By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
Make sure you lock the webpage down, or I might be using them, tooHahahaha.
I was talking about scraping various demographic info from postcodes. I can do that, with agreement of the site that provides the demographic info.
Postcode lookups (to view the address or address combinations) can be expensive... the software and user licences can be a fortune. The trick is to find a website offering them for free (because they sell a different core service) and to make a request when ever you need one. This is feasible if you don't need many. If you need millions, you would take the site down. But one every minute or two will be completely unnoticed.
There are badly coded websites that record your lookup when the result page is displayed, rather than when the request for the query is made... so... as long as you go in and grab the result rather than displaying the results page, you can make as many as you like.
Obviously can't say where to find this, but there are many companies "offering" this data which they have protected rather badly.
I agree. But when people allow this to be used, and have no copyright or wording to say "don't do it"... it is very grey area.
Why should you have to pay to find a postcode address. It is all just freely available info, nothing top secret.
Yeah, no real argument about it.
I think it's the Royal Mail or Post Office.
Sooner Google or someone makes it freely available, the better.
The same thing with bank sort codes and resolving bank address info.
I'm not in ethical nightmares about looking at a postcode, though![]()
I don't get it. The site I use says free postcodes (and free address lookups). Free... that's what it says. Am I missing something here? What's wrong with filling your boots if it's free?
When God said to Moses "Hey, you with the beard! Would you like a commandment?" then Moses naturally asked how much it would cost. "It's free," said the Lord. Quick as a flash, Moses said "I'll take ten!"
I don't get it. The site I use says free postcodes (and free address lookups). Free... that's what it says. Am I missing something here? What's wrong with filling your boots if it's free?
When God said to Moses "Hey, you with the beard! Would you like a commandment?" then Moses naturally asked how much it would cost. "It's free," said the Lord. Quick as a flash, Moses said "I'll take ten!"
Well, that may be the case (how Ozzy describes it), but... I am with Wild Goose.
The data has been offered free, and there is no notice saying you can only have one go. There's nothing saying I MUST accept the cookie, so if I get the free data without the cookie, that's up to me I think.
I do agree it is free, but if people were bothered, they would a) protect it, b) check the logs and see which IP is making requests, c) charge for it.
If they say: "only one go for free", that's different. If they say "free", fill your boots. They may have clever marketing ploy to make their money from adverting or something, and they want to encourage as much use as possible... who knows?
Do you know where all the car images on my site come from?
No, neither do I, I have no idea who holds copyright. Should i buy stock images of each car??? Or take them myself?
You are living in a perfect fantasy world.
You struggle with all this, too. You have a very image -light site, but the images on your "car leasing" page were not taken by you and you haven't paid for them.
If I added every possible cost, it would be impossible to trade. None of us meet the disability access stuff on our websites for instance. Are you gonna pay to meet that?
I hadn't given disability access a thought for my site. Umm actually that's not true - I gave it a thought and did away with CSS and used fixed font sizes instead (I figured that anyone with poor eyesight would set their monitor to 800 x 600 rather than paddle about with IE font sizes).
But along the lines you are talking of Ling, in my world nobody seems to give a monkey's scratch about:
The Information Commissioner - so many firms who ought to register don't bother registering as data controllers under the DPA;
Dept of Trade - guidelines recommend a 5 to 10 minute break from the screen every 50 mins for computer operators;
Employee Handbook - The staff procedure and rulebook that's meant to hang from your noticeboard or some such similar place;
Fire Drills - Hands up anyone who actually bothers with statutory fire drills (eeek I've just noticed our fire hydrant's vamoosed);
Ageism - Although I read this week of a 50 year old woman, chartered certified accountant and formerly in a senior managerial position, who made a six figure bundle by applying for jobs as a trainee and then suing under the new ageism act. Beats working!
There are far too many rules and regulations by which we must now comply; we'd never get anything done if we took any notice of most of them. Postcodes and disabilities included.
Even that old nag of yours looks copyright familiar Ling - (upline on my wife's side of the family).
Getting a little heated here and slightly off topic at times, but as this does affect a friend of mine I will throw in another comment as I'm on the same side of the fence as FE.If as you say they must be happy about it or would have put more security in then why not write to them and openly state what you are doing and get an agreement?
Again the question is it legal? - write to the company you are getting it from stating exactly what you are doing and fine it will be.
They provide a free service. They don't say "not for commercial use". They have knowledge people will be using it, as they offer the data to be used. I simply use it multiple times. Easy. The whole point is that the site makes money from other services and the postcode search is a sideshow. I don't hammer it 10,000 times daily, I just check customer addresses/postcodes. Simple.
Jeez FE, you are going mad.
I would suggest, if you paid for those images, you were short-changed.
"What has the above got to do with taking data from someone, that has paid for it, without their knowledge and using for commercial use?"
