws are inadequate.
As to how you find out if people have the money or are taking you for a ride, well there are precautions that can be taken before contracting with customers. You would be surprised by the number of my clients who often do not even know the proper legal entity of the person they are supplying. Simple background checks and requiring guarantees from property owning individuals where the customer is a new company, can reduce the chances of being caught by a rogue company. I am happy to give some practical advice in this respect by private message.
Anyway, thanks for the interesting comments so far. Its good to get a range of views.
Anthony Reeves