- Original Poster
- #1
Hi all,
(In the name of 'privacy' please excuse if i keep this 'fictional').....
Company A has a fleet of vans. The vans remain with the relevant employees who drive them to and from their homes. The company is happy to accept private use of the vans by its drivers. The company has a policy that provided such use does not exceed (lets say...) 100 miles a year then its is counted as insignificant and they will not refer it to the tax office (so employee does not get taxed for having a van). So far so good and i think in line (for the most part) with HMRC own advice on private use of vans etc. But.....
The company requires the employees to report whatever private miles they do and they get billed accordingly for the fuel.
Now, I cant help but think if you are billing for the fuel, then the company is, in effect, saying this is not insignificant, so if i was HMRC, id tend to say the same and would expect it to be recorded for tax.
Am I wrong ?
To sum up, my thinking is that if HMRC say an employee going slightly out of their way to get a newspaper is counted as insignificant, then the company cant charge for that miles, otherwise they are making it 'significant'.
I should also add that i dont have a preference (or anything to gain) from either side of the argument, im just interested in others thoughts out of professional curiosity
Thanks
(In the name of 'privacy' please excuse if i keep this 'fictional').....
Company A has a fleet of vans. The vans remain with the relevant employees who drive them to and from their homes. The company is happy to accept private use of the vans by its drivers. The company has a policy that provided such use does not exceed (lets say...) 100 miles a year then its is counted as insignificant and they will not refer it to the tax office (so employee does not get taxed for having a van). So far so good and i think in line (for the most part) with HMRC own advice on private use of vans etc. But.....
The company requires the employees to report whatever private miles they do and they get billed accordingly for the fuel.
Now, I cant help but think if you are billing for the fuel, then the company is, in effect, saying this is not insignificant, so if i was HMRC, id tend to say the same and would expect it to be recorded for tax.
Am I wrong ?
To sum up, my thinking is that if HMRC say an employee going slightly out of their way to get a newspaper is counted as insignificant, then the company cant charge for that miles, otherwise they are making it 'significant'.
I should also add that i dont have a preference (or anything to gain) from either side of the argument, im just interested in others thoughts out of professional curiosity
Thanks