- Original Poster
- #1
I received a letter today from my landlords agent reminding me that I may only use the premises for the purpose specified in the lease. We are an Art Gallery and Studio.
When I originally approached the agent to take a lease, we were required to submit a comprehensive business plan in order to obtain approval from the landlord. The agent has told us on several occasions that the landlord checks business plans very carefully before assigning a lease, as it is a major criteria for tenant selection.
Our Business Plan is extensive and on the first page in the third paragraph we define our business activity as a Gallery and Studio that provides coffee and cold eats for our customers.
The lease defines our premises as an art gallery and Studio.
Our premises became too small, so we approached the agent and rather than tender for a new property we agreed to have a lease reassigned to us where a tenant needed to get out of their lease because they had ceased to trade.
Our new premises are around the corner from our old ones, by exactly the same distance. The only difference is, is that there is a cafe next door but one to us.
We conduct business in exactly the same way as we did before with an Art Gallery and Artists workshop, selling coffee and prepackaged cakes to our customers.
In the old premises we had several visits from the agents as well as the council and no-one made mention of anything we were doing to suggest we shouldnt be.
My argument is that we do have the landlords consent because the business plan that we submitted makes it clear that selling coffee and cake is part of our gallery business and that we declared it clearly and they did not object.
They knew that we would be doing this activity as part of our business if they read the business plan and as said they needed to read no further than the third paragraph of the first page.
At no point was any objection made to the business plan nor were we told that we could not conduct any of the activities as laid out in the business plan.
When we moved around the corner, the landlord knew that we would be moving for reasons of space, and that there was no change to our business activity.
We reopened on Monday and today is Friday and we received this letter. I can only think that the cafe owner has made some sort of objection to the landlord, (We do not serve meals) because we have a lot of people popping in for a coffee (We are across the road from the courts, so lawyers and clients who have opposing sides sitting in the cafe prefer to stop over at us for a drink)
I am convinced that the cafe owners are seeking to cause trouble (we have the same landlord) for us (They charge a fortune for most things because there are no other food outlets nearby)
Since the coffee and cake was in the business plan which was deemed necessary for the lease approval and the landlord make no intimation that they did not consent any part of the business plan, further that we traded for eight months around the corner with coffee and cold eats on the menu with no problems, is this realistic that they are telling me that I do not have permission to sell coffee and cold eats.
If we had to list every business activity in detail it would take the good part of half a page and I believe the activity is part of the character of the business and not unusual within the context of the business description.
Our Business name - Ballito Bay -coffee with a touch of glass (We make and sell glass art) would also have made it obvious to the landlord, so why are they all of a sudden getting sticky about ancillary business activities.
It has been suggested that their case would not stand up in court as I have copies of the original lease and the original application with the business plan.
Is this likely to get ugly?
I also know that the cafe owner is suffering financially and that their other cafe in another town recently went bankrupt. I have several reasons to believe that they are behind this.
When I originally approached the agent to take a lease, we were required to submit a comprehensive business plan in order to obtain approval from the landlord. The agent has told us on several occasions that the landlord checks business plans very carefully before assigning a lease, as it is a major criteria for tenant selection.
Our Business Plan is extensive and on the first page in the third paragraph we define our business activity as a Gallery and Studio that provides coffee and cold eats for our customers.
The lease defines our premises as an art gallery and Studio.
Our premises became too small, so we approached the agent and rather than tender for a new property we agreed to have a lease reassigned to us where a tenant needed to get out of their lease because they had ceased to trade.
Our new premises are around the corner from our old ones, by exactly the same distance. The only difference is, is that there is a cafe next door but one to us.
We conduct business in exactly the same way as we did before with an Art Gallery and Artists workshop, selling coffee and prepackaged cakes to our customers.
In the old premises we had several visits from the agents as well as the council and no-one made mention of anything we were doing to suggest we shouldnt be.
My argument is that we do have the landlords consent because the business plan that we submitted makes it clear that selling coffee and cake is part of our gallery business and that we declared it clearly and they did not object.
They knew that we would be doing this activity as part of our business if they read the business plan and as said they needed to read no further than the third paragraph of the first page.
At no point was any objection made to the business plan nor were we told that we could not conduct any of the activities as laid out in the business plan.
When we moved around the corner, the landlord knew that we would be moving for reasons of space, and that there was no change to our business activity.
We reopened on Monday and today is Friday and we received this letter. I can only think that the cafe owner has made some sort of objection to the landlord, (We do not serve meals) because we have a lot of people popping in for a coffee (We are across the road from the courts, so lawyers and clients who have opposing sides sitting in the cafe prefer to stop over at us for a drink)
I am convinced that the cafe owners are seeking to cause trouble (we have the same landlord) for us (They charge a fortune for most things because there are no other food outlets nearby)
Since the coffee and cake was in the business plan which was deemed necessary for the lease approval and the landlord make no intimation that they did not consent any part of the business plan, further that we traded for eight months around the corner with coffee and cold eats on the menu with no problems, is this realistic that they are telling me that I do not have permission to sell coffee and cold eats.
If we had to list every business activity in detail it would take the good part of half a page and I believe the activity is part of the character of the business and not unusual within the context of the business description.
Our Business name - Ballito Bay -coffee with a touch of glass (We make and sell glass art) would also have made it obvious to the landlord, so why are they all of a sudden getting sticky about ancillary business activities.
It has been suggested that their case would not stand up in court as I have copies of the original lease and the original application with the business plan.
Is this likely to get ugly?
I also know that the cafe owner is suffering financially and that their other cafe in another town recently went bankrupt. I have several reasons to believe that they are behind this.