VAT threshold cut proposal stokes MTD fears for small businesses

  1. VAT
    Francois Badenhorst

    Francois Badenhorst Business Editor, UKBF & AWEB Staff Member

    91 18
    11 |

    One million British small businesses face being brought into VAT if the government accepts the Office of Tax Simplification’s VAT reform recommendations.

    The OTS report, published today, suggests numerous changes to a VAT system “awash with layers of complexity”. The blockbuster recommendation is to drastically lower the VAT threshold from its current level of £85,000 (one of the highest in the world).

    The report doesn’t make an outright recommendation, but it does ponder the consequences of lowering the threshold to a level that is close to or below the national average wage (£26,000).

    This would bring around one million extra businesses into the VAT fold, and “make it harder for businesses that wish to illegally evade VAT to remain undiscovered”.

    A lower threshold would also herald MTD’s return as a relatively immediate concern for small businesses. The OTS report admits: “Many small businesses would also face increased administrative costs”, since “a lower threshold would result in a greater number of businesses being mandated and required to obtain relevant software to submit returns to HMRC”.

    The burden on an already stretched HMRC would be pretty severe, too. “HMRC would suddenly have a million new VAT applications,” said Neil Warren, an independent VAT expert. “It would probably take them a year to work through it.”

    How the government would potentially go about introducing the radical lowering of the VAT threshold is another burning issue. According to Warren, there are a couple of approaches.

    “They could bring it down by £10,000 every year for five years, for example,” said Warren. But this would only move the “cliff edge” the OTS identifies in its report, where many growing businesses deliberately avoid expanding beyond the VAT threshold.

    It results in a “very visible bunching of businesses just before the VAT threshold, and an equally large drop in the number of businesses with turnovers just above the threshold,” the OTS wrote.

    Lowering the threshold gradually, Warren said, could exacerbate this issue further. “You’re creating a different figure on the cliff edge. Sometimes the bold measures are the best ones”.

    If the threshold was to be lowered, Britain’s small businesses would also become closely acquainted with VAT’s byzantine, sometimes arcane rules: as Warren puts it, “shark infested waters”.

    The VAT system is riddled with all sorts of taxonomic gymnastics: after an epic court battle, Jaffa Cakes were classified as a cake, not a chocolate-covered biscuit, so are zero-rated. Similarly, a gingerbread man with chocolate eyes is zero-rated, but if it has chocolate trousers it is standard rated.

    If small businesses are brought into the VAT system, all of this will need to be ironed out, said the OTS’s tax director Paul Morton. The OTS report says business will require “better and more accessible guidance” and “a less uncertain penalty system”.

    And the report zeroes in on specific areas of technical difficulty, including: the partial exemption regime, the capital goods scheme, the option to tax and other special schemes.

    “This report presents an opportunity to start addressing the many anomalies of VAT,” said Angela Knight, chair of the OTS Board. “The tax is awash with layers of complexity reflecting both its evolution over the last 45 years and aspects of the Purchase Tax that VAT replaced.

    “For small businesses, this report will propose ways of simplifying many irritating administrative technicalities and kick off a debate about the registration threshold.”

    This article was originally published on our sister site, AccountingWEB.

  2. UK Contractor Accountant

    UK Contractor Accountant UKBF Big Shot Full Member - Verified Business

    4,311 725
    I am with Singapore's VAT threshold of £500,000.
    Last edited: Nov 8, 2017
    Posted: Nov 8, 2017 By: UK Contractor Accountant Member since: Sep 18, 2013
    Caledonian TV likes this.
  3. Page

    Page UKBF Big Shot Free Member

    3,546 265
    I think it is a great idea

    But throw in simplified reporting for smaller businesses - rather than one size fits all
    Last edited: Nov 9, 2017
    Posted: Nov 9, 2017 By: Page Member since: Jul 28, 2007
  4. Pat Walsh

    Pat Walsh UKBF Contributor Full Member

    55 18
    More red tape? More admin? More reporting?
    No thanks!
    Posted: Nov 10, 2017 By: Pat Walsh Member since: Apr 14, 2017
    Caledonian TV and Caro53 like this.
  5. Matthew Barsauckas

    Matthew Barsauckas UKBF Contributor Full Member

    54 9
    Hope this does not come to fruition Francois.

