By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
I too use Bitwarden. To be fair it isn't quite as good as LastPass, but it does the job and it's free.I looked at a few password managers, including lastpass. I went with bitwarden. It has similar features, but is open source.
No, Lastpass itself was breached and all the customer data copied. Those who have been using Lastpass for a long time are said to be especially vulnerable. See https://www.intego.com/mac-security-blog/lastpass-password-manager-suffers-massive-data-breach/The only breaches where people who had it configured wrong, you can log into lastpass without using a password. Do that on a doggy old android phone and you're asking for trouble!
No, Lastpass itself was breached and all the customer data copied. Those who have been using Lastpass for a long time are said to be especially vulnerable. See https://www.intego.com/mac-security-blog/lastpass-password-manager-suffers-massive-data-breach/
It doesn't really matter. Entrusting your password data to a third party is a nonstarter if you are serious about security.So hard to get to the truth with this sorta stuff, how much of it is mud slinging from competitors, how much are lastpass not telling us.
It's all about a balance of risk and that balance depends on circumstances. What is a good solution for you would be problematic for many others I suspect. A good password manager with 2FA is likely a big step up in security for most as opposed to the widespread reuse or emails / usernames and passwords because no one can remember all the unique ones.It doesn't really matter. Entrusting your password data to a third party is a nonstarter if you are serious about security.
For instance I have the root passwords of all my client's servers. Never in a million years would I let that data go outside my own direct control. I won't even say what I use, as to do so would also be a breach of security.
Security via obscurity is not a good idea. It has been debunked for years and years.It doesn't really matter. Entrusting your password data to a third party is a nonstarter if you are serious about security.
For instance I have the root passwords of all my client's servers. Never in a million years would I let that data go outside my own direct control. I won't even say what I use, as to do so would also be a breach of security.
Refusing to say what methods are used, e.g. refusing to say he uses Bitwarden, or whatever, is not security by obscurity.Security via obscurity is not a good idea. It has been debunked for years and years.
I suggest you read that article which explains how security by obscurity is a valid piece of the jigsaw.![]()
Security through obscurity - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Security via obscurity is not a good idea. It has been debunked for years and years.
![]()
Security through obscurity - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
That's right, nor did he tell us he's not doing it. In fact, he didn't tell us anything about what he's doing, other than the data is under his direct control. with the implication he doesn't use a cloud service.Thats not what the man said he was doing.
He didn't tell us anything about how he's holding it. He may well be running a locally hosted password manager (which has been recommended on UKBF).If your holding sensitive or important data, it would make sense not to give bad actors the first foothold, by telling them how you hold it.
Just when some say a non-cloud hosted solution is safer, a self-hosted one Keepass has an issue
Web Application Security, Testing, & Scanning - PortSwigger
PortSwigger offers tools for web application security, testing, & scanning. Choose from a range of security tools, & identify the very latest vulnerabilities.portswigger.net
If it truly is stored securely, it won't matter if the attacker knows how or not.Thats not what the man said he was doing.
If your holding sensitive or important data, it would make sense not to give bad actors the first foothold, by telling them how you hold it.
You pick a security product because it looks good?! You should choose based on security and technology instead. UI is going to be way down the list.I evangelise 1password whoever I go. I was a long time Lastpass user - but always found it clunky.
When I discovered and tried 1password, lastpass all of a sudden looked as if it was designed in Microsoft word!
If you’re a lover of aesthetic in any way, I think 1p will hands down be your favourite password manager of any you try.
I can see how you arrived at that conclusion but no. It’s a superior product that happens to also have an amazing UX.You pick a security product because it looks good?! You should choose based on security and technology instead. UI is going to be way down the list.
I'm still rolling with LastPass, it works beautifully with all my apps and devices, I understand its myriad of security settings, I keep those very tight and I use it with 2FA via an authenticator app.
I was using lastpass, but seems to have gotten worse, also moved to bitwarden, works well, like lasspass use to.I looked at a few password managers, including lastpass. I went with bitwarden. It has similar features, but is open source.