Issues with the lease

Ballito Bay

Free Member
Jul 16, 2011
21
9
Glasgow
I received a letter today from my landlords agent reminding me that I may only use the premises for the purpose specified in the lease. We are an Art Gallery and Studio.

When I originally approached the agent to take a lease, we were required to submit a comprehensive business plan in order to obtain approval from the landlord. The agent has told us on several occasions that the landlord checks business plans very carefully before assigning a lease, as it is a major criteria for tenant selection.

Our Business Plan is extensive and on the first page in the third paragraph we define our business activity as a Gallery and Studio that provides coffee and cold eats for our customers.

The lease defines our premises as an art gallery and Studio.

Our premises became too small, so we approached the agent and rather than tender for a new property we agreed to have a lease reassigned to us where a tenant needed to get out of their lease because they had ceased to trade.

Our new premises are around the corner from our old ones, by exactly the same distance. The only difference is, is that there is a cafe next door but one to us.

We conduct business in exactly the same way as we did before with an Art Gallery and Artists workshop, selling coffee and prepackaged cakes to our customers.

In the old premises we had several visits from the agents as well as the council and no-one made mention of anything we were doing to suggest we shouldnt be.

My argument is that we do have the landlords consent because the business plan that we submitted makes it clear that selling coffee and cake is part of our gallery business and that we declared it clearly and they did not object.

They knew that we would be doing this activity as part of our business if they read the business plan and as said they needed to read no further than the third paragraph of the first page.

At no point was any objection made to the business plan nor were we told that we could not conduct any of the activities as laid out in the business plan.

When we moved around the corner, the landlord knew that we would be moving for reasons of space, and that there was no change to our business activity.

We reopened on Monday and today is Friday and we received this letter. I can only think that the cafe owner has made some sort of objection to the landlord, (We do not serve meals) because we have a lot of people popping in for a coffee (We are across the road from the courts, so lawyers and clients who have opposing sides sitting in the cafe prefer to stop over at us for a drink)

I am convinced that the cafe owners are seeking to cause trouble (we have the same landlord) for us (They charge a fortune for most things because there are no other food outlets nearby)

Since the coffee and cake was in the business plan which was deemed necessary for the lease approval and the landlord make no intimation that they did not consent any part of the business plan, further that we traded for eight months around the corner with coffee and cold eats on the menu with no problems, is this realistic that they are telling me that I do not have permission to sell coffee and cold eats.

If we had to list every business activity in detail it would take the good part of half a page and I believe the activity is part of the character of the business and not unusual within the context of the business description.

Our Business name - Ballito Bay -coffee with a touch of glass (We make and sell glass art) would also have made it obvious to the landlord, so why are they all of a sudden getting sticky about ancillary business activities.

It has been suggested that their case would not stand up in court as I have copies of the original lease and the original application with the business plan.

Is this likely to get ugly?

I also know that the cafe owner is suffering financially and that their other cafe in another town recently went bankrupt. I have several reasons to believe that they are behind this.
 

kulture

Free Member
  • Aug 11, 2007
    8,962
    1
    2,754
    68
    www.kultureshock.co.uk
    It really does not matter who is behind this. What matters is what is written in the lease. It may refer to the business plan, or it may simply list your activities, or it may not mention use at all.

    The fact that you have not changed use may be relevant. All that said it would be a good idea to go over this with a commercial solicitor, not least because you have changed premises and not updated the lease.
     
    Upvote 0

    Ballito Bay

    Free Member
    Jul 16, 2011
    21
    9
    Glasgow
    It really does not matter who is behind this. What matters is what is written in the lease. It may refer to the business plan, or it may simply list your activities, or it may not mention use at all.

    The fact that you have not changed use may be relevant. All that said it would be a good idea to go over this with a commercial solicitor, not least because you have changed premises and not updated the lease.

    Hi Kulture

    We signed a new lease which is identical to the old one, just with the address of the new premises on.
     
