EU Nutjobs - Thankfully I will not be running a business by 2050

Siim Kallas, the EU transport commission, insisted that Brussels directives and new taxation of fuel would be used to force people out of their cars and onto "alternative" means of transport.




"That means no more conventionally fuelled cars in our city centres," he said. "Action will follow, legislation, real action to change behaviour."



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/8411336/EU-to-ban-cars-from-cities-by-2050.html

"I suggest that he goes and finds himself a space in the local mental asylum," said Hugh Bladon, a spokesman for the BDA.
Imagine the queue, that's one huge asylum.
 
Well they may be nutters but they're effective nutters.

People are already being forced out of their cars and on to public..oh wait no there is no public transport.

No joined up thinking is there.

It's going to be like Mad Max by 2050.
 
Upvote 0
The EU are good for certain B2B and trade agreements etc. As well as sharing data information and joint scientific projects, however, the cost of all of this seriously needs looking at. It's the waste that gets me. I don't mind paying huge amounts in tax if we reap the benefits, i just don't see us reaping anything other than inflated prices at the moment.

It's not like i can hark back to the old days in black and white..i'm only 24 and already the country has changed massively in the last decade..not always for the better. (NOTE there have been some advances in technology, health, science, business blah blah but in other areas we have taken huge steps backwards).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0
This is a quote from Monsieur Whatshisname's Press release today :-

"Transport 2050 is a roadmap for a competitive transport sector that increases mobility and cuts emissions. We can and we must do both. The widely held belief that you need to cut mobility to fight climate change is simply not true. Competitive transport systems are vital for Europe's ability to compete in the world, for economic growth, job creation and for peoples' everyday quality of life. Curbing mobility is not an option; neither is business as usual. We can break the transport system's dependence on oil without sacrificing its efficiency and compromising mobility. It can be win–win."

What is not reported is exactly how we can maintain let alone increase mobility [ congestion charge anyone ?] plus cut emissions without introducing new technology that so far as I can tell does not yet exist and certainly not to the extent that it needs to to provide any real alternative for the majority of us.[See below]

Part of me thinks this is just another version of the now rather tired Labour/leftist/environmentalist argument in favour of "integrated [public] transport sytems" - which none of them could ever design and which never materialised.It never materialised because it was never viable - just a political pipedream.Nobody but nobody lives within walking distance (still less a single bus ride of their work any more.How many Council workers do ???

If you drive from city to city during the day for business rather than just to go shopping you will see how much of this country's business depends on transport.That means cars - vans and HGVs.Plus unleade and diesel.

On the other hand maybe this is a good time to read up on how to breed very strong and very fast horses :p
 
Upvote 0
This is a quote from Monsieur Whatshisname's Press release today :-

"Transport 2050 is a roadmap for a competitive transport sector that increases mobility and cuts emissions. We can and we must do both. The widely held belief that you need to cut mobility to fight climate change is simply not true. Competitive transport systems are vital for Europe's ability to compete in the world, for economic growth, job creation and for peoples' everyday quality of life. Curbing mobility is not an option; neither is business as usual. We can break the transport system's dependence on oil without sacrificing its efficiency and compromising mobility. It can be win-win."

What is not reported is exactly how we can maintain let alone increase mobility [ congestion charge anyone ?] plus cut emissions without introducing new technology that so far as I can tell does not yet exist and certainly not to the extent that it needs to to provide any real alternative for the majority of us.[See below]

Part of me thinks this is just another version of the now rather tired Labour/leftist/environmentalist argument in favour of "integrated [public] transport sytems" - which none of them could ever design and which never materialised.It never materialised because it was never viable - just a political pipedream.Nobody but nobody lives within walking distance (still less a single bus ride of their work any more.How many Council workers do ???

If you drive from city to city during the day for business rather than just to go shopping you will see how much of this country's business depends on transport.That means cars - vans and HGVs.Plus unleaded and diesel.

On the other hand maybe this is a good time to read up on how to breed very strong and very fast horses :p
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Latest Articles