- Original Poster
- #1
I have been reading all the reviews on RMS and unfortunately I am the latest victim of that company.
In the run up to xmas (our busiest sales period) our terminals did not work properly, sometimes taking three or four attempts to process any transactions and sometimes not working at all. We phoned the helpdesk repeatedly and nothing worked. We lost revenue and sales as some customers walked out on us. A couple of our customers reported that when they had used their cards in our terminal, if it took three attempts to go through, the amount of the transaction was treated as uncleared effects by their bank for three times of the amount that was originally processed. As a bank clerk in a previous life, I know that banks will reserve the amounts of any pdq transactions for 3 days and treat the item as uncleared effects on your account until the amount is actually debited on the third working day after the transaction has taken place. This is to stop you going to another shop and racking up huge pdq transactions for large amounts and not having enough money to pay for them. Therefore , when it took say three attempts to get the transaction to go through on our terminal, three amounts were "reserved" by the bank, even though only one amount was finally debited from the customer's account three days later. This led to a huge mistrust from our customers in using our machines and we lost revenue and sales as a result, never mind the poor customers who could not even get their cards to go through at all. This went on for 3 months. After 3 months of phone calls to RMS, and after them sending new terminals to us and trying to get us to upgrade to a newer terminal (at a costlier rental to us) and tying us in to another contract for 3 years (which we declined) nothing improved. So we wrote to them and told them that we could not carry on with the agreement as they had not rectified any problems we had. We were coming up to the end of our three year contract, so we gave notice to cancel . We paid all the outstanding rental and then received a threatening letter from them saying they were going to take us to court/give us CCJ's against our name and possibly send in baliffs as we owed them a £216.00 cancellation charge and we had not paid it. On reading your comments I have contacted trading standards and was advised by them to write to them (special delivery) and tell them that THEY were in breach of contract by not supplying us with a working terminal and if any court claim was made by RMS to us we could make a counter-claim back to RMS for loss of revenue. We were told not to pay these fees, as they were in breach of contract and to keep copies of letters, conversations etc, which we are doing. We have made a telephone call to RMS and recorded the conversation that took place, and we have a log of all letters and proof of postage etc for all other communication. Trading standards are still investigating this company it would seem and we have been given the name of the designated office that is working on the case. We will liase with her accordingly. We have now been left in limbo. We are waiting for their reply to our letter and I am now not sleeping at all at night as I am worried that baliffs will force their way into my shop and as a women who often works on her own am worried that I will not be able to defend myself. Wish I had never ever set eyes on RMS.
In the run up to xmas (our busiest sales period) our terminals did not work properly, sometimes taking three or four attempts to process any transactions and sometimes not working at all. We phoned the helpdesk repeatedly and nothing worked. We lost revenue and sales as some customers walked out on us. A couple of our customers reported that when they had used their cards in our terminal, if it took three attempts to go through, the amount of the transaction was treated as uncleared effects by their bank for three times of the amount that was originally processed. As a bank clerk in a previous life, I know that banks will reserve the amounts of any pdq transactions for 3 days and treat the item as uncleared effects on your account until the amount is actually debited on the third working day after the transaction has taken place. This is to stop you going to another shop and racking up huge pdq transactions for large amounts and not having enough money to pay for them. Therefore , when it took say three attempts to get the transaction to go through on our terminal, three amounts were "reserved" by the bank, even though only one amount was finally debited from the customer's account three days later. This led to a huge mistrust from our customers in using our machines and we lost revenue and sales as a result, never mind the poor customers who could not even get their cards to go through at all. This went on for 3 months. After 3 months of phone calls to RMS, and after them sending new terminals to us and trying to get us to upgrade to a newer terminal (at a costlier rental to us) and tying us in to another contract for 3 years (which we declined) nothing improved. So we wrote to them and told them that we could not carry on with the agreement as they had not rectified any problems we had. We were coming up to the end of our three year contract, so we gave notice to cancel . We paid all the outstanding rental and then received a threatening letter from them saying they were going to take us to court/give us CCJ's against our name and possibly send in baliffs as we owed them a £216.00 cancellation charge and we had not paid it. On reading your comments I have contacted trading standards and was advised by them to write to them (special delivery) and tell them that THEY were in breach of contract by not supplying us with a working terminal and if any court claim was made by RMS to us we could make a counter-claim back to RMS for loss of revenue. We were told not to pay these fees, as they were in breach of contract and to keep copies of letters, conversations etc, which we are doing. We have made a telephone call to RMS and recorded the conversation that took place, and we have a log of all letters and proof of postage etc for all other communication. Trading standards are still investigating this company it would seem and we have been given the name of the designated office that is working on the case. We will liase with her accordingly. We have now been left in limbo. We are waiting for their reply to our letter and I am now not sleeping at all at night as I am worried that baliffs will force their way into my shop and as a women who often works on her own am worried that I will not be able to defend myself. Wish I had never ever set eyes on RMS.