They provide a free service. They don't say "not for commercial use". They have knowledge people will be using it, as they offer the data to be used. I simply use it multiple times. Easy. The whole point is that the site makes money from other services and the postcode search is a sideshow. I don't hammer it 10,000 times daily, I just check customer addresses/postcodes. Simple.
Agree it's a scandal that the poscode info is not publicly available, on a free to use basis.
Without you enlightening what site or service you are using it is not possible to give a clear comment, but you have implied in your past messages that may be exploiting a loophole in a businesses website by blocking cookies. This would naturally imply that you are doing something wrong by trying to circumvent a business owners attempt to stop people abusing their system.That's just silly as they clearly say you can check postcodes free. So I do.
Actually mis-deliveries costs the Royal Mail hundreds of thousands of pounds, because they do not charge for the "Return to Sender" or manually written "please redliver to..." service they provide. They redeliver millions of letters correctly at their cost each year.Ironically this then means that I save the cost of mis-deliveries on my letters to the customer, perhaps an accountant has worked out that the Royal Mail BENEFIT from letters with incorrect addresses on, so they do their best to profit from it.
That's just silly as they clearly say you can check postcodes free. So I do. How is it stealing if it's free? That's a complete misrepresentation and making it look really bad. And I am not bulk-hammering, just checking each customer address, once. So not a "load" at all. Your exaggeration is ridiculous.
----
The Royal Mail service has to be done via their website and includes devices to stop my computer getting the info (ie a human has to retype some numbers).
My problem with that is the level of difficulty (logging on, manually entering details - possibilities for errors, entering anti-scraping digits, reading info, manually comparing info, all in a separate website to my app).
Whereas with my own system, the post office address simply appears next to the customer's address (everything having been done in the background), making a quick eye-check possible and potential mistakes corrected.
Ironically this then means that I save the cost of mis-deliveries on my letters to the customer, and decrease the chance of personal finance docs going astray. Perhaps an accountant has worked out that the Royal Mail BENEFIT from letters with incorrect addresses on, so they do their best to profit from it.
Then clearly Ozzy is recommending/suggesting the illegal use of a service. Grow up FE.
Do you think anyone reads the T and Cs and STOPS because they are a Ltd company? That's nonsense.
Your anger is affecting your typing.
Oh per-leassssssssssse. This is not robbing a bank or stealing stock from a market stall.
Certainly not gonna disclose as some here would try to have it stopped. No one cares, if they did they would not allow it. I am within my rights not to want a cookie. That argument gets very surious.
Then, they should make it possible to machine-check correct addresses. It is obvious. What possible benefit is there to stopping this? UK business would benefit massively, it would un-clog the post office and save £probably millions.
Sheesh. Mugging old ladies now? I am checking an address or two every hour.
Fair do's, I just did a quick search as I seem to recall they had the service on their website. I did not check their T&C's, but in business it is advisable to read every contract you enter into otherwise you could end up falling fowl of the law without even realising it.Then clearly Ozzy is recommending/suggesting the illegal use of a service. Grow up FE.
Do you think anyone reads the T and Cs and STOPS because they are a Ltd company? That's nonsense.
This reads as if you are actually saying you are knowingly abusing a business owners website loophole, which is effectively stealing from a business owner of you are.Certainly not gonna disclose as some here would try to have it stopped. No one cares, if they did they would not allow it. I am within my rights not to want a cookie. That argument gets very surious.
Yes I do agree with you, they should, but that isn't the discussion here. They wont though because they charge huge amounts of money for it. A nice little earner for selling old rope. See the price list here...Then, they should make it possible to machine-check correct addresses. It is obvious. What possible benefit is there to stopping this? UK business would benefit massively, it would un-clog the post office and save £probably millions.
.... and according to Ozzy , it's advisable to read all this before checking a postcode, or using the service.
I say: Crazzzy.
Ozzy, no-one reads all the T and Cs on stuff like web-apps and services. That is obvious.
Phew, thanks God for that!
FE If Ling wasn't in the same line of business as you would you even care?
I doubt it....
Ling, this is what my specific point was in relation to. I'm saying that if you are entering into an ongoing arrangement then it would be advisable to check the T&C's because if you don't then you don't know whether you are breaking the law.However, if anyone was going to make regular use of an ongoing service, then I would advisable read their Terms & Conditions. If you haven't read the T&C's of this other website you use, then how do you not know that you are or are not breaking the law by doing what you are doing?
Now, it's the "boasting" that is wrong
I can say, without a shadow of doubt, I am not breaking any T and C's by boasting.
My own T and C's say (written ages ago):
Terms very simple:
I provide a straightforward service, if anything is unclear, please to contact me.
... loads of guff which is generally rubbish ...
You are damn lucky that the laws of England and Wales (and not of the People's Republic of China) govern these conditions of use and you agree that the English courts shall have exclusive jurisdiction in any dispute.
Breaking the T&Cs of a website is very different to breaking the law...