By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
Original Post:
Lost a client 4 years ago and they've asked for some info back to 2018.I thought payroll was 3 years but accounts and tax 6 plus current. Is that correct?
If CIS, would that be the longer of the two?
Lost a client 4 years ago and they've asked for some info back to 2018.I thought payroll was 3 years but accounts and tax 6 plus current. Is that correct?
If CIS, would that be the longer of the two?
6 and 3 is correct from the end of the last year you dealt with.Lost a client 4 years ago and they've asked for some info back to 2018.I thought payroll was 3 years but accounts and tax 6 plus current. Is that correct?
If CIS, would that be the longer of the two?
someone suggested charging for the past date6 and 3 is correct from the end of the last year you dealt with.
CIS is usually 6 years for the Contractor, so this would depend on which services you provided.
In this digital age there seems no reason why you would not have records going back further than this.
But I would be more concerned about why an ex client is looking for data from so far back.
That’s your prerogative I suppose, seems a bit petty to me if you have the information readily available.Someone mentioned to me that if a client requests historical data after six years, it’s reasonable to charge a fee for retrieving it.
Yes, I agree with you. It's harsh to charge for every little thing.That’s your prerogative I suppose, seems a bit petty to me if you have the information readily available.
If not then just say you no longer hold the data, or charge them.
I personally would not have a problem supplying an ex client with a reasonable information request free of charge.
I think there is a big problem that some accountants charge for every little thing they do rather than actually providing a service for their clients.
Have you considered, in accordance with the terms of engagement, whether these are property of the Company or property of the firm?Lost a client 4 years ago and they've asked for some info back to 2018.I thought payroll was 3 years but accounts and tax 6 plus current. Is that correct?
If CIS, would that be the longer of the two?
That is how long THE COMPANY (your ex-client) needs to keep their records for.Lost a client 4 years ago and they've asked for some info back to 2018.I thought payroll was 3 years but accounts and tax 6 plus current. Is that correct?
If CIS, would that be the longer of the two?
Accountants are required to keep hold of records for both existing and ex clients, normal practice is 6 years.If they are an ex-client why do you still have the documents? If they aren’t paying for storage you probably shouldn’t even have them.
OK, but should you charge storage for this service? I know solicitors box everything up and put the files in secure storage and you pay for this service.Accountants are required to keep hold of records for both existing and ex clients, normal practice is 6 years.
I do the same, any paper records are scanned and returned to client so all data is digital, no I would not charge for storage of digital files.OK, but should you charge storage for this service? I know solicitors box everything up and put the files in secure storage and you pay for this service.
As an aside, my accountant doesn't keep any paper records. It's all scanned and the originals returns to the client.
A client’s cheque for storage secures a cupboard, not a claim of ownership; it is rent, not right.If they are an ex-client why do you still have the documents? If they aren’t paying for storage you probably shouldn’t even have them.
Any reference for this requirement?Accountants are required to keep hold of records for both existing and ex clients, normal practice is 6 years.
Not to hand no, but it is something I would have have looked into when I first started my practice and then adopted, it would have come from one of the Governing bodies, possibly ICAEW, not sure but I also seem to remember that AML regs also mention document retention.Any reference for this requirement?