By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
Essential
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytics
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
thanks scalloway, i thought that would be the case re. the voting rights. I'm still not sure on the dividend point however - surely even if both shares have same rights they would be of different classes by virtue of having different nominal values (and thus not uniform in all respects) therfore...
I have come across a company with one shareholder having 1 ordinary share of 1pound and another with 10 shares of 10pence each. Am I right in saying that even though the shares are of the same nominal value, the shareholder with 10 shares of 10p each owns 90.9% of the company?
Am I also right...
A corporate is a shareholder in a company (lets call the shareholder company x). When a decision has to be made by the company (in which co x is a shareholder), would it be the directors or shareholder (ordinary or special res) who makes the decision on behalf of the co?
Hi all,
just wondering how taxation on dividends works with corporate shareholders.
Say A and B (people) are shareholders in X limited. X limited is the sole shareholder in Y limited.
If Y limited declares dividends and X limited therefore pays (corporation) tax, would A and B (as...
am i correct in saying then that in a sh agreement you could require a change of the articles to require unanimity as a special res as it is 'not less than 75%' under s283?
i think you're right re. removal of director as CA states it must be done by ordinary resolution which is defined as a...
that's interesting re. your last sentence, i would have presumed it would have required 75% of all shareholders. Yes i understand that re. the second paragraph, it was a example more than anything.
Of course shareholders can require a greater majority than 75% if stated in the articles or sh...
ETEB, thanks for this, so the different alphabet shares denote different dividend entitlement (as i thought was the case - however i thought it would have to be mentioned in the prescribed particulars - i.e. class a shares would be entitled to the first 75% of the dividends from profits, class b...
What is the purpose of having different classes of shares if they appear to have the same rights attributed to each?
There are ordinary a shares, b shares, c shares and d shares, however they all have the same prescribed particulars 'full divi, voting and distribution rights, non redeemable...
your description of the set-up is quite confusing. From what i can gather a JV company has been set up with 4 25% shareholders (all of which are also directors)?
JV's are notoriously risky so using a ltd co vehicle is sensible. I am not sure that you need to have your own separate co to hold...
employee and director are two distinct (but often conflated) roles. you would still need to follow proper procedure even if dismissing for gross misconduct and of course passing the correct resolutions
Even though he not be formally employed through a contract, be careful that he is not employed through custom and practice. I.e would he be able to assert there was an employment arrangement - was he paid the same each month, obligated to work, following instructions etc.
re eteb above, i do...