    Upvote 0

    kulture

    Free Member
  • Aug 11, 2007
    8,962
    1
    2,754
    68
    www.kultureshock.co.uk
    I presume you had the old one terminated, and you have this in writing?

    The devil is always in the detail. You can do whatever your lease says. The landlord can do whatever the lease says. If for instance the lease says that you cannot sell coffee, then you cannot sell coffee. The fact that you sold coffee in the past is immaterial if they now choose to enforce the clause. So it is all down to what the lease says. If you are lucky it will say that you can do business as per your attached business plan. If you are unlucky and it has a list of usages and this list missed out one or more of the business plan activities, then you should have a long chat with your solicitor who agreed the lease and ask why they omitted some of your stated activities. You did use a solicitor didn't you?
     
    • Like
    Reactions: Ballito Bay
    Upvote 0
    J

    jules12345

    I am convinced that the cafe owners are seeking to cause trouble (we have the same landlord) for us (They charge a fortune for most things because there are no other food outlets nearby)

    This maybe the important bit - if the cafe has a clause on their lease suggesting that the landlord must not rent out a property in their possession for the purposes of a cafe and within say 1/2 mile from their cafe, this is what the cafe owners maybe objecting to. (A leasee's side restraint.)

    Have you clarified with the Landlord ... ? The landlord maybe trying to cover a term in the other peoples lease (the cafe) and as such just making sure you are not going above and beyond what you are allowed to do.

    What class is the premises by the way - it is licensed/registered to sell beverages. The Landlord may also have had a letter from the council. It should be on your lease.

    Read this below for the classification and what they mean.

    http://www.p4l.co.uk/guidtocomuse.html

    Hope this helps. If it is an incorrectly classified premises you will be stopped from operating and selling drinks or the business activity that is in breach.

    Kulture says you can do whetever is in the lease and this is correct but you may also be able to do what ISN'T in the lease is some circumstances. In regards to the classification property, if it is classified as say an A3, then you are in your rights to use it as a restaurant, why a LL would stop you is beyond my powers of reasonning.

    In commercial properties - rents are adjudicated in regards to classification for obvious reasons.

    regards
    Jules
     
    Last edited by a moderator:
    Upvote 0
    J

    jules12345

    Did you check to determione whether or not the new property has the same or correct classification for you to sell drinks etc...?

    If it doesn't the question is whether a case of Caveat Emptor would exist - 'buyer beware' and the responsibility on you.

    The question revolves (for court purposes in this scenario) as to whether or not it is reasonable to expect that a LL would inform you of such matters and as such the liability depends on the answer to this question.

    You may well be able to claim losses from the Landlord if you can answer this question in the affirmative. (Ie it is reasonable to expect a LL to infom you of this.)

    Case Law would be the key to this argument.

    My opinion on this is that it is indeed reasonable for a tennant to expect a LL to inform them of the classification of the business premises - certainly in your case and as such if they stop you from selling coffee they are liable - if you dont know the classification I would suggest you probably didnt have legal representation to peruse the lease. (Just my opinion however you would need a sol to verify.)

    In not getting legal advice I would suggest the judge would say at the end of the hearing - and the moral of the story Mr Claimmant is that you should get pro legal help in regards to commercial premises leases.

    Regards
    Jules
     
    Last edited by a moderator:
    Upvote 0

    Ballito Bay

    Free Member
    Jul 16, 2011
    21
    9
    Glasgow
    This maybe the important bit - if the cafe has a clause on their lease suggesting that the landlord must not rent out a property in their possession for the purposes of a cafe and within say 1/2 mile from their cafe, this is what the cafe owners maybe objecting to.

    Have you clarified with the Landlord ... ? The landlord maybe trying to cover a term in the other peoples lease (the cafe) and as such just making sure you are not going above and beyond what you are allowed to do.

    What class is the premises by the way - it is licensed/registered to sell beverages. The Landlord may also have had a letter from the council. It should be on your lease.

    Hope this helps. If it is an incorrectly classified premises you will be stopped from operating and selling drinks or the business activity that is in breach.

