By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
Having said all that, and having read the whole thread, I can see that you are not teeth-grindingly irritating all the way through - you seem to become more personable over time. o.
1. It would have been interesting if you had answered more of the maths questions to see what her excuse would have been then. I say that because I still don't think you would have been invited back for an interview.
2. Having said all that, and having read the whole thread, I can see that you are not teeth-grindingly irritating all the way through - you seem to become more personable over time. This is why first impressions shouldn't count, even though in reality they do.
2. Thanks, I'm only irritating when I'm being irritated. As you can see if people stop with the hostility towards me there is none back.
Interviews these days seem to be so complex..
My son is a qualified commercial pilot currently unable to get a job in his chosen field, so recently applied for a job a a train driver. Of 4000 applicants, he was one of only 150 selected for first assessment. he got through to 2nd assessment, approx 50 left by that point. He thought he had done well, and to be honest was quite confident knowing his existing qualifications, but no, his application is not being progressed any further.
Whether he will get any feedback we do not yet know, but at this point he has no idea at all why he failed, when on paper he thought he was a strong candidate.
And a friend of mine is involved in recruitment for a national company and she interviewed someone who was perfect for a job, but when the lady sat the computer based customer service she failed it. So although everything about her was positive, because she didn't tick the right boxes they could not offer her a job.
It was a lot easier in the old days...........
Interviews these days seem to be so complex..
My son is a qualified commercial pilot currently unable to get a job in his chosen field, so recently applied for a job a a train driver. Of 4000 applicants, he was one of only 150 selected for first assessment. he got through to 2nd assessment, approx 50 left by that point. He thought he had done well, and to be honest was quite confident knowing his existing qualifications, but no, his application is not being progressed any further.
Whether he will get any feedback we do not yet know, but at this point he has no idea at all why he failed, when on paper he thought he was a strong candidate.
And a friend of mine is involved in recruitment for a national company and she interviewed someone who was perfect for a job, but when the lady sat the computer based customer service she failed it. So although everything about her was positive, because she didn't tick the right boxes they could not offer her a job.
It was a lot easier in the old days...........
Sad state of the times. Securing a train drivers job is akin to winning the lottery these days, people are enticed by the 35k-70k earnings potential and 4 day weeks (most companies). Competition is insane. I'm guessing the same can be said for airline pilots, young people taking their qualifications and finding that there just isn't the jobs there for them.
Interviews these days seem to be way over the top.
1) Online application and personality questionaire
2) Psycometric testing
3) Telephone interview (sometimes several)
4) Interview at offices (sometimes several)
5) Assessment centre
Even some retailers are adopting these sorts of processes for shop floor work. What is most disheartening for candidates is you can pass through many stages of this "hoop jumping" exercise and find that the company can't even be arsed to reject your application.
I practically walked out an interview once when being interviewed by a clueless HR manager for a technical position in a laboratory (simply processing samples) who proceeded to ask more and more ridiculous questions. "Give me 10 uses for this glass other than to drink out of...if you could be a tree, which type would you be"... I honestly think some of them sadistically enjoy baiting candidates with bulls**t knowing how desperate a lot are for jobs. I personally let them know that I'll answer any questions regarding my abilities, my general demeanour, my C.V, my experiences but I won't answer what I deem to be a pisstake. Funnily enough, most SME's don't engage in this crap but large employers feel the need to ask you to drink a litre of orange juice while standing on your head. If you won't do it, someone else will.
1. Got there and discovered it was a female manager.
I've had some bad job interviews in my life.
Lancashire Double Glazing
This was for the position of office administrator and was the worst job interview I have ever had. For some reason they seemed to advertise the same job every 2-3 months but I made the mistake of applying anyway -
1. Got there and discovered it was a female manager.
2. She did a poor interview lasting only 30 seconds.
3. When it got to my part I decided to check why they kept advertisng for the same position so I asked why did the last person leave?
