By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
If your directors in a company, and at some point your expecting a wage (as well as other benefits) then you are employees and you need employee liabilty insurance.
So if they work for the company and they are paid a wage or salary, for services to the company (IE working) they are an employee, and as such need employee liability insurance, which is what I said.Not necessarily, directors are officers of the companies not employees. Of course they could also be employees as well as officers but they do not need to be.
You are only required by law to have employers liability insurance for people who
you employ under a contract of service or apprenticeship. So if you don't have contracts of employments you don't need employers liability insurance but you may require insurance once you start to receive a salary.
I am not an expert in this area so you should probably seek an expert opinion to be sure.
Trying to cut costs may sound like a good idea, but things like insurance isn't a good idea, lets say one of the "Directors" trips over a computer cable and wants to claim against the business (and they can and do) if you don't have the employees liability insurance your company will be closed before it starts.Thanks for the replies.
We do not especially want to be employees, rather we would prefer to be providing "management" services to the company. We had considered this to "cover" us from the employment perspective and therefore remove the need for employers liability insurance.
(I should add that the reason for all this is to reduce required expenditure in the early weeks/months of the company not to avoid compliance . As soon as we have appropriate income streams the matter will be reviewed)
Thanks for the help so far, appreciated. If there is someone available who can give a definitive answer that would be really appreciated.