    Kulture says you can do whetever is in the lease and this is correct but you may also be able to do what ISN'T in the lease is some circumstances. In regards to the classification property, if it is classified as say an A3, then you are in your rights to use it as a restaurant, why a LL would stop you is beyond my powers of reasonning.

    In commercial properties - rents are adjudicated in regards to classification for obvious reasons.

    regards
    Jules

    Thanks Jules

    I'll take a careful read of the lease. There is no problem with planning or environmental health. They have been helpful and supportive.

    We dont serve meals and dont need a Class 3 (Which is a restaurant in Scotland) We are allowed to sell coffee and prepackaged food in a Class 1 premises as a ancilliary activity and planning have confirmed this. We confirmed with planning when we were in the previous premises too. We found that approaching the local authority rather than waiting for them to approach us made all the difference.

    This is not a classification issue, but rather something that has made the landlord perk up and pay attention. Rather ironic because our landlord is technically the local authority (An arms length company set up by the local authority) who in all other respects have been very helpful.

    The regeneration plan indicates that the area is actually allocated more "eateries" as it is being redeveloped, so I'm unsure that our proximity is necessarily relevant, but I would not dismiss your suggestion and wold certainly investigate it further.

    I have noted however that we passed environmental health inspection with flying colours, Our cafe neighbour does not have an inspection on record.
     
    Upvote 0
    J

    jules12345

    This is not a classification issue, but rather something that has made the landlord perk up and pay attention. Rather ironic because our landlord is technically the local authority (An arms length company set up by the local authority) who in all other respects have been very helpful.

    This is getting interesting as they may be bound by public law and fettering discretion etc, (the decision maker director may know the cafe owner.).

    If the building is correctly classified then I cant see how on earth that they can stop you especially knowing that they are a quango and as such a pseudo public authority. You may wish to seek the help of a public lawyer on this one and maybe even a judicial review.

    Regards
    Jules
     
    Upvote 0
    Thanks for the humour, it makes such a difference, especially since all we're doing is trying to make a living!:)

    Its a reference to a famous case in contract/tort law called donoghue v stevenson and was in regards to a cafe owner in Scotland selling a bottle of lemonade which contained within it a snail. It questions liability and is probably the most famous case (certainly snail) in legal history.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donoghue_v_Stevenson

    Regards
    Jules
     
    Last edited by a moderator:
    Upvote 0

    Ballito Bay

    Free Member
    Jul 16, 2011
    21
    9
    Glasgow
    The saga continues.

    After we responded to the landlords letter insisting that we are doing nothing different to before, we have had to involve the police because our neighbour at the Bistro was distressing some of our customers with homophobic behaviour (we are a lesbian couple) and similar acts of hate. (I would rather not give details on a public forum) The liasion officer has said that based on his behaviour he is already risking a charge of incitement to hate crime.

    I have a serious disability and have an assistance dog (registered with an EHRC card). The only people who see this dog are only those who see us coming in the morning and going home in the evening, The dog remains in the workshop with me and leaves only for us to take her for toilet relief (she goes to the toilet on command as she is trained this way)

    Environmental health received a complaint that we are keeping a dog in the food preparation area. The dog has never been anywhere near the food prep area and always remains downstairs with me in the studio, away from the customers and away from any food/hygiene areas as well as our customers. The officer took one look at the situation and told me she believed this was a malicious complaint. I read the mobile phone number off the complaint sheet that she had in her diary, (Upside down and no real effort to hide it) called it the moment she left the shop and no guessing as to who answered the phone!

    Ten days ago, we received a reply (two months after our reply to their first letter) from the landlords agent, stating that they knew we sold coffee and small eats to our customers previously, but have now decided that we may not do so on our new premises. There is NOTHING in the lease that says that we cannot sell any sort of food. It is a very generic run of the mill lease document and it clearly involved them filling in the spaces to print off the document. I replied telling them that they were aware of our business activities and if there was a problem with us continuing with any aspect of our business practice at the new premises they had an obligation to inform us of this prior to assigning the new lease. I also stated that if they intended to take action to prevent us from conducting our business as normal, we would consider pursuing compensation.

