By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
Do you claim that blog catalog links are useless, moreover harmful?Think about it logically. Google is looking for a reason to rank your website. After it has finished indexing the site it will look elsewhere for endoresments in the form of inbound links.
If it finds a link in a directory that is mixed in with 100 other similar links with nothing more than a bare bones description this is hardly an endorsement. On the other hand if it finds a link extolling the quality of your service then google is going to give that link the thumbs up.
Socilas media sites can be very good for traffic but the links are pretty much worthless. One reason is for this is the explosion in social networking, there are hundreds of thousands of sites and a good number of the memebers only reason for existance is to promote their own website. If you do the same then you will just get lost in the plethora of spammy links that abound in social media sites.
BTW, you do realise that while your site is down for development you are going to lose all of your ranking - google will drop all your pages from the index.
Yep, Start with a fantastic website.Does anyone have any proven link building tips?
Why's that? I have exactly the same feeling about social media sitesI feel that most of these directory sites are a bit of a con.
See aboveAlso, do links from social media sites count?
Once you get the right content social media sites do the work for you.
The link value I dont really know, but the genuine traffic is excellent.
But how many actually convert? It would be muich better to get 50 conversions from 100 highly targetted visitors a day than 10 conversions from 1000 social media visitors.
thanks for your input - My site is ready to go but I just want to make sure I have a rough plan in place before pushing it live. I guess I'll just aim to get as many links as possible from anywhere I can!
I know I have to get them from relevant sites with relevant content etc. I just meant I'll get as many as I can of those
thanks for your input - My site is ready to go but I just want to make sure I have a rough plan in place before pushing it live. I guess I'll just aim to get as many links as possible from anywhere I can!
are link selling agencies any good?
Still pointless. It's not the links YOU get, it's the links other people give to you. What you want is for someone to endorse your services in blog post or article. These sort of links have to be earned and the way to do this is to build a site that is interesting, informative and adds value to the visitor. Just doing this can often be enough to put a niche site on page one. And if the site meets the needs of your visitors then the inbound links will come. If you try and rush things and go get hundreds of inbound links in a short period you may well trigger the alarms at Google as it will appear to be an attempt to boost your ranking through link building.
Rubbish. So you're saying that link building is pointless? You can't do anything to aid the number of inbound links to your site? Now come on!
Rubbish. So you're saying that link building is pointless? You can't do anything to aid the number of inbound links to your site? Now come on!
I agree with Paws on this one. I ask a site to add my link and they do, how are google to know that the link isn't a natural endorsment
I'm on page 1 for 'effective web design' and 'web design advice' and whole range of other similar searches.
If you ask for a link and it ends up on a links page then the value of that link is virtually zero.
Because Google has got a very sophisitcated PageRank technology system. If you ask for a link and it ends up on a links page then the value of that link is virtually zero.
This page for example: http://www.uk-jumping.com/links.htm sticks out like a sore thumb as nothing more than a link building page.
there is no way in the world that google can determine whether a link was asked for or was an organic link. If you can get a page in the top 10 for 'free bets' with no links then maybe i'll believe some of your claims. Infact do it before march 22nd and i'll donate £50 to a charity of your choice, and thats a sincere offer
£50! is that all?...how long have you been trying to do it?
Similar in terms of low competitiveness? We're page one for "Dog Collars", "ID Tags", "Dog Accessories" etc etc. We wouldn't be if it wasn't for our link building.
there is no way in the world that google can determine whether a link was asked for or was an organic link.
yes, problem?
nice edit btw, my point is if the poster claims links are not important they will be able to place a site in the top ten for this term. I've dangled a generous and genuine carrot to allow them to put their points into evidence
Ok, ok, I admit defeat! I've never said link building wasn't a good thing to do, it's just that too many consider quantity over quality. That's all I'm trying to point out.
Really?
Of course you can ask for a link but it needs to be integrated into the main part of the site as an endorsement to have value. If the link is on a links page then Google won't give that link much credibility. The google blog even advises that this not a good strategy.
like i say mate, my offer is there. some of the major sites in my field have resource or links pages so what you are saying is if i was on the links page of some of the major hitters in my field then that link would be worthless? i beg to differ
If you write a press release and include the link back to the site and then syndicate the release then the value of those links will be much lower than an article which cites you as a resource.
Google even tells us that an endorsement is the best type of link to get but also warns against activities designed to manipulate PageRank.
I don't say that link building isn't important, it's just not as important as it was.
If you write a press release and include the link back to the site and then syndicate the release then the value of those links will be much lower than an article which cites you as a resource. What really makes the difference is the relevancy of the target page. Google even tells us that an endorsement is the best type of link to get but also warns against activities designed to manipulate PageRank.
And quality content on your own site will help your ranking more than that same content on another site. I can't find the source but one of the Google engineers even showed how the link juice reduces for inbound links, you lose 15% for every link in the chain.
Building relevent quality 1 way links is the most important part of seo along with onpage optimisation.
to say link building isnt as important is incorrect the search engines have just changed how they value certian links and devalued things like directory and reciprocal links and I say devalued not quite 100% worthless.