By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
Not a bad idea, probably need a broadcasting license then........
I just know other shop keepers who dont agree with paying such things....
theres always one.....
Re - Matt1959 01 Nov 21:34, the end listener doesn't get charged for listening to the radio, the broadcaster gets charged. .
Whilst I agree with your 'it's their livelihood' sentiment Stephen, no money from the PRS license actually goes to the artist.( a % will go to the songwriter ).Pay music artists for their talent, or don't use their services (i.e. don't play music). Do you charge for the services or products from your shop or do you give them for free? If you charge, so should musicians - it's their livelihood.
Back office listening WAS fine, but not any more.Back office listening is fine
Back office listening WAS fine, but not any more.
The PRS have re-defined the meaning of 'public-broadcast'.
One guy was obviously claiming that he only played religious music to try and avoid paying the fee
IMO this is nonsense. You buy the cd and the artist gets paid. You play it in the shop for a bit of ambience but customers aren't coming to the shop to hear the music so why should you have to pay twice? It's nuts.
IMO this is nonsense. You buy the cd and the artist gets paid. You play it in the shop for a bit of ambience but customers aren't coming to the shop to hear the music so why should you have to pay twice? It's nuts.
As I said earlier, NO money collected by the PRS goes to musiciansArguing with the rights and wrongs of PRS is just plain silly, its a very established form of payment for musicians
A/ No money goes to musicians.the pricing of CDs and radio broadcasts is in part down to the understanding that musicians will make money from their product through other avenues such as PRS.
Pay music artists for their talent, or don't use their services (i.e. don't play music). Do you charge for the services or products from your shop or do you give them for free? If you charge, so should musicians - it's their livelihood.
Hold on, you're not quite making a fair comparison here.
The station broadcasting the music has paid for the right to do so.
So, to make a fair comparison, it would be more like you buying an item, paying the shop for the item, but also having to pay the manufacturer again for the item.
The radio aspect is rather funny
PRS make you pay a fee to listen to a radio station in your shop, the radio station has also paid a (very high!) fee to PRS to broadcast the music. Then you have to listen to radio adverts....
As with most middlemen, PRS/agencies/labels are the one making the money, not the artist at the end of the chain.