- Original Poster
- #1
Dear All,
I have a query that I hope some HR guru will be able to advise on?
I have just started as Head of Projects at a company where, 3 years ago, staff were given the option of reducing lunch from an hour to 1/2hr but then either leaving 30 mins early each day or finishing at Lunch every second Friday.
The company directors are not happy, even though they authorized the change, as they feel that the employees are getting something for nothing, but they are writing into the 'new' company handbook that the 'flexible' method of working is not contractual and can be withdrawn at any time.
Is there a point that the working hours becomes common practice to the extent where it could be classed as contractual?
Thanks for your help.
I have a query that I hope some HR guru will be able to advise on?
I have just started as Head of Projects at a company where, 3 years ago, staff were given the option of reducing lunch from an hour to 1/2hr but then either leaving 30 mins early each day or finishing at Lunch every second Friday.
The company directors are not happy, even though they authorized the change, as they feel that the employees are getting something for nothing, but they are writing into the 'new' company handbook that the 'flexible' method of working is not contractual and can be withdrawn at any time.
Is there a point that the working hours becomes common practice to the extent where it could be classed as contractual?
Thanks for your help.
