Postcoding

FE

Free Member
Sep 16, 2005
418
22
England
I was talking about scraping various demographic info from postcodes. I can do that, with agreement of the site that provides the demographic info.

Postcode lookups (to view the address or address combinations) can be expensive... the software and user licences can be a fortune. The trick is to find a website offering them for free (because they sell a different core service) and to make a request when ever you need one. This is feasible if you don't need many. If you need millions, you would take the site down. But one every minute or two will be completely unnoticed.

There are badly coded websites that record your lookup when the result page is displayed, rather than when the request for the query is made... so... as long as you go in and grab the result rather than displaying the results page, you can make as many as you like.

Obviously can't say where to find this, but there are many companies "offering" this data which they have protected rather badly.


Edit reply as not needed
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

FE

Free Member
Sep 16, 2005
418
22
England
I agree. But when people allow this to be used, and have no copyright or wording to say "don't do it"... it is very grey area.

Agree and was just editing my reposnse as it was an observation i made

Also a big difference between ethical and legal as i am sure you are aware. As i am sure you know they did not design the site for you to do that you have just found a way around it. Legal - possible - ethical ?

Anyway i edited my reply as not my place to make observations

FE
 
Upvote 0

FE

Free Member
Sep 16, 2005
418
22
England
Why should you have to pay to find a postcode address. It is all just freely available info, nothing top secret.


As i said above before you edited again it did not need an observation from me but its not free? who compiles this info, who pays for the hosting, updating of the database etc etc. If it was free then you would not have to ''trick'' others websites.

The debate of should it be free is completely different.

Anyway as i said not my place to question your ethics and why i edited the original reply as soon as i posted

FE
 
Upvote 0

FE

Free Member
Sep 16, 2005
418
22
England
Yeah, no real argument about it.

I think it's the Royal Mail or Post Office.

Sooner Google or someone makes it freely available, the better.

The same thing with bank sort codes and resolving bank address info.

I'm not in ethical nightmares about looking at a postcode, though :)

Yes i would ike to see it freely available but its not yet which is the point i was making.

As for the ethics then everyone is different but if the data is not free or the methodology you are using in obtaining is not recognised by the data owner then it does come down to ethics.

These will differ from person to person but my point is / was you are openly posting under your ltd company name and could do more damage than harm.

FE
 
Upvote 0

Wild Goose

Free Member
Aug 16, 2008
1,337
412
Great Metropolis
I don't get it. The site I use says free postcodes (and free address lookups). Free... that's what it says. Am I missing something here? What's wrong with filling your boots if it's free?

When God said to Moses "Hey, you with the beard! Would you like a commandment?" then Moses naturally asked how much it would cost. "It's free," said the Lord. Quick as a flash, Moses said "I'll take ten!"
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Dwebs-Ltd

Free Member
Nov 29, 2007
2,019
264
Blackpool
I don't get it. The site I use says free postcodes (and free address lookups). Free... that's what it says. Am I missing something here? What's wrong with filling your boots if it's free?

When God said to Moses "Hey, you with the beard! Would you like a commandment?" then Moses naturally asked how much it would cost. "It's free," said the Lord. Quick as a flash, Moses said "I'll take ten!"

Which site is that then?
 
Upvote 0

FE

Free Member
Sep 16, 2005
418
22
England
I don't get it. The site I use says free postcodes (and free address lookups). Free... that's what it says. Am I missing something here? What's wrong with filling your boots if it's free?

When God said to Moses "Hey, you with the beard! Would you like a commandment?" then Moses naturally asked how much it would cost. "It's free," said the Lord. Quick as a flash, Moses said "I'll take ten!"


You have to pay for the data. So if a site e,g, UKBF pays for the data and allows its users to look it up free of charge thats fine.

What Ling was suggesting is that you can enter the same search on a different site which will then go to a site offering it for their users / members, grab the results and display on that other site i.e. not paying for the raw data.

Many like the Royal Mail website prevent this by putting security in. Others are not so security conscious and so it is possible by using code.

A bit like giving a free sample for visiting a shop. Its not desined for anothr shop to offer the same only for every customer that comes in and asks for one the owner of the other shop to run down the street, pick up the gift, run back and give to their customer.

Legal - possible, ethical - opinion

That was the discussion

FE
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Ozzy

Founder of UKBF
UKBF Staff
  • Feb 9, 2003
    8,402
    11
    3,542
    Northampton, UK
    bdgroup.co.uk
    There is an issue of exploiting legitimate business owners who pay for this data from a provider, costing them money as mentioned above. The licence fees from Royal Mail for this data are very expensive (not freely available) and are covered by veru strict usage T&C's. Different licences for internal and external use, limiting the number of searches you are allowed to do between internal and external use depending on the licence you buy.

    My personal opinion, if you want to to use a postcode search then either find somone who clearly states they are free or subscribe to a legitimate service provide. Don't skim them from another business owners website costing them money, it isn't fair nor right to do so. It is effectively stealing.

    If the OP wants to know someone who provides postcode lookup data then a friend of mine runs The Company Merchant that provides postcode lookups.
     
    • Like
    Reactions: FE
    Upvote 0

    FE

    Free Member
    Sep 16, 2005
    418
    22
    England
    Well, that may be the case (how Ozzy describes it), but... I am with Wild Goose.

