By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
The trend was started by the U.S. First Amendment auditors (again all about the views). It spread here purely because of the channel monetisation.What in the UK
I have seen a few of these Youtube videos. If you look at the comments to each of the videos, you will see that about 99% of the comments are in praise of the actions of the drone controller. In fact I scanned hundreds of comments of quite a few videos and found only one which was not for these drones, and that one was posted my yours truly.It will remain popular as long as people keep watching and the various channels are monetised.
It's all about the viewing numbers. The more business owners object and kick off, the more views the videos get.
In most cases it's completely legal and the owners and managers are doing their business a disservice.
All done under the guise of exercising the rights of the photographer. These guys make good money, so there's no stopping it.
The real consequences are for the irate business owners. Auditors and drone flyers are very quick to report assaults to the police (which rarely end in arrest). If it gets to that stage you can almost guarantee a flood of one star reviews on Google for the business. 100% of auditors play the victim when the police get involved.I have seen a few of these Youtube videos. If you look at the comments to each of the videos, you will see that about 99% of the comments are in praise of the actions of the drone controller. In fact I scanned hundreds of comments of quite a few videos and found only one which was not for these drones, and that one was posted my yours truly.
No it's not. It started (as another posted mentioned) in the USA. It's all over Europe as well. You just see UK TikToks as you are in the UK.Pretty much exclusively in the UK, from what I see on TikTok.
That's interesting. On TikTok, the responses contain a lot of criticism for these self-appointed guardians of transparency. In the eyes of many people, they have been well and truly sussed. What I'm curious about, though, is just how big a nuisance this is becoming in the commercial world.I have seen a few of these Youtube videos. If you look at the comments to each of the videos, you will see that about 99% of the comments are in praise of the actions of the drone controller. In fact I scanned hundreds of comments of quite a few videos and found only one which was not for these drones, and that one was posted my yours truly.
Right, thanks for the clarification.No it's not. It started (as another posted mentioned) in the USA. It's all over Europe as well. You just see UK TikToks as you are in the UK.
It won't go anywhere, it's an easy way to make money and in almost all circumstances it is perfectly legal. The more the owner kicks up the more views they get. Have you ever noticed there are very few where they don't get any interaction with the owner or a manager etc?
It only becomes a nuisance if the owners or managers kick off. Nobody is watching these videos to see what a factory roof looks like. Everybody wants to see the auditor arguing with the staff and managers. Without the angry back and forth, the video won't make money. Better to ignore or invite them in for a tour and a coffeeWhat I'm curious about, though, is just how big a nuisance this is becoming in the commercial world.
Couldn't agree more. 'Ignore them to the point where they start to doubt their own existence,' to borrow a wonderful phrase I recently read in a very different context. The goading would go on, mind. There's a Scottish 'auditor' who is the absolute master at maximising his pain-in-the-arse potential, and I know just what he'd say to people refusing to give him the time of day. "Not very professional, is it; you refusing to engage with your public like this?" At which point his target should simply smile at him the way you would at a small child stamping his feet at being told it's bedtime, and walk on. As you suggest, best of luck trying to monetise videos of roofs and sweet smiles.It only becomes a nuisance if the owners or managers kick off. Nobody is watching these videos to see what a factory roof looks like. Everybody wants to see the auditor arguing with the staff and managers. Without the angry back and forth, the video won't make money. Better to ignore or invite them in for a tour and a coffee![]()
I know the one you mean. Ironically calls his channel Meet the Tyrants. If you don't bite, he'll provoke you until you do. Some of the staff the auditors run into are idiots though. Makes for great entertainment.There's a Scottish 'auditor' who is the absolute master at maximising his pain-in-the-arse potential
So it's really just clickbait. How do you even know you have been 'audited'? Do you get an email or something? I never even watched a tiktok so have no idea how this works.Good question. They are supposed to be all about transparency in public life. In reality, they are all about confrontation and provoking a reaction. 'auditing' in this context should always be in inverted commas.![]()
Classic example of the genre from YouTube. The sport kicks off at the 6:07 mark. This guy doing the filming is a provocation maestro. 'Escalate', 'Back to work' and 'organ-grinder' just a few trademarks from his well-worn script. One day, a real auditor might want to audit how many man-hours these busybodies take up. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27UvA8
Thankfully the cost of a decent drone keeps a lot of idiots away from the game. There are relatively few who have time to build a following and get monetised. There are probably only around 10 'auditors' who make a living from this in the U.K. But those who do, make good money.Is this why HS2 costs are going through the roof?
Just to be pedantic, the youtube video that @JeffPWFB gave was of someone with a "bat detector" on a building site, hence the HS2 reference. He did not have a drone, but I take your point.Thankfully the cost of a decent drone keeps a lot of idiots away from the game. There are relatively few who have time to build a following and get monetised. There are probably only around 10 'auditors' who make a living from this in the U.K. But those who do, make good money.
And yes, HS2 has been 'audited' several times.
He does fly a drone and is actually one of the better pilots. He just likes to have a reason to walk onto someone's property (even if it's BS). There was a recent one where he had a bird of prey whistle and pretended to be looking for his lost Peregrine Falcon. Gives him something to pad the video out before he gets kicked out. If he can't get to people to antagonise, he gets the drone out and they come to him.Just to be pedantic, the youtube video that @JeffPWFB gave was of someone with a "bat detector" on a building site, hence the HS2 reference. He did not have a drone, but I take your point.
True, but he does have a drone and is quite prepared to use it. In the interests of karmic equilibrium, I'll throw in this clip of the same man getting his come-uppance at the hands of someone in the haulage industry, who speaks for a rejoicing nation at the 42:20 mark. The rest of the video reveals that the 'auditor's knowledge of the law may not be quite as faultless as his bombast often suggests. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22_ixvms1xMJust to be pedantic, the youtube video that @JeffPWFB gave was of someone with a "bat detector" on a building site, hence the HS2 reference. He did not have a drone, but I take your point.
The one that annoys me is that Cyclist Mikey.W*nkers, the lot of them - and that's the only word to describe them. Including the Scottish knob-jockey Mark Evans (allegedly a convicted sex offender) in the videos above. I haven't seen that video of him getting battered before though, so thanks for that
Another one is Curtis Arnold, who was I believe convicted following the Nicola Bulley case where he was continually flying a drone/trespassing over the search site. Has since changed his name I believe.
I just wish more business owners were clued up. Smile politely, walk away, and let them get on with filming the roof of their building. They'd soon get bored like a naughty child that isn't getting a reaction.
He has been going for quite a while. He annoys me too.The one that annoys me is that Cyclist Mikey.
This rule doesn't apply to drones under 250gm.Keep required horizontal distances (50 m from people/buildings, 150 m in built-up areas)
He's not an 'auditor', he's a Legend!![]()
I think it's a case of once bitten, twice shy. He's copped a bit of grief from over-the-top aggressive staff. Idiots on both sides of the fence.I loved the DJ Audits one where he was expecting grief from the member of staff running towards him, but the guy said "you're DJ Audits, I watch all your videos, are you putting the drone up? Brilliant" .
It was a very short audit.
Yup. Take confrontation out of these scenarios and this whole 'auditing' thing will be gone in two years, if that.I loved the DJ Audits one where he was expecting grief from the member of staff running towards him, but the guy said "you're DJ Audits, I watch all your videos, are you putting the drone up? Brilliant" .
It was a very short audit.