4. At that point she became unprofessional and abusive towards me during the interview. She went on about the last member of staff falling out with them and threatening to kill them. I'm sat there taking in how shes being towards me, listening to the story and theres no doubt in my mind that shes demented. I even thought to myself 'Never mind the guy I've only been here two minutes and even I'm getting the urge to lean over this table and crack you one'. I dont remember her name but that woman was a nut job.
Sainsburys
I applied for the position of assistant manager. Their online testing hasnt been written by someone with a management degree. If you give management degree answers you'll fail the test.
TK Maxx
I got sexually propositioned by the store manager in return for a management job (its was a bloke too!). I didnt.
Interviews these days seem to be so complex..
My son is a qualified commercial pilot currently unable to get a job in his chosen field, so recently applied for a job a a train driver. Of 4000 applicants, he was one of only 150 selected for first assessment. he got through to 2nd assessment, approx 50 left by that point. He thought he had done well, and to be honest was quite confident knowing his existing qualifications, but no, his application is not being progressed any further.
I've had some bad job interviews in my life.
Lancashire Double Glazing
This was for the position of office administrator and was the worst job interview I have ever had. For some reason they seemed to advertise the same job every 2-3 months but I made the mistake of applying anyway -
1. Got there and discovered it was a female manager.
2. She did a poor interview lasting only 30 seconds.
3. When it got to my part I decided to check why they kept advertisng for the same position so I asked why did the last person leave?
4. At that point she became unprofessional and abusive towards me during the interview. She went on about the last member of staff falling out with them and threatening to kill them. I'm sat there taking in how shes being towards me, listening to the story and theres no doubt in my mind that shes demented. I even thought to myself 'Never mind the guy I've only been here two minutes and even I'm getting the urge to lean over this table and crack you one'. I dont remember her name but that woman was a nut job.
Sainsburys
I applied for the position of assistant manager. Their online testing hasnt been written by someone with a management degree. If you give management degree answers you'll fail the test.
TK Maxx
I got sexually propositioned by the store manager in return for a management job (its was a bloke too!). I didnt.
The online test was done by some monkey not even in HR. Why would they be to management degree standard to doa website?
Now every qualified manager knows that motivation is done by applying Maslows Hierarchy of Needs, psychological contracts plus looking after their training and development. HR know that (its what they train to do) so I selected that answer.
That's what everyone with a degree, a big attitude and little experience knows.
An intelligent / experienced manager knows how to get results.
My last post on this thread - how about you approach job interviews with the attitude of showing how you can fulfill their needs - as expressed by them , rather than telling them how much you know?
You bored or something?
It's a good point though in a way. I know all about the hierarchy of needs an other motivational theories and models but unfortunately I also reckon its total rubbish the comment suggesting that any manager of worth having would know all about it. I know you're frustrated but it's comments like that which have gotten backs up.
I think it just probably wasn't a good match, count it as a dodged bullet if you will, I would if I was feeling like that after an interview. Something else will come up and by the sounds of it I would look at a combination of grad schemes and normal jobs. Grad schemes will care about your Maslows, pretty much the rest of the world couldn't give a damn!
And although the question wasn't to me, I am bored on the train yes haha!
Hi people some advice please -
1. You see an account manager job being advertised and decide to apply for it.
1. Also, there's many a great manager who leads by example and by use of common sense, not via whatever pop psychology you might believe holds the key to managing employees. Experience beats education in practical situations 99.9% of the time.
2. Just because someone is a nutter or appears to have no clue, does not mean they don't know how to make money. Have a look at Howard Hughes, Bidzina Ivanishvili, Foster Friess, Peter Lewis.... Many people consider each and every one of these to be absolute eccentric freaks, but they all have more than $1bil to show for it...
3. Blood Lust, me thinks you need to quickly make it to age 26![]()
Its not surprising that he didn't get this job. He's way over qualified for it and its painfully obvious to the interviewer that he's going to leave as soon as he gets offered a pilots job. So why would they want to spend money training him, to then have to train his replacement and pay the recruitment costs twice also?
He'd have been better off lying and saying he didn't finish the pilots training...
