Nerissa Gliders

Swisaw

Free Member
Sep 24, 2010
1,849
149
London
For crossing a river your concept is a 'possibility'.
But then there are anchored rope 'ferry' designs that do this purely by the current of the water, without any need to climb a high tower - so your design has already lost in efficiency to them.

For longer trips your design has massive issues - speed/air resistance and further energy loss problems with a massive rope are very obvious ones.
That's of course ignoring that the energy still has to be put in to the system in the first place - the items to be transported have to be lifted to the required height.




Not so in cases like Woolwich Ferry, which now have cost tax payers £10.70 million for an 18-month operating contract and takes over 6.00minutes per crossing, excluding embarking and disembarking. That wouldn't be so with Nerissa Gliders as a vehicle ferry. Practically, it should do a crossing for a minute more or less including embarking and disembarking. In addition to that it recovers potential energy of the vehicles carried across.


Woolwich Ferry boats have two 500.00 hp diesel engines and a tonnage of 738.00 tones with a capacity of 500.00 passengers and 200.00 tone vehicles. This makes a gross weight of almost 1000.00 tons per boat. For the same capacity, Narissa Gliders can have a gross weight of under 400.00 tones. Additionally, it should be possible to recover potential energy of at least half of its cargoes per crossing. This recovered potential energy should be at least 20.00MJ per crossing, which can be converted to electricity and fed into National Grid to generate a handsome earning for the tax payers. Nerissa Gliders, as Woolwich Ferry, should reduce waiting time and traffic congestion to a negligible point. This encourages more traffic to come to use it, which means more earning for tax payers. Simply this means Nerissa Gliders, as Woolwich Ferry, shouldn't cost tax payers any thing and possibly it will earn some thing for them, tax payers.


For longer trips, the issues you have raised are almost negligible. The system is not driven by ropes, it is driven by gravity or driving wheels on the pillars. Obviously it can be made to travel a lot faster than bullet or magnet trains because it can do without air. Fast trains need air to press them down against rails to get good traction. Aeroplanes need air to fly, swim, through. So you have to design trains and aeroplanes to use air but these designs create more air resistance. With Nerissa Gliders, you don't need these designs. Because it is a hanging glider travels on supports. You can design it like a cylinder in the middle with long cones at the front and back. In this way, you almost overcome 99% air resistance and drag. Driving wheels of Nerissa Gliders can be made as two, one on the top of the other, to sandwich the feet between them to give it a maximum traction.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

MikeJ

Free Member
Jan 15, 2008
6,951
2,248
Northumbeland
You can't recover potential energy. The whole point of potential energy is that it's potential. You can recover dynamic energy, and turn it back into potential energy. Or you can turn potential energy into dynamic energy (accepting that you're never going to be 100% efficient in doing so).
 
Upvote 0

Swisaw

Free Member
Sep 24, 2010
1,849
149
London
You can't recover potential energy. The whole point of potential energy is that it's potential. You can recover dynamic energy, and turn it back into potential energy. Or you can turn potential energy into dynamic energy (accepting that you're never going to be 100% efficient in doing so).

Fair enough. But every one understands that is what I mean exactly. While the glider is stationary, it has a potential energy of weight x height x gravity. when it glides downward,this potential energy converts to dynamic energy, some of which can be converted back to potential energy.
 
Upvote 0
D

DancingWithPoodles

i can see this work because it will be easy for the government to recoup the money. for example they can have stops in between Glasgow and London in the air kind of shop and passengers can shop and because there is no alternative they will have to buy water and other crap from the air shop
 
Upvote 0
Surely, I'm not the only one bored by fag packet physics now? OP, your idea of cheap free travel is laudable but the physics is way, way off. Jump onto a physics forum and give a go there, you will soon find out why!

Investors are not as stupid as some :D look, they will check the figures and you will come out of it looking like someone trying to sell an elevator to the moon.

Mod, can we close it now?
 
Upvote 0
Surely, I'm not the only one bored by fag packet physics now? OP, your idea of cheap /free travel is laudable but the physics is way, way off. Jump onto a physics forum and give a go there, you will soon find out why!

Investors are not as stupid as some :D look, they will check the figures and you will come out of it looking like someone trying to sell an elevator to the moon.

