By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
Many of the features of contract hire are not especially favourable:
Most contract hire comapnies quote an attractive headline rate but the mielage allowances in those headline rates are normally very limited with a heavy penalty for additional miles.
If you take a with servicing agreement you most probably are paying way over the top for servicing.
You are stuck with that vehicle for the period of the contract hire (to get out can be very expensive). So if your circumstances change for better or for worse you are stuck with it.
At the end of the contract the vehicle is inspected by the rental company's assessors. Your idea of "fair wear and tear" is often vastly at variance with that of the rental company. You could get landed with a very nasty bill for "repairs".
An example I came across was a car which had never been damaged but for some reason during the 3 year contract period part of the paintwork had dulled and there was a clear difference in shading. This was clearly a problem dating back to the opriginal factory paintwork, however, the hire company insisted that this was an area of poor re-spray undertaken sometime during the contract period. The hirere was then presented with a big bill for a re-spray.
One of the arguements for contract hire and leasing was that these were "off balance sheet". My understanding is (accountants correct me if I am wrong) that leasing and otehr agreements to which you are committed should now be shown as long term libilities and are therefore detirmental to the look of your balance sheet.
You will probably incur tax charges for using the vehicle for private use.
One option is to buy a decent car (late used) and charge the company mileage.
The otehr option if you think that your circumstances might change is to go around normal rental companies and get quotes on long term hire which does not commit you to a specific period. Gives youflexibility to upgrade or downsize as circumstances require.
Isn't that 50% of the VAT on the rental?
Many of the features of contract hire are not especially favourable:
Most contract hire comapnies quote an attractive headline rate but the mielage allowances in those headline rates are normally very limited with a heavy penalty for additional miles.
If you take a with servicing agreement you most probably are paying way over the top for servicing.
You are stuck with that vehicle for the period of the contract hire (to get out can be very expensive). So if your circumstances change for better or for worse you are stuck with it.
At the end of the contract the vehicle is inspected by the rental company's assessors. Your idea of "fair wear and tear" is often vastly at variance with that of the rental company. You could get landed with a very nasty bill for "repairs".
An example I came across was a car which had never been damaged but for some reason during the 3 year contract period part of the paintwork had dulled and there was a clear difference in shading. This was clearly a problem dating back to the opriginal factory paintwork, however, the hire company insisted that this was an area of poor re-spray undertaken sometime during the contract period. The hirere was then presented with a big bill for a re-spray.
One of the arguements for contract hire and leasing was that these were "off balance sheet". My understanding is (accountants correct me if I am wrong) that leasing and otehr agreements to which you are committed should now be shown as long term libilities and are therefore detirmental to the look of your balance sheet.
You will probably incur tax charges for using the vehicle for private use.
One option is to buy a decent car (late used) and charge the company mileage.
The otehr option if you think that your circumstances might change is to go around normal rental companies and get quotes on long term hire which does not commit you to a specific period. Gives youflexibility to upgrade or downsize as circumstances require.
I may be able to help with this, feel free to pm me if you want me to look into it for you.Thanks for the replies, our accountant didnt seem to think it was a problem but for us but we have been turned down because we have 2 years instead of 3 years accounts (limited...next set due April). The guy at the car garage seems to want to steer us (no pun intended) down the personal route....just so frustrating!
Thanks for the replies, our accountant didnt seem to think it was a problem but for us but we have been turned down because we have 2 years instead of 3 years accounts (limited...next set due April). The guy at the car garage seems to want to steer us (no pun intended) down the personal route....just so frustrating!
Many of the features of contract hire are not especially favourable:
Most contract hire comapnies quote an attractive headline rate but the mielage allowances in those headline rates are normally very limited with a heavy penalty for additional miles.
If you take a with servicing agreement you most probably are paying way over the top for servicing.
You are stuck with that vehicle for the period of the contract hire (to get out can be very expensive). So if your circumstances change for better or for worse you are stuck with it.
At the end of the contract the vehicle is inspected by the rental company's assessors. Your idea of "fair wear and tear" is often vastly at variance with that of the rental company. You could get landed with a very nasty bill for "repairs".
An example I came across was a car which had never been damaged but for some reason during the 3 year contract period part of the paintwork had dulled and there was a clear difference in shading. This was clearly a problem dating back to the opriginal factory paintwork, however, the hire company insisted that this was an area of poor re-spray undertaken sometime during the contract period. The hirere was then presented with a big bill for a re-spray.
One of the arguements for contract hire and leasing was that these were "off balance sheet". My understanding is (accountants correct me if I am wrong) that leasing and otehr agreements to which you are committed should now be shown as long term libilities and are therefore detirmental to the look of your balance sheet.
You will probably incur tax charges for using the vehicle for private use.
One option is to buy a decent car (late used) and charge the company mileage.
The otehr option if you think that your circumstances might change is to go around normal rental companies and get quotes on long term hire which does not commit you to a specific period. Gives youflexibility to upgrade or downsize as circumstances require.