- Original Poster
- #1
Someone I know is in a sticky situation and I can see how ill they've become from the stress so would really like to help them, and came across this site. They owned a restaurant which owes a huge VAT bill, a bounce back loan, and money to EON too. Because the accounts weren't submitted on time, Companies House did the compulsory strike off. She saw this and told her accountant, as she has provided all the necessary accounts to him. She then saw that the strike off had been suspended. She assumed this was because her accountant had contacted Companies House and sorted things. It's important to note that English is not her first language which is why she has an accountant in the first place, to take care of the things she has no idea about.
Fast forward some months later and the business is failing. Her business bank account was closed without warning. She states she did ask them why but didn't get a great answer. I suspect it may be because the strike off still saying suspended but can't be sure. She was told the funds that were in the account (around 6k) were put towards the remaining bounce back loan debt. Before the account was closed, she was making the repayments on time.
So she owes the remaining bounce back loan debt, EON, and the VAT. She ceased trading over a year ago but EON are still sending letters saying they'll take her to court for the amount owed. She is terrified of going to Court because 1) her English isn't great and she is concerned this will work against her and 2) because after telling me everything, it's clear she didn't act as a good Director and will 100% be questioned on a lot of the things she did in terms of how it's legally considered wrongful trading. Things such as continuing to trade despite the company making no money. And the BBL funds probably weren't used in the best way.
We dont know why the strike off is suspended and she is too scared to contact Companies House and ask in case this triggers a HMRC investigation. We're not sure who is objecting it, because it was suspended the first time before the bank account was even closed so payments were still being made. Is it fair to assume that it could still be Barclays and that they objected the strike off because despite regular payments being made, there was outstanding debt? She is asking me if she comes to a solution with Barclays and EON, will she then be able to dissolve the company. I've advised against this as I've read that paying one creditor over another can get her in even more trouble.
Where do we go from here? Goes without saying that paying for an Insolvency Practitioner is out of the question. On Companies House the first notice for compulsory strike off was in December 2020 and then the strike off was suspended in January 2021. No further updates after that.
Fast forward some months later and the business is failing. Her business bank account was closed without warning. She states she did ask them why but didn't get a great answer. I suspect it may be because the strike off still saying suspended but can't be sure. She was told the funds that were in the account (around 6k) were put towards the remaining bounce back loan debt. Before the account was closed, she was making the repayments on time.
So she owes the remaining bounce back loan debt, EON, and the VAT. She ceased trading over a year ago but EON are still sending letters saying they'll take her to court for the amount owed. She is terrified of going to Court because 1) her English isn't great and she is concerned this will work against her and 2) because after telling me everything, it's clear she didn't act as a good Director and will 100% be questioned on a lot of the things she did in terms of how it's legally considered wrongful trading. Things such as continuing to trade despite the company making no money. And the BBL funds probably weren't used in the best way.
We dont know why the strike off is suspended and she is too scared to contact Companies House and ask in case this triggers a HMRC investigation. We're not sure who is objecting it, because it was suspended the first time before the bank account was even closed so payments were still being made. Is it fair to assume that it could still be Barclays and that they objected the strike off because despite regular payments being made, there was outstanding debt? She is asking me if she comes to a solution with Barclays and EON, will she then be able to dissolve the company. I've advised against this as I've read that paying one creditor over another can get her in even more trouble.
Where do we go from here? Goes without saying that paying for an Insolvency Practitioner is out of the question. On Companies House the first notice for compulsory strike off was in December 2020 and then the strike off was suspended in January 2021. No further updates after that.
