By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
Interesting, I'm not sure why that would be the case. So far as I'm aware, we haven't made any adjustments to the feed that would change this.This link which is supposed to be that of the last posting in Time Out on ****** assets takes me straight to the first posting by @The Byre and not to the one shown :
https://www.ukbusinessforums.co.uk/...ning-out-to-be-rat-poison-again.420968/unread
Ok I can see where the issue may lie. The last posting entry tells me that @japancool made a posting 12 minutes ago but what the heading is actually referring to is the fact that @japancool viewed the thread 12 minutes ago.
And so the link description has nothing to do with a posting but rather a viewing - which is odd behaviour.
The links are currently set up to take you to the first "unread" post within the thread.You can also see that the link purportedly for the last messsge 181 in the time-out section is really a link to messsge 1.
More ****** companies turning out to be rat poison again!
Completely agree.Thanks - it seems you have thought of everything. It is good to allow the user to see who has posted the last message but not so intuitive to then send the user to the first post- which then requires the user to scroll through all the messages to get to the message which was the carrot in the first place!
It is something which may need to be re-considered - if 8 out of 10 say it's a damn nuisance (or the opposite) then that would provide a steer.
The logic of obliging the user to first read the OP's original message is not a bad idea provided the user wants to read it first.