Best UK Hosting for £15 per month?

A

arnydnxluk

What problems have you been running into so far? It sounds like you may have some specific requirements if you're not happy with all of those providers. It would be helpful to let us know what those requirements are in order to point you in the right direction.
 
Upvote 0

ryedale

Contributor
Free Member
Dec 17, 2013
1,554
369
50
Malton
£150 is incredibly over-exaggerated isn't it. You could get dedicated hosting for £30 realistically.

Depends entirely what you want and what level of support you want!

You might want a dual octacore with 128GB Ram costing several hundred a month or a small dual core processor with 4GB for a lot less :)

Either way, it's not possible for £15 which is why I thought I'd check !
 
Upvote 0

KM-Tiger

Free Member
Aug 10, 2003
10,346
1
2,893
Bexley, Kent
Ah if we talking vms then, yes there's plenty of super cheap options. I was presuming he wanted a stand alone dedicated server box when he said dedicated
Just read the OP again, and yes he did say dedicated, which we would take to mean dedicated hardware, though the distinction is getting less and less important.

As ever, what are the requirements?
 
Upvote 0

Jolt.co.uk

Free Member
Mar 1, 2011
506
75
Any suggestions? Iv tried tso, krystal, fasthosts and many more. Does anyone know of any dedicated servers for £15 per month?

At £15 it becomes hard to cover the colocation cost - conditioned, redundant power, air conditioning security and all of the datacentre running costs.... we all know how much electricity here is!

If you can increase your budget £10 or so, you can start to find some entry level servers.
 
Upvote 0

TJ Bakewell

Free Member
Dec 17, 2015
14
0
Actually it is.

A very basic VM with someone like Digital Ocean or Bytemark is less than that.

No bells, whistles, or panels, but enough to run a website, or even a handful if they are low volume.

Ah if we talking vms then, yes there's plenty of super cheap options. I was presuming he wanted a stand alone dedicated server box when he said dedicated

Just read the OP again, and yes he did say dedicated, which we would take to mean dedicated hardware, though the distinction is getting less and less important.

As ever, what are the requirements?

At £15 it becomes hard to cover the colocation cost - conditioned, redundant power, air conditioning security and all of the datacentre running costs.... we all know how much electricity here is!

If you can increase your budget £10 or so, you can start to find some entry level servers.

Brilliant, thanks for feedback guys. I need a server that will host one wordpress site, that's all. Due to the size of the site I would like it to be dedicated, in order to retain fast load times. The site will be made up of about 15 - 20 pages.
 
Upvote 0
A

arnydnxluk

I would definitely recommend a VM over a dedicated server with the given budget. The result will be better hardware, better reliability, permanent console access, snapshots, etc.

Small VM + nginx + php-fpm + mariadb = job done. (don't forget backups and basic monitoring)

If you're not comfortable managing the server yourself then you'll probably need to stick with shared hosting or raise your budget a fair bit for a managed server.
 
  • Like
Reactions: KM-Tiger
Upvote 0
We have 19 active sites, one of which has several hundred pages, many with images. We hire regular server space for $5 a month in Florida and another $5 space in S.Korea. In 15 years, the Florida service went out for a day.

A separate server for 20 pages is just plain silly!

All these major services are mirrored in a separate country, so down-time is seldom, if ever, an issue. Most of these small server companies in the UK are not mirrored outside of the UK.
 
Upvote 0

ryedale

Contributor
Free Member
Dec 17, 2013
1,554
369
50
Malton
It's very unlikely that you'd need even a VM for that

We have Wordpress and Joomla sites running with hundreds of pages and very high daily visitor levels that don't remotely trouble our shared servers.

Good shared hosting should be absolutely fine. I would certainly try that first anyway and see how it works for you. Avoid the mass market hosts because their shared servers will be overcrowded and poorly set up.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

fisicx

Moderator
Sep 12, 2006
46,818
8
15,453
Aldershot
www.aerin.co.uk
Due to the size of the site I would like it to be dedicated, in order to retain fast load times. The site will be made up of about 15 - 20 pages.
You don't need a dedicated server. Good shared hosting will do the job. What speeds a site up the way it was built more than the server. Even on a dedicated server a poorly built site can be really slow.
 
Upvote 0

Alan

Free Member
  • Aug 16, 2011
    7,089
    1,974
    Any one thinking they need a dedicated server for a website needs their head examining with scalable cloud engines from Amazon / Azure / Google Cloud etc

    A small low volume WordPress site can be run on say a Google Compute Engine for less than $5 per month, and close to instantly upgradable to more powerful engines as and when traffic grows
     
    • Like
    Reactions: The Byre
    Upvote 0

    Latest Articles