By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
Essential
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytics
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
Metro - about 2 hours
Lloyds - 1 day after appointment
Tide - 4 days ( mostly due to their app faults)
Fire - 1 week
The others, cant recall but none have been particularly long *if* they've gone ahead
£450 inc vat is £375 exc VAT
So your profit would be £55, less ...
Inc or ex vat ? This is a fee you pay to send it not charged to the purchaser ?
This is a fee you pay the platform on the _sold_ price presumably, so £67.50
So clearly a loss maker :(
Adding several hundred thousand IPs to a deny list is going to grind your site to a halt, assuming the host doesn't remove the ability to do it for causing issues to the server - if you're looking for that level of control they need to be blocked at the firewall on a dedicated server rather than...
Anything less than 24 hours may have a short-term impact, but no long term damage.
Greater than 24 hours or down for a while then back but on a new IP address, we've seen that negatively impact things for a while with a knock down 2 or 3 pages and then a slow build back up
It (theoretically) prevents the "naughty people" from seeing the data, so limiting access to those gov'ts and hackers with the deliberate backdoors and other exploits - hopefully reducing MITM< attacks
There are other side-effects (which is why google pushes it so much) like you getting...
It depends on who is doing the acquiring, why the host was available to be acquired and wheat the plan for the clientbase is.
For some it's a pure scale/numbers game - the more brands the more likely someone is to "lad" on one of them and if they leave to land on another one (the EIG method for...
They _really_ shouldn't be giving you the ability to block anything on a shared server - the potential for deliberate or accidental breakage is enormous !
If blocking the intensive access drops the load significantly, then yes, it's probably the amount of "visitors" causing the resource spikes. If it happens even with the blocking then the server is overloaded and further investigation is needed - what do top/atop/mtop tell you ?
Caching or...
WF has an "annoying habit" of taking sites offline, which appears to be where the site-owner has automatic updatesleading to the .htaccess becoming unparsable
We've had a few clients go through the 'rebrand' to use their .UK rather than the .CO.UK they used before - I advised them a while ago on reply-to settings for their mail clients so it'd sift over to the new email address formats
For "links" under their control (facebook ad targets, navigation...
They also take into account "distance" from their network (in ASNs) which _could_ be a way of them measuring "cost" to crawl a site, with preference being to those they peer with
Bing appears to take the geo location details from the IP range into account where a domain is a GTLD rather than a...