Mod, can we close it now?
 
Upvote 0
I've had a good idea, why not one like Charlie and the Chocolate factory?
As it is glass and therefore really only sand (silica) it is the same as sand found in a hour glass which measures time and therefore is time itself.

Hey presto I have invented a time machine, anyone want to lend me 200K to build it? :)
 
Upvote 0

oldeagleeye

Free Member
Jul 16, 2008
4,001
1,210
Essex
This is a complete wind up.

Our chummy is looking for mugs to sell these things and he promises them millions. Before all that of course they would have to cough up unspecified sums of money to buy part rights to the drawings.

Come on now Rahman. How much do you want for a share in the glider project which I understand I would also have to give you 50% of every one I sold.

What about the Lift Energy Converter that take take the energy from the decending lift and drive it back to the top again with only the aide of a toy electric motor and a pp3 battery.

Now that really is a cracker. I could go for that one. Come on now then how much for a half share. I can make you rich. I could sell 500 in Angola by the weekend.:rolleyes:

http://www.thrilling.me.uk/entrep1.html

NOW WILL THE REAL RAHMAN PLEASE STAND UP. THE ONE THAT IS GOING TO BE THE RICHEST MAN IN THE WORLD SOLVING OUR ENERGY PROBLEMS WITH HIS 'GLIDER'

IS HE ANOTHER ISSAC NEWTON - ANOTHER EINSTEIN. WE NO EXACTLY FOLKS

HE IS - WAIT FOR IT -NOT IT'S NOT EVEN DELBOY.

Just another white van man with a respray to cover up the cracks on the 20 year old transit:eek::rolleyes:.

BTW. Look carefully and your see it didn't quite make it up the hill before the pp3batteryran out.

http://www.ukbusinessforums.co.uk/f.../8479/vanside.gif[/IMG][/URL] Uploaded with Uploaded with ImageShack.us
 
Upvote 0
This is a complete wind up.

thrilling.me.uk/entrep1.html

OMG :eek:
If you fancy a laugh have a look at this guys web site!!!!!! Someone fetch me a one piece quilted jacket with arms that tie at the back :|

The OP has some serious issues, how does he manage to convince anyone he is not deluded/mad.

Seriously, while we have all had a bit of a laugh at this guys expense I think it is time to put him (and us) out of our misery!

Mod - pull the plug old chap using some freely obtained green energy to make up for the pollution the OP is pushing around London town with his clapped out old van.

Reminds me of a sketch with Kevin Turvey, Pollution sometimes up, sometimes down but always arwoound, are you coming to my town or am I coming to yours? :D
 
Upvote 0

Swisaw

Free Member
Sep 24, 2010
1,849
149
London
OMG :eek:
If you fancy a laugh have a look at this guys web site!!!!!! Someone fetch me a one piece quilted jacket with arms that tie at the back :|

The OP has some serious issues, how does he manage to convince anyone he is not deluded/mad.

Seriously, while we have all had a bit of a laugh at this guys expense I think it is time to put him (and us) out of our misery!

Mod - pull the plug old chap using some freely obtained green energy to make up for the pollution the OP is pushing around London town with his clapped out old van.

Reminds me of a sketch with Kevin Turvey, Pollution sometimes up, sometimes down but always arwoound, are you coming to my town or am I coming to yours? :D

Some of you really hard-hearted. If you don't like the idea, that is fair enough. But it is not fair to ask Mod against it.
 
Upvote 0

Swisaw

Free Member
Sep 24, 2010
1,849
149
London
This is a complete wind up.

Our chummy is looking for mugs to sell these things and he promises them millions. Before all that of course they would have to cough up unspecified sums of money to buy part rights to the drawings.

Come on now Rahman. How much do you want for a share in the glider project which I understand I would also have to give you 50% of every one I sold.

What about the Lift Energy Converter that take take the energy from the decending lift and drive it back to the top again with only the aide of a toy electric motor and a pp3 battery.

