By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
Essential
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytics
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
vbulletin can be good for big sites, but frankly for smaller/quieter forums I find SMF is better.
I used to run 20+ vbulletins, but now only a handful run vb. It's just not worth the cost and hassle of vb on small sites IMO.
Well, they used to be very grey on links. Now they are being more plain about it.
Not least that almost everyone at UKBF is now in breach of Google's guidelines and should prepare for a penalty! You have been warned!! :o
Over the past two years Google have made it plain they are far more concerned with the strength of the domain, rather than the strength of the content.
That's why the biggest publishers keep republishing content from third parties, and why small publishers have been totally squeezed out of some...
With the caveat that Google and Amazon are aggressively involved in tax avoidance.
The companies enjoy the benefits of trading in stable economies while contributing almost nothing to them.
And every time they expand their services, they put honest hard-working tax-paying individuals out of work.
vbseo has long been used by a lot of vbulletin webmasters for optimising that software - not least to prevent duplicate content and links.
Each software platform has different options, though.
You really don't need to provide a portfolio.
You have to remember that Google is a billion-dollar multi-national whose shareholders believe that the company can actively prevent any undue influence away from Google's own objectivity.
Therefore when anyone - individual or company - starts...
You really want personal recommendations from people whose SEO is working for them, preferably on a mix of strong generics and longtail keywords, rather than longtail only.
Emails and telephone calls are signs of a sales-focused company - as does ranking on Google for SEO keywords* - and often...
It's not about what's allowed, as much as what works.
However, judging by the description of this campaign, it's being done on a very basic level - which means there may be gains in the short-term, but unless they have a more serious strategy in place, long-term success is anything but assured.
Of course, the big kicker is that Google will exclude Google's properties from this change - not least YouTube, which of course never hosts copyright violations. :D
http://www.seobook.com/copyright-spam
All you've done is put a list of Google support answers on links, and added a couple of third party references.
The blog post you link to makes no attempt to explain anything about why these may be on the list, and you clearly aren't sure about how some of them may apply.
So why not try and...
The question to really ask is how qualified is the person leading the training, in terms of industry experience.
It does sound like a weak attempt at upsell of unrelated services.
However, the good news is that my SEO company can now sell you a mobile phone contract and repair your satellite...