I think that both points of view are correct depending on the situation.
It's a valid point that if you want someone to create a market brand for your company then there is a lot more work involved than may go into just getting a logo designed but again it depends on the scenario.
For example if Coca Cola decide they want to start a business running gated communities then I've no doubt they would spend millions of pounds on brand image, brand identity, suitable brand penetration of the desired market sector in order to have maximum targeted impact from the very first day. They wouldn't just pay for a simple logo to add to their stationery.
On the other hand a start-up newsagents on the high street would not necessarily spend vast volumes of their budget creating an all consuming brand identity, instead being satisfied with a logo on a sign that reflects the basic ethos of their business.
I don't think the newsagents spending £200 on a new sign is making a bad business decision because they're not spending 20k on marketing a unique brand in the marketplace. I also don't think they're getting ripped off by everybody who suggests they could do the work for £200.
On the other hand should that newsagents be wildly successful and open up a chain of 50 newsagents in the first 3 years I think that employing a company to carry out a more thorough branding exercise for the firm would be a good idea and the level of work involved would naturally incur a much higher investment than £200.
Essentially what we're discussing is "expectation". I have just had two logos designed, each for £50 and I'm happy with what I have received. I wanted a different logo to go on top of each of my company websites and to add to email messages. That's what I expected, that is the service I was sold and that is what I got.
Now, if the firm had promised to completely re-brand my entire organisation, carry out customer research of my sector, research the industry and then put together a package, for £50, then I know that wouldn't be possible and have them still make a living and they would most probably be spinning me a line. If I had believed such a pitch then expected to get a service that really should cost several thousand pounds then yes that firm would be conning me and it would make other firms charging the actual rate look ridiculous, price wise.
You're commenting on the other site and saying how paying low rates means you get rubbish and you should hire professional designers but looking on your company website you're a second year graphical design student, which is not what I would class as a professional graphic designer, but rather a trainee graphic designer.
The first two examples in your portfolio seem pretty basic with the first for Nikki Strange just being the name of the company in a fun font. There are only four example in your portfolio so not really much to go on, especially when discussing brand identity.
Therefore I could level the same criticisms at you that you are levelling at cheaper firms but flip it the other way to suggest that you are trying to charge the higher rates of a professional designer before you have actually reached that level i.e. you are deceiving customers by charging too much rather than too little.
Now before you get too offended about my last three paragraphs I have to say that I don't think the title of professional is only restricted to people out of university, I don't think that your designs are basic and I don't think that you're deceiving customers.
Professional has nothing to do with whether you're a 2nd year student or not; you can be capable, talented and professional at any point in your life or career.
I actually really like the Nikki Strange design. It looks very cool. Having a good logo that is deceptively simple is not a bad thing hence my Coca Cola reference
Finally it would be ridiculous of me to suggest that if you're running a business whilst in Uni' you wouldn't need to earn a decent wage like anyone else running a business. It would just be a stupid point to make.
So, the reason I furnished these examples from your perspective was to demonstrate that the same criticisms you are making about other firms can also be applied to you (rightly or wrongly). You know that as far as you are concerned they're not accurate therefore if they can be levelled at you and you can dismiss them this should refute the same argument you make about others.
Also anyone who likes Atari Teenage Riot is always going to be in my good books