Now that really is a cracker. I could go for that one. Come on now then how much for a half share. I can make you rich. I could sell 500 in Angola by the weekend.:rolleyes:

http://www.thrilling.me.uk/entrep1.html

NOW WILL THE REAL RAHMAN PLEASE STAND UP. THE ONE THAT IS GOING TO BE THE RICHEST MAN IN THE WORLD SOLVING OUR ENERGY PROBLEMS WITH HIS 'GLIDER'

IS HE ANOTHER ISSAC NEWTON - ANOTHER EINSTEIN. WE NO EXACTLY FOLKS

HE IS - WAIT FOR IT -NOT IT'S NOT EVEN DELBOY.

Just another white van man with a respray to cover up the cracks on the 20 year old transit:eek::rolleyes:.

BTW. Look carefully and your see it didn't quite make it up the hill before the pp3batteryran out.

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

No, it is a blue van man.

Best regards from Rahman
 
Upvote 0

Swisaw

Free Member
Sep 24, 2010
1,849
149
London
OMG :eek:
If you fancy a laugh have a look at this guys web site!!!!!! Someone fetch me a one piece quilted jacket with arms that tie at the back :|

The OP has some serious issues, how does he manage to convince anyone he is not deluded/mad.

Seriously, while we have all had a bit of a laugh at this guys expense I think it is time to put him (and us) out of our misery!

Mod - pull the plug old chap using some freely obtained green energy to make up for the pollution the OP is pushing around London town with his clapped out old van.

Reminds me of a sketch with Kevin Turvey, Pollution sometimes up, sometimes down but always arwoound, are you coming to my town or am I coming to yours? :D

You welcome to lough at me as much as you like. But it is not fair to ask Mods against this post.
 
Upvote 0

Swisaw

Free Member
Sep 24, 2010
1,849
149
London
Surely, I'm not the only one bored by fag packet physics now? OP, your idea of cheap free travel is laudable but the physics is way, way off. Jump onto a physics forum and give a go there, you will soon find out why!

Investors are not as stupid as some :D look, they will check the figures and you will come out of it looking like someone trying to sell an elevator to the moon.

Mod, can we close it now?

I put it on physics forum. So far over 100 people read it but no one has commented.
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=470538

Obviously if the idea was wrong technically, some one would have mentioned it. At least the Mods would have commented on it.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

MikeJ

Free Member
Jan 15, 2008
6,951
2,248
Northumbeland
You're right it was Rik Mayall but when he played the character Kevin Turvey, remember him saying Kevin Turvey ear and sticking his thumb in his ear?

Feel free to comment on my business knowledge, but never, ever question my knowledge of The Young Ones. :D

Opening lines to the episode "Bomb". Unless he did the same thing as Kevin Turvey...

http://www.4q.dk/theyoungones-03-bomb.php
 
Upvote 0

oldeagleeye

Free Member
Jul 16, 2008
4,001
1,210
Essex
I put it on physics forum. So far over 100 people read it but no one has commented.
http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=470538

Obviously if the idea was wrong technically, some one would have mentioned it. At least the Mods would have commented on it.

The physics forum obviously showed their utter contempt by NOT bothering to answer your childish claims and the Mods are not allowed to psssssse themselves laughing.

Suggest you stick to the day job mate.

Rob
 
Upvote 0

ORDERED WEB

Free Member
Jun 30, 2009
1,650
394
Cyprus / LONDON
The physics forum obviously showed their utter contempt by NOT bothering to answer your childish claims and the Mods are not allowed to psssssse themselves laughing.

Suggest you stick to the day job mate.

Rob
To be fair, it is most likely the presentation

If the OP reposted the idea, and skipped the story and got down to the physics, they will probrably look and discuss it. Most people wont click on a link that is preceded about a story, from a poster with 1 post
 
Upvote 0
I think too much is being done at the moment to create "enivornmental solutions" which entirely ignores "good for the environment" in a holistic sense.

The 'Car scrappage scheme' is a particularly ugly example - instead of keeping existing working (they had to have MOT, etc) vehicles on the road, we'll throw them away, then build new cars which get slightly better fuel consumption.
Ignoring that there's massive environmental impact in building new cars and everything else involved in the process - while servicing older cars and keeping them on the road not only employs British people but cuts out a hell of a lot of pollution, etc.

Electric cars are another one really being pushed, when over-all people are ignoring the many issues with disposal of batteries, etc.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

Newcott

Free Member
Jul 9, 2010
1,472
303
London
gmoto - the scrappage scheme main objective was to boost sales across Europe - they kinda tagged the whole green element afterwards.

