By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
Essential
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytics
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
No problem.
So in writing it says 16 hours a month, verbally it was 16 hours a week. I guess there is an argument to turn around say 'this doc (for nursery) says you are offering me 16 hours a week' which they can hopefully come to some arrangement over.
So the holiday that is being offered...
This is in the food/retail sector - it is a desert shop where customers would eat in/take away/ order deliveries.
So from your comment above, I am gathering that the hours given as per contract can be changed against what was agreed with the franchisor, and the franchisee is also able to give...
This question comes as a member of staff where a friend has recently been offered a job by a company franchisee. The interview and training took place with the franchiser before the franchisee had opened their store. A 16 hour a week contract was agreed verbally. A couple of months down the...
I do not have a union rep - I never signed up (which I obviously regret now), and have not asked the respondent either (which as you can understand as we have this dispute, I do not currently wish to).
The schedule of loss had a particular format which was very easy to find online - but this...
Apologies. It is an employment tribunal to be presented in front of a judge. Many thanks for what you have sent, but this is the next stage to be made by the respondent/company. All I need at the moment is to submit a list of documents (the actual documents to be sent only if requested).
I was...
The list of documents is a requirement from the court. The claimant and respondent to send a list of documents to each other on the given date, and also sending the documents if requested to do so.
The respondent would then (required by the court) prepare a file of the documents for the hearing.
I am an ex employee who has made a claim for unfair dismissal against an ex employer. I have been asked to submit a list to the company that I wish to refer to at the hearing or which are relevant to the case. Is there a particular format this list should be in? I have spent some time looking...
Thanks for the advice all.
The company is a huge company, and within my 2.5 years there, had 3 managers and I only really had a conversation with my first one. For issues you have so many departments to go to, and where I have tried to get my salary ocrrected 3 times (twice whilst working there...
Well, the company owes me money too.
I don't want to give away too much information, but like I have said above, I've only mention what they've actually investigated. She was provocative first, and without knowing the full story, I'd appreciate if names or labels weren't thrown.
I do not believe...
None, I did not hit on her. If I ask a male to meet up it's fine, but I ask a female and I'm hitting on her? That's the problem. And just because the customer made the wrong assumption, the investigators without investigating fully have made a decision. I believe there's many aspects they have...
Well, depends on the line of work.... And the interaction that was had during the transaction. But like I said, the customer was provocative, the details of which I will not go through here, and offered her number. So technically it was her who 'lead me on'. I've customers in the past, going out...
Contacted her related to the job, but not something within my role, it was me trying to go out my way for someone in that situation. Offered to meet up, which wasn't intended to be anything 'provocative' but she thought it was and said she's married.
The dismissal was around breaching gdpr...
I did deal with the customer professionally, but contacted later. And the contact was not anything provocative. Well, it wasn't intended in that way.
However it seems as if the investigation was done with view that everything I did was with an ill intention, and whatever the customer did is...
Apologies, so the customer in question was being provocative and offered her number which I refused (and being polite, said it can be obtained from the system), which the customer showed no objection. The details were taken and the customer was contacted. The investigation was for an alleged...