- Original Poster
- #1
Good morning
I run an online transport website for enthusiasts. My website is newer and lesser known than it's primary competitor, but still a good 8 years old and has around 1500 unique users a day. Many of these are loyal.
Gradually over the years this competitor has adopted certain traits and features in similarity to my website, I'm not particularly bothered about as It could be coincidence.
Unfortunately recently however, I have seen on groups and forums that some of the competitors users are recommending particular features that I have already established, major USPs of my site isn't just coincidence, they've clearly checked out my site, taken the concept and recommended it to my competitor. Why not use my site instead? Well...
My site is already at a significant handicap. My competitor being better off financially, has been able to secure agreements with particular parties in a manner that grants them exclusive industry data no-one else is able to get access to. Ie internal transport company data like vehicle registrations that users are in high demand over for spotting etc.
Cartels and anticompetition laws aside, is there anything I can do to protect my ideas and concepts with them being such a generic principal? Copyright and trademarks would only affect the brand itself and any written work, not something so generic as an idea that nobody else yet employs.
Obviously the personal that came up with the fidget spinner got completely screwed over when Chinese factories started rolling them out cheap, so I'm guessing there's not really anything I can do to protect my ideas which are very broad.
The only thing I can think of is spam the groups and discussions boards with "good idea, this website already does this" but like I say my competitor has data which can take my concepts further so the argument is nullified.
I run an online transport website for enthusiasts. My website is newer and lesser known than it's primary competitor, but still a good 8 years old and has around 1500 unique users a day. Many of these are loyal.
Gradually over the years this competitor has adopted certain traits and features in similarity to my website, I'm not particularly bothered about as It could be coincidence.
Unfortunately recently however, I have seen on groups and forums that some of the competitors users are recommending particular features that I have already established, major USPs of my site isn't just coincidence, they've clearly checked out my site, taken the concept and recommended it to my competitor. Why not use my site instead? Well...
My site is already at a significant handicap. My competitor being better off financially, has been able to secure agreements with particular parties in a manner that grants them exclusive industry data no-one else is able to get access to. Ie internal transport company data like vehicle registrations that users are in high demand over for spotting etc.
Cartels and anticompetition laws aside, is there anything I can do to protect my ideas and concepts with them being such a generic principal? Copyright and trademarks would only affect the brand itself and any written work, not something so generic as an idea that nobody else yet employs.
Obviously the personal that came up with the fidget spinner got completely screwed over when Chinese factories started rolling them out cheap, so I'm guessing there's not really anything I can do to protect my ideas which are very broad.
The only thing I can think of is spam the groups and discussions boards with "good idea, this website already does this" but like I say my competitor has data which can take my concepts further so the argument is nullified.