Agreed though there's a big difference in what gets carried out and whats actually good for the enviroment.

Renewable soruces need to be looked at from and objective point of view - not just what has the biggest grant system from what I've read wing farms are a huge old drain and don't actually re-coup anywhere near the ammount.

Solar doesn't work too well for Uk levels.

Wave tec could be a good one and also save the issue of errosion in some places at the same time.
 
Upvote 0
Yea - I wasn't sure the new vehicle automotive industry really needed that much of a boost over so many others. For instance, how about giving a boost to car servicing with government funding - get existing cars working more efficiently and safer.

As far as CO2 emissions go, wind farms also tend to be pretty bad due to the amount of concrete used (also pertinent to the OP) - it can take a hell of a long time for that to be 'recovered' when you consider the 'saved' CO2 from having more 'green' energy.
 
Upvote 0

Swisaw

Free Member
Sep 24, 2010
1,849
149
London
Yea - I wasn't sure the new vehicle automotive industry really needed that much of a boost over so many others. For instance, how about giving a boost to car servicing with government funding - get existing cars working more efficiently and safer.

As far as CO2 emissions go, wind farms also tend to be pretty bad due to the amount of concrete used (also pertinent to the OP) - it can take a hell of a long time for that to be 'recovered' when you consider the 'saved' CO2 from having more 'green' energy.

Concrete absorbs co2 from air:
http://www.materia.nl/563.0.html?&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=202&tx_ttnews[backPid]=534&cHash=e921cf6825
 
Upvote 0
A quick google shows that Co2 from normal concrete comes to around 40% from fuels used for creation and 60% from calcination. Over a 100 year time period, concrete my re-absorb 57% of the Co2 that was released due to calcination. So after a 100 years you may have re-absorbed around a third of the Co2 initially released.

The concrete in your link is described as having a 'relatively short time weather resistance time', which doesn't sound very good!
 
Upvote 0

Swisaw

Free Member
Sep 24, 2010
1,849
149
London
A quick google shows that Co2 from normal concrete comes to around 40% from fuels used for creation and 60% from calcination. Over a 100 year time period, concrete my re-absorb 57% of the Co2 that was released due to calcination. So after a 100 years you may have re-absorbed around a third of the Co2 initially released.

The concrete in your link is described as having a 'relatively short time weather resistance time', which doesn't sound very good!


In that case you don't have a choice, you have to go for Nerissa Gliders and my frictionless brake power recovery and reuse invention, as well as other green energy forms and tree plantation to reduce CO2.


My frictionless brake and shock absorber power recovery and reuse invention on this link: http://thrilling.me.uk/super.html could reduce fuel consumption for a vehicle driven in the city by as much as half. In addition to that it eliminates the need for brake pads and shoes, which are major sources of air pollution.


With Nerissa Gliders, you could reduce the need for energy by as much as two third and use green energy entirely. Lets go back to London and Glasgow to build a route for Nerissa Gliders on the same level between both points. Glasgow is 59.00 metres above sea level at Bishopton and London 24.00 metres above sea level. So our Nerissa Gliders Station in London has to be 59.00 - 24.00 = 35.00 metres high to be at the same level as in Glasgow. So we have to drive our vehicles to a 35.00 metre high to reach Nerissa Gliders Station in London. This obviously creates more co2 but we have eliminated co2 creation along a route of almost 600,000.00metres long between both points and in Glasgow the station is on the ground level, it doesn't cause any extra co2.


Nerissa Gliders in this case travels on the same level between both points. So it needs a minimum use of energy. Bear in mind unlike other means of transportations like trains and aeroplanes, Nerissa Gliders doesn't carry the engine, the fuel, wheels, gear boxes and other associated parts. Just the elimination of these loads should reduce energy needs by at least one third. So a few windmills along the route should provide green energy more than enough to operate Nerissa Gliders. Let the windmills to pump up water to high points and then use the potential energy of water to drive Nerissa Gliders.


Grow millions of trees along the route, where ever possible to counter co2 produced by pillars or supports made from concrete. Alternatively, why don't build supports from wood, a good reason to encourage forestation to grow trees.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
So, let me get this one point straight -
You expect the basics of a trip from Glasgow to London to be 'powered' entirely by a 35 meter elevation difference?

