T
tmb
- Original Poster
- #1
Hello.
I take a lot of payments mailed by cheque, and usually in January I get a few cheques from people that have the wrong year on them (e.g. 05 instead of 06) This year, because a 5 becomes a 6 so easily, rather than ask people to post out another cheque, I've been asking them if they want me just to change the 5 to a 6 instead. In the main, most people are quite happy with that, because it saves them the cost of a stamp, and I'm happy as it means that I can bank their cheque immediately rather than having to wait for an extra few days.
Anyway, one person who agreed to it subsequently cancelled their cheque and is now claiming that I tried to defraud him. His only complaint is that I changed the date from 05 to 06, which I did - with his knowledge and agreement. He claims that I didn't tell him the date was wrong, and because I changed it without his consent he no longer feels obliged to pay for what he received. The obvious flaw in his argument is that I am the one in possession of the now bounced cheque, and he wouldn't know the date had been changed if I hadn't told him prior to changing it.
As far as I'm concerned, I'm the one who is out of pocket to the tune of £40 plus vat for the work he received, however because he had to pay to cancel the cheque, he's moaning to anyone who will listen that he is out of pocket because he had to pay to cancel the cheque.
Quite honestly, I can absorb the loss of £47 without losing any sleep, he's obviously a chancer who never intended to pay and I'll just refuse to do any work for him in the future. My only minor concern is if he has any right to claim back the money his bank charged him from me. I'm not wanting to hassle my lawyer with this because a quick session with him would cost me more than the cheque was worth.
Cheers
Tom
I take a lot of payments mailed by cheque, and usually in January I get a few cheques from people that have the wrong year on them (e.g. 05 instead of 06) This year, because a 5 becomes a 6 so easily, rather than ask people to post out another cheque, I've been asking them if they want me just to change the 5 to a 6 instead. In the main, most people are quite happy with that, because it saves them the cost of a stamp, and I'm happy as it means that I can bank their cheque immediately rather than having to wait for an extra few days.
Anyway, one person who agreed to it subsequently cancelled their cheque and is now claiming that I tried to defraud him. His only complaint is that I changed the date from 05 to 06, which I did - with his knowledge and agreement. He claims that I didn't tell him the date was wrong, and because I changed it without his consent he no longer feels obliged to pay for what he received. The obvious flaw in his argument is that I am the one in possession of the now bounced cheque, and he wouldn't know the date had been changed if I hadn't told him prior to changing it.
As far as I'm concerned, I'm the one who is out of pocket to the tune of £40 plus vat for the work he received, however because he had to pay to cancel the cheque, he's moaning to anyone who will listen that he is out of pocket because he had to pay to cancel the cheque.
Quite honestly, I can absorb the loss of £47 without losing any sleep, he's obviously a chancer who never intended to pay and I'll just refuse to do any work for him in the future. My only minor concern is if he has any right to claim back the money his bank charged him from me. I'm not wanting to hassle my lawyer with this because a quick session with him would cost me more than the cheque was worth.
Cheers
Tom
