- Original Poster
- #1
I was speaking to a good friend of mine this weekend and his business is really struggling. He said business has been slow for a couple of years and as a result he’s run behind on bills. He’s got arrears with Electricity Co (and subsequently is now on out of contract rates which to me look ridiculously high), arrears on his business rates, water rates and owes about £80k to HMRC for VAT.
He said the business has a payment arrangement with HMRC to repay the VAT monthly and has a temporary arrangement with the council to pay his business rates at a lower figure for 3 months but he’s even struggling to pay that. He’s not yet got an arrangement with electricity or water as he can’t afford what they are asking.
He’s already had a HMRC enforcement agent at the premises which is what prompted his payment arrangement.
Anyway, he was asking me whether, in his shoes, I would consider the company insolvent and therefore time to close it down, to which I said yes.
So, now he is looking at what steps he needs to take and was talking about trying to keep his business premises for his other business.
I said in my opinion he’d be better off finding a new premises where HMRC aren’t likely to turn up to try and collect the previous companies debt while he waits for the company to close but he’s being quite stubborn.
So, I thought I’d ask in here and see what you all think:
1) is it a good (or at least valid) idea to keep the same premises while you’re closing a company down with a fair amount of debt? Presuming he would tell energy co/council that company a has gone bust and so company b will start its liability with a clean slate.
2) say the company takes a year or more to close via the SpongeBob method, what is the likelihood of HMRC sending enforcement agents round to try and enforce their debt?
3) is there a generally accepted way of calculating what value the director should of the insolvent company for its minimal assets?
He said the business has a payment arrangement with HMRC to repay the VAT monthly and has a temporary arrangement with the council to pay his business rates at a lower figure for 3 months but he’s even struggling to pay that. He’s not yet got an arrangement with electricity or water as he can’t afford what they are asking.
He’s already had a HMRC enforcement agent at the premises which is what prompted his payment arrangement.
Anyway, he was asking me whether, in his shoes, I would consider the company insolvent and therefore time to close it down, to which I said yes.
So, now he is looking at what steps he needs to take and was talking about trying to keep his business premises for his other business.
I said in my opinion he’d be better off finding a new premises where HMRC aren’t likely to turn up to try and collect the previous companies debt while he waits for the company to close but he’s being quite stubborn.
So, I thought I’d ask in here and see what you all think:
1) is it a good (or at least valid) idea to keep the same premises while you’re closing a company down with a fair amount of debt? Presuming he would tell energy co/council that company a has gone bust and so company b will start its liability with a clean slate.
2) say the company takes a year or more to close via the SpongeBob method, what is the likelihood of HMRC sending enforcement agents round to try and enforce their debt?
3) is there a generally accepted way of calculating what value the director should of the insolvent company for its minimal assets?