(I know you did mention water etc, but you're suggesting that's just a bit of an extra it seems.)
 
Upvote 0

oldeagleeye

Free Member
Jul 16, 2008
4,001
1,210
Essex
You have got to hand it to the guy. He really could sell snake oil.

I mean yesterday a supersonic glider powered by a garden hose. Impressive but nothing compared to London's problem caused by climate change. Built on the flood plains of the South East most scientists agree that a 1 inch rise in sea levels will see the whole of the South East under water.

Rahams solution. Now he has raised London 75 ft above sea level.

Amazing what you can do with a £2 Lego Set isn't it.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
I think his other invention has more scope:

"
Advertising, gem, health and amusement equipment manufacturers are interested to make SWISAW ™, which even can be made as soft rocking bed for babies or a rocking bed for adults, especially courting couples. No girl will ever refuses you her heart on a bed of SWISAW ™. When you take her home, invite her to try the thrill of Swisaw ™. After a few minutes of her being swisawed gently, she enters the world of romance and invites you to take her heart. On the other hand, you can use your Swisaw ™ to swisaw your body to the bones when you are bored or after a hard days of work to get rid of all the pains and aches in your body."

Pure genius, and perfect for Valentine's Day. Where can I get one?
 
Upvote 0

Swisaw

Free Member
Sep 24, 2010
1,849
149
London
I think his other invention has more scope:

"Advertising, gem, health and amusement equipment manufacturers are interested to make SWISAW ™, which even can be made as soft rocking bed for babies or a rocking bed for adults, especially courting couples. No girl will ever refuses you her heart on a bed of SWISAW ™. When you take her home, invite her to try the thrill of Swisaw ™. After a few minutes of her being swisawed gently, she enters the world of romance and invites you to take her heart. On the other hand, you can use your Swisaw ™ to swisaw your body to the bones when you are bored or after a hard days of work to get rid of all the pains and aches in your body."

Pure genius, and perfect for Valentine's Day. Where can I get one?

Swisaw still patent pending. Any interested party welcomes to take over it over or becomes my partner. Swisaw can be made for all different sorts of markets from full children markets to the full adult and business markets to niche markets of hollywood type customers as well as gift markets like Valentine's Day presents for the upper class.

http://thrilling.me.uk
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Swisaw

Free Member
Sep 24, 2010
1,849
149
London
So, let me get this one point straight -
You expect the basics of a trip from Glasgow to London to be 'powered' entirely by a 35 meter elevation difference?

(I know you did mention water etc, but you're suggesting that's just a bit of an extra it seems.)


35.00 metre is a difference of heights over sea level between London and Glasgow. In this case, Glasgow is higher than London by 35.00metres over sea level. We can not have a practicable slope for Nerissa Gliders on long routes like between Glasgow and London. But in this case, we can at least benefit from an equal level route between both points. To get an equal level route between both points, Nerissa gliders Station in London has to be 35.00 metres high. But the station in Glasgow is going to be on the ground level.


Obviously this means we have to use energy to drive the glider but because the glider moves on an equal level route the energy needed is going to be a fraction of the energy used for trains or aeroplanes between both points. The glider saves further more energy because it doesn't carry the engine, the wheels, the gear box and other associated parts, something which all other means of transportation have to carry at the cost of more fuel consumption and more wears and tears.


The wear and tear on Nerissa Gliders almost becomes negligible. Only rollers bear wears and tears but they need service only after long periods of time like years. Because they are not always being used. When they are used, they get used for a few seconds only. On the long routes, the glider can has some sort of aerodynamic means to give it a bit of air lift to reduce the thrust on rollers. This should prolong service time period for rollers for years.

Nerissa Gliders still patent pending. Any entity welcomes to take it over or become my partner.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Swisaw

Free Member
Sep 24, 2010
1,849
149
London
is there a photo/video of a working Swisaw available? your website doesn't give much info & i really can't get my head around what this contraption actually is - side to side and up & down at the same time?? i feel sea-sick...

I don't mind to send you technical details. Please see my confidetnial none disclosure form.
 
Upvote 0

Latest Articles

Join UK Business Forums for free business advice