Its a reasonable value - just over £50k.
its been a joke with the court systems, they keep sending letters to the respondent who ignores, we have doubled checked all addresses and all is correct, they courts keep saying will send another letter, give it another 7 days, then we call and today its oh we need to give time for postal delays... its been months of this back and forth with the court system.
has anyone experienced it. To think this has been the same noise from them since we did this post tells you the challanges we're having the the 'system'
is anyone else having the same issues?
ref this business - if judgement is awarded they have plenty of assets on the balance sheet which should give us some weight - still trading. Seems odd they have not responded.
The Debtor is not responding - they is the courts, they keep giving them more time to respond and not issuing judgement. its a joke how much time they are allowing them to respond. Really odd.
I'm seriously beginning to wonder if this is some form of trolling exercise.
None of what you're saying makes the slightest bit of sense.
The court procedure is straightforward:
1. You send the claim form to the court and pay the issue fee.
2. The court issues the claim by stamping the claim form and (normally) posts it to the defendant.
3. The defendant has 14 days, starting 5 days from the date the court posts the claim form, to either file a defence or an acknowledgment of service.
4. If they do neither you apply for default judgment, and a few days later the court issues judgment for the amount claimed.
5. If they file a defence within the 14 days the case moves forward by way of the judge making directions as to what needs to be done in the way of producing evidence etc, and sets a timetable towards trial.
6. If they file an acknowledgment of service instead they have an additional 14 days to file their defence. Again, if they fail to do so within that extended time limit you apply for default judgement.
7. The overall 28 day limit can be extended by up to an additional 28 days by agreement between you and the defendant - but it appears that no such agreement was reached, and even if it had it has long since expired, again allowing you to go for default judgment if the defence wasn't filed.
8. The only way the defendant could obtain more time than the maximum of 56 days mentioned is by obtaining an order from the court allowing more time. They would need to provide very compelling reasons to justify a further extension, and you would be notified of the application and be offered the chance to have your say about it. You have made no mention of such an application ever having been made.
The court would
never grant a defendant extra time just on the basis of a letter requesting it. It's therefore impossible that they would write to you telling you that further time had been granted.
So one way or the other, the time for the defendant to file their defence must have expired months ago, at which time you would have applied for - and received - judgment.
And this is why none of what you are saying makes any sense at all.