    Furthermore our problem is definitely not with the local authority. We went to the safety services officer at the council on the recommendation of the senior liasion officer at the police, because the police believed that the owner of the bistro has been using complaint mechanisms within the local authority and the landlord to harass us even further.

    The safety services officer asked me what I wanted to happen and I said that I wanted the representative from the arms length body landlord who deals with anti social behaviour of commercial tenants and social problems within commercial leases to meet with us and help mediate a way through this. We don't believe the agent is relaying the whole picture. We don't want war, we want to play fair using all the mechanisms available to us before having to take this to court. Safety services have established that neither planning nor environmental health have a problem with our business.

    We received a letter today from the landlord's agent stating that they would seek to enforce the lease if we do not stop selling food and drink immediately. We feel that if we do, it will be acknowledging their position and place our case at risk. They also claim they will come and inspect us without appointment. This could seriously disrupt us especially since we are running exhibition events this month.

    We have been advised that our landlord will have to take us to court to enforce anything and we will then have an opportunity to present our case. We have informed the landlord about the problems with the other tenant and that there is a police investigation, but they are blanking it. We are trying desperately to mediate but the landlords agent is intent on sending us these nasty letters.

    It has also been suggested that we consider including coffee and cake in our lecture/class fees as a work around and offer it as a free extra as well as offer free coffee to people who buy a pair of stud earrings. It is cost effective for us to sell a pair of plain glass studs at £1.80 and offer a free latte. Free bacon roll with lecture class registration etc...

    We have extensive legal insurance and will use this if need be. We will be instructing this week. Is there anything that we should think of or maybe have not considered in all of this? After all lawyers are only human and can only consider the information they are given. We don't want to miss something that could be critical. We have located alternative premises, however we have contractual obligations (with clients) that mean we cannot move before Christmas. Its ten weeks to Christmas and legal wheels in our experience turn slowly, I've reached the point that as long as we can keep going til Christmas then we'll leave.

    The closure of our business will impact directly on three local charities. It will impact on the local business participation in a police safety initiative and the local authority will lose a social enterprise service that essentially they get free and would cost them twice the value of our annual lease elsewhere. It will also result in several job losses and loss of outlet for five local artists - that's a direct impact on jobs for seven people and twenty five seasonal workers. In the context of the current economic climate I find it hard to believe that the local autority would voluntarily let this happen. I have no qualms about issuing a press release should it go this way.

    In closing, coffee and cake is ancilliary - not our primary business but very much part of the character of our business and the other arts based organisations in the area operate on a very similar model. It is a notable characteristic of the crafts and arts business in our part of the city. We sell about £6 worth of coffee every day on average. (Which cafe could survive doing that?)

    When we sell more than £6 its usually to our morning or evening customers when the Bistro is shut - he closes at 4:00 in the afternoon and opens after 8:00 in the morning, we're open from 7:00am to 10pm. We keep records of food and glass/art sales separate for record keeping and planning purposes, so we can prove this. I believe that the local cafe is blaming us for the impact that the economic downturn is having on him, which has nothing to do with us. We have also just discovered that he is trying to sell his business and has had it on the market at least from the time we moved around the corner. Until recently we were sending him him customers on an almost daily occurrence. We put a stop to this last week.

    Any advice on what we should remember to cover when we meet with counsel or even comments or jokes about how ridiculous this whole thing is?
     
    Upvote 0

    kulture

    Free Member
  • Aug 11, 2007
    8,962
    1
    2,754
    68
    www.kultureshock.co.uk
    It seems you are covering all the basics. You did say at one point "There is NOTHING in the lease that says that we cannot sell any sort of food." if so then on what basis are they going to "enforce the lease"?

    I would suggest that you write to the agent and having asked the above question, I would ask that they stop harassing you.

    I would also start writing to the paper. Publicity can only help you in this case.
     
    Upvote 0

    Latest Articles