By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
Essential
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytics
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
It's a sensible idea and thanks. Alas, we've seen from reject images provided by RM that there is never an issue with creased, folded, torn or damaged labels, it's always a simple matter of computer says no "unreadable".
Imagine if we all had to start stuffing our envelopes with packing waste...
@andybrussell Thanks for sharing your account - and it's a familiar account.
My view is IPROL surcharges are a general issue affecting at least a number of mail centres, and senior management have directed local staff to not budge an inch when investigating complaints. We all get the same...
Just a quick update on our last two weeks:
Our new and fresh equipment made no difference to the IPROL reject rate (5%) and charges now amount to £224. Based on evidence gathered we will have one last try complaining to the postal review panel, then onward to legal action.
IPROL is a £1 surcharge levied by RM every time they reject a mail item barcode as being unreadable. It's supposed to cover their cost of overlaying the original label with a replacement.
Our frustrations about this practice are manifold, but amplified by the complete lack of transparency...
jjscruff - yes we too get a small number of surcharges related to those weight discrepancies. Before even checking we know they must be wrong because the restated weight will be for example 1.4Kg for a small letter item containing a piece of card... So we let them batch up and make a complaint...
Thanks for your response Simplyjoshimo - that's a good idea and it will be worth our time to gather that evidence for future dispute. I did see that the Royal Mail app had limited capability to scan barcodes - is there other software that could make a quicker job of it? At the current rate...
Hey there,
We have accrued about £200 of IPROL charges since they started in March, which apply to less than 5% of our mail items.
We received some standard zero-effort guff in response to our first complaint. The matter was then escalated and we were provided with a few sample images of...