- Original Poster
- #1
I thought I might share this with you and see if anyone had any smart ideas.
Last year I won a court case (actually it was settled pre-court for X+costs) and the defendant paid the £Xk up front. Costs were then submitted to the court and with no opposition they were granted, so I had judgement in a further £Yk. Unfortunately the defendant's correspondence was c/o a solicitors firm, (he had already moved solicitors twice since he was not paying their bills), and soon afterwards they say they lost touch with him! I dont think they were party to anything, just that he had used them to hide behind.
The problem is, whilst he keeps moving house, he has a business in town which he is attempting to sell through a business agent so he cannot totally disappear. Trouble is, my solicitor has done everything by the letter of the law which involves sending a court bailiff to do a "judgement of assets", and he merely turns round and says "this is not my business". I actually know the guy who sold him the business so this is a lie, but as far as "correct procedure" goes, I am at an impasse.
In short Y is a suitably large number, and so would happily pay a good few grand to get it sorted out. However it appears the law in this case protects the guilty. Does anyone know a good course of action.
Last year I won a court case (actually it was settled pre-court for X+costs) and the defendant paid the £Xk up front. Costs were then submitted to the court and with no opposition they were granted, so I had judgement in a further £Yk. Unfortunately the defendant's correspondence was c/o a solicitors firm, (he had already moved solicitors twice since he was not paying their bills), and soon afterwards they say they lost touch with him! I dont think they were party to anything, just that he had used them to hide behind.
The problem is, whilst he keeps moving house, he has a business in town which he is attempting to sell through a business agent so he cannot totally disappear. Trouble is, my solicitor has done everything by the letter of the law which involves sending a court bailiff to do a "judgement of assets", and he merely turns round and says "this is not my business". I actually know the guy who sold him the business so this is a lie, but as far as "correct procedure" goes, I am at an impasse.
In short Y is a suitably large number, and so would happily pay a good few grand to get it sorted out. However it appears the law in this case protects the guilty. Does anyone know a good course of action.