How To Choose an Accountant - the Inside Track

Wild Goose

Free Member
Aug 16, 2008
1,337
412
Great Metropolis
1 Qualified Accountant
“Accountant” is not a regulated word. That means anyone can call themselves an accountant, regardless of their qualifications, or lack of them. Choose a member of a recognised accountancy body (with a practising certificate) to help ensure the person you are hiring has the relevant quals, experience, and has not just been released from Ford Open Prison. Plus you’ll have a professional body to complain to if things go awry.

2 Qualified Bookkeeper
Anyone can call themselves a bookkeeper too. So the same goes for ensuring a bookkeeper is suitably qualified, experienced, and of reasonably good character. Be careful a bookkeeper isn’t out of his depth if also preparing your accounts and advising on your taxes. After all, you wouldn’t have a dental technician pull your tooth out.

3 Value Pricing
You wouldn’t have a builder start work on your extension without first obtaining a quote or, at the very least, an estimate. So don’t make that mistake with an accountant. Some of those who do not publish their fee rates employ value pricing techniques: that is, the more important or urgent a piece of work is to you, the higher the fee they’ll quote for a particular job. So try to choose an accountant with a published price menu – after all, you wouldn’t eat in a restaurant that concealed its prices.

4 Money Laundering
Be careful what you say to your accountant: he has a legal duty to secretly report you to the authorities if he has reason to suspect that you have been guilty of tax evasion, no matter how minor. If he doesn’t report you, he faces possible criminal charges, financial ruin, and up to two years in prison. Furthermore, if he tips you off by discussing the matter or admitting to having reported you even when directly challenged, he would face similar criminal charges of “tipping off”. The same Money Laundering obligations also apply to your bank manager, financial advisor, and (to a lesser extent) your solicitor.

5 The Right Sized Firm
Many businesspeople choose large and prestigious accountants in the belief that the high fees will at least ensure a top-notch service, only to be disappointed when their affairs are assigned to a trainee or junior member of staff. Many large practices are too busy concentrating on their larger and more important customers to be able to offer a first class service to their smaller customers. If that sounds rather like the way your bank treat you, then think twice before going to a practice that’s too big for your business.

6 The Cheap Price No-Advice Job
We all know to reject the most expensive or overpriced quote, but anyone in purchasing will also tell you to reject the lowest quote too. Anyone under-pricing could be desperate for work – ask yourself why they can’t get work at the market rate. A low quote sometimes results in a corner-cutting no-frills job with nothing in the budget for tax advice. Cheap price and no-advice can lead to an expensive tax bill.

7 The Loss-Leader
Some accountants quote a low-ball first year fee to gain clients, rather like insurance companies do, and then hike up their fees in the second year. Beware of those offering a loss-leader fee but charging astronomical rates for “unanticipated” work such as a business plan or a tax enquiry. Look carefully at the whole package you are negotiating: what exactly is included, and just what rate will you pay if you want your accountant to do something else, such as attend a VAT visit or a meeting with your bank manager?

8 Free Advice
Many accountants offer a free initial consultation; but what about those who offer you free “unlimited access” via phone calls and/or meetings all year round? That is totally uncommercial and unrealistic. Ask yourself how you would feel about customers of yours availing themselves of such an offer; would you be inclined to deliver a top-notch service if you were obligated to spend say two days of your week giving a free service to your customers? Or might you be tempted to skimp on the work? If an accountant doesn’t know enough to charge something for their services then they really don’t know enough to be a help to your business.

9 Approachability
A recent survey by Sage announced that the top pet-hate people have for their accountants is that they’re never available, and sometimes take days to return calls. You’ll have to make your own value call as to whether the accountants you shop around sound pleased to hear from you, or is it all a bit of a chore for them? Do they talk about you and your business, or about themselves and their business? Do they take a genuine interest in what you have to say about your business, or are they too wrapped up in their own affairs? If they’re too busy to see you as a prospect, they’ll be too busy to deal with you as a client.

10 The X-Factor
Q. How do you spot an accountant with a personality?
A. He looks at your shoes rather than his own when shaking hands.
Alright, we’re not all as bad as that. But let’s face it, the stereotypical accountant is an introverted geek with poor social skills. To find one that can bring something to the party, rely on your gut instinct when making your choice; the very same instinct you use daily to make business decisions. Regardless of how clever they might be, an accountant is generally only as good as his communication skills allow him to be. So focus on that aspect: can you actually understand what your accountant is saying, and how well does he listen and respond to what you say?
 

