- Original Poster
- #1
Hello!
I'm new to this forum so please bear with.
I am in the process of applying for a trademark for my business, as someone else has started to use the same name and operates in the same arena. Let's pretend the company is called The Big Dish Company. I would like to trademark "The Big Dish Company" and "Big Dishes".
Question 1 - Are these similar enough to be classed as a 'series' or would they need to be two separate applications?
Question 2 - A trade mark already exists for "Big Dishes", and includes a class which I am including in my application. I know that two trademarks can exist within the same class as long as they are for different products. I have also been told though, by the IPO, that a couple of months ago a new rule came in that said you can't use generic terms like "Goods made of wood", you have to specify what the actual goods are else it is deemed too vague and indefensible. The owner of the existing trademark registered the trademark before the new rules about not being too generic though and therefore has "Goods made from..." listed in his terms. The terms I have listed are a subset of this e.g. wooden dishes. Does this mean that my application could be rejected because of an overlap? Or would they consider the fact that the term used by the other Big Dishes company is now considered too encompassing?
Thank you!
I'm new to this forum so please bear with.
I am in the process of applying for a trademark for my business, as someone else has started to use the same name and operates in the same arena. Let's pretend the company is called The Big Dish Company. I would like to trademark "The Big Dish Company" and "Big Dishes".
Question 1 - Are these similar enough to be classed as a 'series' or would they need to be two separate applications?
Question 2 - A trade mark already exists for "Big Dishes", and includes a class which I am including in my application. I know that two trademarks can exist within the same class as long as they are for different products. I have also been told though, by the IPO, that a couple of months ago a new rule came in that said you can't use generic terms like "Goods made of wood", you have to specify what the actual goods are else it is deemed too vague and indefensible. The owner of the existing trademark registered the trademark before the new rules about not being too generic though and therefore has "Goods made from..." listed in his terms. The terms I have listed are a subset of this e.g. wooden dishes. Does this mean that my application could be rejected because of an overlap? Or would they consider the fact that the term used by the other Big Dishes company is now considered too encompassing?
Thank you!
