- Original Poster
- #1
I recently applied for a trademark for my business. I did the application myself as I had some advice on which classes to use and was told it was a straightforward process.
I registered two marks in series. The first was simply the name of my company, lets say it's BOBBO. It's a unique, made up word which I am sure will not face objection. The second was our logo. Our logo is made up of a stylised text of the word BOBBO and a simple graphic illustration above the text.
I've just gotten a reply from the IPO and they have an objection:
There is an objection under Section 41(2) of the Act, because the second mark includes a distinctive device not present in the first, word only mark, changing the visual identities of the marks.
This objection may be overcome by choosing one mark to proceed.
My question is about which one I should choose. I'm really struggling to understand the disadvantages of going either route. If I use just the logo does this prevent someone from using my name with a different logo? If I choose just the text BOBBO is this more all encompassing and prevent all use of my name? Then what would be the point of ever registering a logo? Also I noticed some of my competitors have only trademarked their logos (which include text of their name), so this further confuses me.
Appreciate any advice.
I registered two marks in series. The first was simply the name of my company, lets say it's BOBBO. It's a unique, made up word which I am sure will not face objection. The second was our logo. Our logo is made up of a stylised text of the word BOBBO and a simple graphic illustration above the text.
I've just gotten a reply from the IPO and they have an objection:
There is an objection under Section 41(2) of the Act, because the second mark includes a distinctive device not present in the first, word only mark, changing the visual identities of the marks.
This objection may be overcome by choosing one mark to proceed.
My question is about which one I should choose. I'm really struggling to understand the disadvantages of going either route. If I use just the logo does this prevent someone from using my name with a different logo? If I choose just the text BOBBO is this more all encompassing and prevent all use of my name? Then what would be the point of ever registering a logo? Also I noticed some of my competitors have only trademarked their logos (which include text of their name), so this further confuses me.
Appreciate any advice.
