A
Arcadian
- Original Poster
- #1
First of all, please forgive me (or move or delete ....
) if this is covered in another thread.
We have an existing conservatory with a wall against our neighbour's garden (1930s terraced house). We need to replace the conservatory with a new one. As I understand it, the Party Wall Act 1996 requires us to give notice to our neighbour specifiying works etc etc and she then agrees to it.She would, there is no problem there.
However, the conservatory company expect us to get an Award - the thing where 1 - 3 surveyors get together and decide what can be done and get a solicitor involved. It's my understanding - with my 27 year old law degree - that the Award/multiple surveyors procedure is only brought into play when there is a disagreement about work to be done. Indeed it seems to me that having one of those in place would wrongly suggest to a future purchaser that there had in fact been a dispute, and who would want to buy a property where there was even a hint of a dispute with a neighbour??
Problem - when you ask a surveyor or solicitor what's needed they will naturally tell you the whole shebang. OK, maybe I'm being cynical. I have no objection to following correct procedure and paying appropriate fees but surely this act was brought it to simplify things not to get everyone running to lawyers.
I'd love to hear of other members' experiences with this.
We have an existing conservatory with a wall against our neighbour's garden (1930s terraced house). We need to replace the conservatory with a new one. As I understand it, the Party Wall Act 1996 requires us to give notice to our neighbour specifiying works etc etc and she then agrees to it.She would, there is no problem there.
However, the conservatory company expect us to get an Award - the thing where 1 - 3 surveyors get together and decide what can be done and get a solicitor involved. It's my understanding - with my 27 year old law degree - that the Award/multiple surveyors procedure is only brought into play when there is a disagreement about work to be done. Indeed it seems to me that having one of those in place would wrongly suggest to a future purchaser that there had in fact been a dispute, and who would want to buy a property where there was even a hint of a dispute with a neighbour??
Problem - when you ask a surveyor or solicitor what's needed they will naturally tell you the whole shebang. OK, maybe I'm being cynical. I have no objection to following correct procedure and paying appropriate fees but surely this act was brought it to simplify things not to get everyone running to lawyers.
I'd love to hear of other members' experiences with this.