Jaydee

Free Member
May 27, 2007
1,080
283
All good ... except point 4 - which seems a little scaremongering?

An exemption from reporting to SOCA is set out by statute law. It is an exemption of limited application (for example, it applies only to 'suspicious activity reports' to SOCA - in other words the reports made under Money Laundering Regulations 2007, s330 Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 and the parallel legislation relating to terrorist financing). The statute law sets out quite clearly that it applies to information received in 'privileged circumstances' (as defined in the statute) by lawyers and 'relevant professional advisers' (as defined - to include most qualified accountants).

The statutory exemption says that where information is received by a lawyer or 'relevant professional adviser' in 'privileged circumstances' there is no obligation to report it to SOCA.
 
Upvote 0

David Griffiths

Free Member
  • Jun 21, 2008
    11,553
    3,669
    Cwmbran
    All good ... except point 4 - which seems a little scaremongering?

    An exemption from reporting to SOCA is set out by statute law. It is an exemption of limited application (for example, it applies only to 'suspicious activity reports' to SOCA - in other words the reports made under Money Laundering Regulations 2007, s330 Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 and the parallel legislation relating to terrorist financing). The statute law sets out quite clearly that it applies to information received in 'privileged circumstances' (as defined in the statute) by lawyers and 'relevant professional advisers' (as defined - to include most qualified accountants).

    The statutory exemption says that where information is received by a lawyer or 'relevant professional adviser' in 'privileged circumstances' there is no obligation to report it to SOCA.

    Haven't the professional accountanyc bodies just failed in an attempt to have accountants classified as relevant professional advisers so that they have the same status as solcitors in relation to professional privilege?

    There was certainly a case on this a couple of months back.
     
    Upvote 0

    Jaydee

    Free Member
    May 27, 2007
    1,080
    283
    Haven't the professional accountanyc bodies just failed in an attempt to have accountants classified as relevant professional advisers so that they have the same status as solcitors in relation to professional privilege?

    There was certainly a case on this a couple of months back.

    No, my understanding was that the Prudential case failed (and this has spooked everyone) but that the stautory exemption remains:

    http://www.accountingweb.co.uk/topic/tax/where-do-we-stand-legal-privilege/456991
     
    Upvote 0

    Wild Goose

    Free Member
    Aug 16, 2008
    1,337
    412
    Great Metropolis
    Haven't the professional accountanyc bodies just failed in an attempt to have accountants classified as relevant professional advisers so that they have the same status as solcitors in relation to professional privilege?

    There was certainly a case on this a couple of months back.

    I read something in conjunction with that case sounding the warning that a prospect having an informal chat (a free initial consultation, if you prefer) is regarded as a client for money laundering purposes.:|

    People often chat in the pub about their tax affairs - I'm sure you guys get it too - and it raises the question of whether such alcohol-fuelled divulgances constitute an informal chat. Does an informal chat have to be on the premises, or on any old premises?:|

    David, why aren't you watching the Scarlets play Leicester? :|
     
    Upvote 0

    Peasie

    Free Member
    Jul 12, 2010
    46
    7
    2 Qualified Bookkeeper
    Anyone can call themselves a bookkeeper too. So the same goes for ensuring a bookkeeper is suitably qualified, experienced, and of reasonably good character. Be careful a bookkeeper isn’t out of his depth if also preparing your accounts and advising on your taxes. After all, you wouldn’t have a dental technician pull your tooth out.
    Get a bookkeeper to do it instead.
     
    Upvote 0

    Wild Goose

    Free Member
    Aug 16, 2008
    1,337
    412
    Great Metropolis
    No doubt, you mean it toungue in cheek but for the record I am sure that most clients would be relaxed about accountants complying with their Money Laundering reporting obligations

    About as relaxed as you or I would be if a busybody teacher took it upon themself to report us to social services for some minor transgression. "Minor" being the key word: as you are aware there is no de minimis limit on money laundering reporting. The fact that the requirements can extend to prospects having a free initial consultation serves only to strengthen my belief that people should be aware of the form.

    And I'm uncomfortable with the advice, which appears to be universal amongst the institutions, that if we're asked directly by our clients whether we've reported them for money laundering, you and I must lie and say "no" or otherwise face the criminal charge of "tipping off".
     
    Last edited:
    Upvote 0

    Latest Articles

    Join UK Business Forums for free business advice