- Original Poster
- #1
I'm a bit lost and could do with some advice. We have a company that now has grown over the years from having none to 30 staff. Of those half are full time, the others are part time and all have fixed, contracted hours with proper contracts, of course.
I got a HR Lawyer to help initially with setting up our Contract of Employment and Staff Handbook and we subscribe to a company that provides us with other policies and procedures that covers virtually everything - holidays, discipline, recruitment the whole lot.
Problem is we have all the policies but are finding it difficult to get one person to apply them. One of us does recruitment, one does updating records, another does payroll, another does this and that and so on. We have Department Managers with average of 4/5 staff each but none of them are skilled or have any knowledge of HR which is just the way we have evolved. We struggle with the basics such as supervisions, timekeeping, discipline, holidays and so on because the Department Heads are not able to do these things and we have the age old problem of them all being really friendly with the staff and being too emotionally attached to do things by the book. We have a General Manager who really doesn't know about HR (as we are now finding out) and tends to devolve this to us as the owners of the company and just adds to the problem rather than sorts it.
My opinion is that we need a HR manager who is completely new to the company who will see things in black and white and set up systems, procedures and policies to get everything back on track and give what I would call a flat line approach (treat everyone the same irrespective of personal attachments or emotion) and manage everyone including the General Manager.
Does what I say make sense? If I get a HR manager what would I expect to pay a decent one, and is it reasonable to expect having not had one before that they would fit into the organisation at a higher level than everyone except us the owners? Does HR usually do payroll, pensions and sick pay and so on?
Lots of questions but really at a crossroads on this one and could do with some direction.
I got a HR Lawyer to help initially with setting up our Contract of Employment and Staff Handbook and we subscribe to a company that provides us with other policies and procedures that covers virtually everything - holidays, discipline, recruitment the whole lot.
Problem is we have all the policies but are finding it difficult to get one person to apply them. One of us does recruitment, one does updating records, another does payroll, another does this and that and so on. We have Department Managers with average of 4/5 staff each but none of them are skilled or have any knowledge of HR which is just the way we have evolved. We struggle with the basics such as supervisions, timekeeping, discipline, holidays and so on because the Department Heads are not able to do these things and we have the age old problem of them all being really friendly with the staff and being too emotionally attached to do things by the book. We have a General Manager who really doesn't know about HR (as we are now finding out) and tends to devolve this to us as the owners of the company and just adds to the problem rather than sorts it.
My opinion is that we need a HR manager who is completely new to the company who will see things in black and white and set up systems, procedures and policies to get everything back on track and give what I would call a flat line approach (treat everyone the same irrespective of personal attachments or emotion) and manage everyone including the General Manager.
Does what I say make sense? If I get a HR manager what would I expect to pay a decent one, and is it reasonable to expect having not had one before that they would fit into the organisation at a higher level than everyone except us the owners? Does HR usually do payroll, pensions and sick pay and so on?
Lots of questions but really at a crossroads on this one and could do with some direction.