Legally Robbed .. Advice needed!

You probably need to seek the formal advice from an experienced solicitor.

It (i.e. the fraud) may have criminal implications as well as possible perjury.

I hope you have deep pockets and long arms as, in my experience, fraud cases are very expensive to pursue and will take many months if not years to finalise with no guarantee of your desired outcome.

See what a solicitor says.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xLulzx
Upvote 0

Bill Ryan

Free Member
Feb 2, 2009
334
82
Wiltshire
There is potentially as case for perverting the course of justice (as mentioned before) which relates to deliberately making false statements to win the case.

The unjust enrichment side looks like a fraud or 'uttering a false instrument' or some other fraud/dishonesty offence.

As mentioned above proof is the key.

First port of call is the police.
 
  • Like
Reactions: xLulzx
Upvote 0

xLulzx

Free Member
Jan 11, 2012
19
0
Yes it was in Count Court, £200,000 thats with the Solicitor fees aswel, the fraudster was a tenant that made out he was intimidated etc and suffering from stress, would there of had to of been his medical records put to the Court to prove this ???

The defendant solicitor wasn't very good everyone has told him he's been legally robbed, he went to the Police they didn't want to know.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
Yes there is proof, the guy that was meant to have writ the bogus bill went to Court and said that he didn't write it, and still the fraudster won the case, the defendant has to pay out around £200,000

There has to be much more to this case than being told here. A court knowing a bill is bogus still finds for the person confirmng not to have written it seems a little odd here
 
Upvote 0
If the Defendant had instructed a solicitor then this outcome should not have been a complete surprise to him! If they are unhappy then they should seek the advice of another solicitor.

I would suggest that they re-read the letters of advice they received from their solicitor as in my experience it is often a refusal to believe the law than anyone getting things wrong.
 
Upvote 0

xLulzx

Free Member
Jan 11, 2012
19
0
My mistake the Defendant noticed the Bogus bills while they was sorting the financial part out, the Defendant in the end asked his solicitor to disengage himself from the case and to release his files, apparently the solicitor has had a nervous breakdown.
 
Upvote 0
S

Steve Sellers

My mistake the Defendant noticed the Bogus bills while they was sorting the financial part out, the Defendant in the end asked his solicitor to disengage himself from the case and to release his files, apparently the solicitor has had a nervous breakdown.

So you're not the defendant, and from what you said above you are not the Claimant. Please don't tell me you are the judge! :|:|:| :D
 
Upvote 0

xLulzx

Free Member
Jan 11, 2012
19
0
It's the way in which you use English, and respond to the comments of others. It reads, to me, quite automated - although it is clearly not.

How did you say you know the parties in the case? Or were you just an observer?

Sorry i've had a bad headache the last few days that's why my replies have been brief also I have dyslexia so I keeps to basic words.

It was a family member so observed what went on with the case.
 
Upvote 0

Latest Articles