I find I can easily spot badly run firms a mile off. Many times even by the contents of their job advert.
1. I dont understand how leading by example leaves people motivated? My experience says staff are only motivated by this because they know the manager is watching. As soon as you disappear they return to normal. The reason is nothing has happened to increase their buy-in to your business or to fix the problems demotivating them.
2. By nutter I mean psychotic not eccentric.
3. Thankyou I'm in my 30s and I've been out in the workforce for the last 12 years.
All staff start at a company highly motivated, keen to do well and keen to impress. As soon as their psychological contracts start getting violated they turn into normal staff (usually its a manager or colleague violating their rights). As more violation happens they become more and more demotivated. One quarter last 10 years but most are gone before 5 because they end up hating the place.
Leading from the front, staff meetings and private chats where you tell someone to up their act doesnt identify why they're demoivated or resolve the problem. The way staff are motivated is by building a work environment that is missing the things that violate psychological contracts - i.e. company wide no a-hole rule, dont underpay them, dont overstress them, no favourtism, etc.
Then you apply Maslows Hierarchy of needs on top of it - Get them socialising with each other, build their self-esteem, etc. Finally you increase their buy-in by developing and training them.
Leading by example is the phrase in a job advert that says the management dont know how motivation works.
1. So now I said something in my interview?
2. So now I'm also the guy who wants to be a pilot?
3. Yes I've noticed all the 'inventions' going on from people including yourself and then the criticism based on those inventions. Its called trolling.
4. I'll put my answer to this at the end.
5. My performance as a manager begs to differ. How does that make your ego feel now?
So number 4
I reject most of them because they are founded on the philosophy of material reductionism.
1+5 Great leaders are not born or made but are the end result of someone who has had a divine experience. They are easily spotted because knowing God exists gives them total confidence and self-belief. These 'total' characteristics cannot be learnt and you arent born with them.
2. Trait theories also assume that material reductionism is correct. The mind creates the perceptions we call reality it isnt a product of those perceptions. If you live by your perceptions you stand a high chance of ending up with low confidence, defective self-image, being negative, etc. A leader is someone who doesnt let negative perceptions dictate their state of mind. In essence they are mentally strong.
3+4 Different situations do require different styles of leadership. The catch with the Authoritatian approach is it only results in very short-term motivation. This is because the staff resent the way the manager is towards them, they quickly become demotivated and quit.
6. I agree and this ties into Maslows when it comes to self-esteem and self-acutalisation.
7. Transactional theories dont address why someone hasnt performed. People dont perform for reasons - they might need training, something has demotivated them, their workload was too high etc.
8. Relationship theories are good and Maslows ties into this when it gets people to achieve their full potential.
Not meaning to sound rude and with the greatest of respect,
How the hell has someones post about not getting a job manged to make 8 pages of pure arguement ...
Blood Lust you didnt get the job, the employeer outlined why, move on find another job oppertunity,
you whine more to much .. life is already too short
and you now owe my 10 mins of my life back for having to read this ..![]()
Yes amny small business owner insisting they know more than qualified managers.
If they knew what they were on about their firms wouldnt be small now would they?
All right. Last post on that topic because I've wasted enough time and I might become rude.
I don't know if you are familiar with that forum but it is full of lovely people (with more or less experience I admit) who are always very keen to help each other. If ALL of them tell you you are acting like a j**k, don't you think it might be time to listen? Have you ever considered the possibility that you are wrong?
If no, do yourself a favour. Ask some friends and family to read this topic and ask them to tell you honestly what they think about it, you might be surprised.
As for me, I am 30. I graduated from one of the best business school in Europe ( I have read the same books as you), I used to work as a manager for a leading strategic consulting company and I now run a successful restaurant in London. A second opening is due next year. I don't care about Maslow. I care about people (staff and customers).
And you, you are looking for job.
Search the error.
What utter trash ... really
It has nothing to do with knowledge, everyone is learning everyday is human nature.
Samll business reamin samll for a number of reasons, picking one as the basis for your arguement shows you are a complete folly.
Im done