By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
Not enough profit retainedOn the basis that there are sufficient retained profit from previous years, a very simple google searh would have taken you to https://www.gov.uk/running-a-limited-company/taking-money-out-of-a-limited-company
The accountant hasn’t got a clue where it comes fromExplained on the page linked to.
If its not coming from profits, where is it coming from?
The accountant hasn’t got a clue where it comes from
The only things I can remember is I have sold an asset
Unfortunately the accountant has no more in practice and I’m stuck with it not sure how to rectify it
surely it would be an unlawful one, and therefore would be an overdrawn DLA, repayable to the Company?You don’t rectify it.
If you took a dividend and didn’t have sufficient retained earnings, it’s still a dividend.
A dividend can be more than the current year's profit.
But it cannot be more than the profit reserves - this is shown in the balance sheet, just under Share capital. Profit reserves are the previous years' profits less any previous dividends.
surely it would be an unlawful one, and therefore would be an overdrawn DLA, repayable to the Company?
Thanks STD, presumably though it would therefore have to be reversed/reclassed as a DLA?An illegal dividend is still a dividend.
Having insufficient reserves doesn’t make it a loan.
Thanks STD, presumably though it would therefore have to be reversed/reclassed as a DLA?
Thanks STD, presumably though it would therefore have to be reversed/reclassed as a DLA?
Changing it to a loan is something done by the minority, and wrong in my opinion.
It's A Wrap (UK) Ltd. v Gula & Anor Is relevant.
I've never really made my mind up to be fair. I can see both sides of the argument, if you're keeping on top of your clients it should be a rare occurrence really.
I take the same view as STDFR33. I dont see how you can re-write history, that said I've never had a situation where a dividend has been anything more than a few hundred pounds in excess of the maximum payable. I've also never had this challenged by HMRC.
.... Dividends can divide accountants opinions, seen it many times.