    Too much happening in the UK Business economy for further issues and red tape.

    Matthew Barsauckas - MD.
    T: 0141 343 7644.
    Posted: Nov 10, 2017 By: Matthew Barsauckas Member since: May 15, 2010
    Caledonian TV and Caro53 like this.
  6. Philip Hoyle

    Philip Hoyle UKBF Ace Free Member

    2,226 1,083
    Reducing the threshold to national minimum wage???? Why??? What's a wage level got to do with a businesses sales?
    Anyway, reducing it to £26k would cause inflation as all those smaller businesses increased their prices to add VAT, and/or reduce tax take because more work would be done "cash in hand" to avoid the VAT.
    Posted: Nov 10, 2017 By: Philip Hoyle Member since: Apr 3, 2007
    Caledonian TV likes this.
  7. Chris Coulson

    Chris Coulson UKBF Newcomer Free Member

    5 3
    This is terrifying. My product to the public costs £400, so overnight, my product will go up in price by £100!
    I can't see that as being good for my business. :-(
    Posted: Nov 11, 2017 By: Chris Coulson Member since: Dec 30, 2015
    Caledonian TV likes this.
  8. Spongebob

    Spongebob UKBF Ace Free Member

    2,109 1,072
    The main problem with the current threshold is that it acts as a brake on business expansion.

    A small business providing products or services direct to the public suddenly has to charge VAT on all its turnover as soon as the VAT threshold is breached. The choice is then either to raise prices by 20% or to absorb some or all of the increase.

    There is an enormous incentive on such businesses instead to limit their turnover so as to stay under the VAT registration threshold. After all, if it is possible to raise retail prices by 20% without meeting consumer resistance, why not simply put the prices up anyway, do a lot less work, and make more profit?

    If this cliff edge was not there businesses could expand organically and take on extra staff without worrying about the collapse in profitability caused by VAT registration.

    Whether to raise or lower the threshold? On balance, I would say that it would be better to lower it considerably - but not until after I have retired!:)
    Last edited: Nov 13, 2017
    Posted: Nov 13, 2017 By: Spongebob Member since: Dec 9, 2008
    lesvatadvice likes this.
  9. Financial-Modeller

    Financial-Modeller UKBF Regular Full Member

    132 37
    ...err, would it?

    I thought VAT was 20%
    Posted: Nov 15, 2017 By: Financial-Modeller Member since: Jul 3, 2012
  10. Financial-Modeller

    Financial-Modeller UKBF Regular Full Member

    132 37
    Genuine question for any VAT experts on here; is there any legal obstacle for small businesses faced with this situation to operate one business that is VAT-registered to invoice VAT-registered customers, and one business that is not VAT-registered to serve current non-VAT-registered customers up to the prevailing threshold?
    Posted: Nov 15, 2017 By: Financial-Modeller Member since: Jul 3, 2012
  11. lesvatadvice

    lesvatadvice UKBF Regular Free Member

    684 107
    Yes there is. The VAT Act contains provisions targetting exactly this type of arrangement. And case law is on HMRC's side on this one, as well.
    Not recommended.
    Posted: Nov 15, 2017 By: lesvatadvice Member since: Jul 7, 2011
    Financial-Modeller likes this.
  12. Financial-Modeller

    Financial-Modeller UKBF Regular Full Member

    132 37
    Thank you.

    I thought it unlikely that HMRC would allow it, but worth asking the question in case there was a benefit to members on here.
    Posted: Nov 16, 2017 By: Financial-Modeller Member since: Jul 3, 2012