    The data has been offered free, and there is no notice saying you can only have one go. There's nothing saying I MUST accept the cookie, so if I get the free data without the cookie, that's up to me I think.

    I do agree it is free, but if people were bothered, they would a) protect it, b) check the logs and see which IP is making requests, c) charge for it.

    If they say: "only one go for free", that's different. If they say "free", fill your boots. They may have clever marketing ploy to make their money from adverting or something, and they want to encourage as much use as possible... who knows?

    Ling do they say ''you can interrogate their database, retrieve and display on your website''? Have you asked if you can implement this practice? do they know you do it?

    As i have said many times the fact that they may be incompotent with their security does not make it right in my opinion (my opinion alone and probably not shared by others).

    Again is it legal? i don't know you would have to check the exact T&C's their confidentiality etc etc as one thing is for sure it will not say ''fill your boots''

    Is it ethical? No not in my opinion

    If all was so certain then why not contact the people with the data and get written approval which would make it all very ethical. By assuming its ok as you can get away with it does not make it ethical or right in my opinion.

    If its data that you like and wish to display why do you not pay for it and allow other sites to display for free and set the trend?

    FE
     
    Upvote 0

    FE

    Free Member
    Sep 16, 2005
    418
    22
    England
    Ling i take the above is tongue in cheek yes?

    Are you really saying because others do it then its right?

    You are representing a Limited company surely because illegal DVD's are produced does not make it right or ethical to watch them because someone else has?

    The site who have paid for the data have chosen to allow THEIR users to view it for free. It was not intended for other sites to take and display as their own

    If as you say they must be happy about it or would have put more security in then why not write to them and openly state what you are doing and get an agreement?

    Again the question is it legal? - write to the company you are getting it from stating exactly what you are doing and fine it will be.

    Again is it ethical? - Because someone we know has watched an illegal DVD then sure it must be? come on you are a Director of a Limited company!

    With regards CAP data come on you surely know more than that. There are several CAP data packages

    1) list of all cars, manufacturers, accessories, costs, p11 d values
    2) list of cars & vans as per above (obviously without p11d for lcv's)
    3) RV and maintenance values

    You do not need it because you run off other broker systems that have already purchased the data and through your agreement can view it i.e. you do not run your own pricing model its done for you by the funder. If you have a system where you run your own quotes then you can either manually enter all line by line and then ensure accuracy or pay for it but most of the data above is not freely available its just you do not need it all as you use others i.e. a broker system where they have paid for it

    I will not go on as again assume you are having a laugh as you justify not paying for data and taking from someone’s site because they do not state you can not do it have you investigated their copyright statements etc etc or simply because you can it makes it right.

    Again its all about ethics and they differ from business to business and person to person but justifying you and your business taking data from another site because ''we have all watched an illegal DVD'' is something i would expect from a child justifying why they have done something wrong not a Director of an ethical Limited company

    If all so ok why not write to the owner of the data of the website you get it form and ask permission surely he or she will be ok with it as probably on their sofa watching an illegal DVD with a pair of fake Nikes on their feet!

    Sorry but it really annoys me that you can call people dim for legally and ethically buying data for the business that is core when others simply steal it in my opinion and justify it because others do it. That does not make it right or ethical and to be honest I would not use any business that has that outlook or ethics but as you say there are many illegal DVD’s sold so hey it must be ok.

    I mean you could say we all know someone who has been burgled and some who has sold or purchased stolen goods. That must be ok as well yes?

    Again I will assume you were joking above otherwise all I can say is I am disappointed and do not condone your customers that support those ethics.

    You state on another thread how your sales are up then stand up and be big and pay your way!

    Again, my opinion for what it is worth!

    FE
     
    Upvote 0

    Wild Goose

    Free Member
    Aug 16, 2008
    1,337
    412
    Great Metropolis
    I hadn't given disability access a thought for my site. Umm actually that's not true - I gave it a thought and did away with CSS and used fixed font sizes instead (I figured that anyone with poor eyesight would set their monitor to 800 x 600 rather than paddle about with IE font sizes).

    But along the lines you are talking of Ling, in my world nobody seems to give a monkey's scratch about:
    The Information Commissioner - so many firms who ought to register don't bother registering as data controllers under the DPA;
    Dept of Trade - guidelines recommend a 5 to 10 minute break from the screen every 50 mins for computer operators;
    Employee Handbook - The staff procedure and rulebook that's meant to hang from your noticeboard or some such similar place;
    Fire Drills - Hands up anyone who actually bothers with statutory fire drills (eeek I've just noticed our fire hydrant's vamoosed);
    Ageism - Although I read this week of a 50 year old woman, chartered certified accountant and formerly in a senior managerial position, who made a six figure bundle by applying for jobs as a trainee and then suing under the new ageism act. Beats working!

    There are far too many rules and regulations by which we must now comply; we'd never get anything done if we took any notice of most of them. Postcodes and disabilities included.

    Even that old nag of yours looks copyright familiar Ling - (upline on my wife's side of the family).
     
    Last edited:
    Upvote 0

    FE

    Free Member
    Sep 16, 2005
    418
    22
    England
    Do you know where all the car images on my site come from?

    No, neither do I, I have no idea who holds copyright. Should i buy stock images of each car??? Or take them myself?

    You are living in a perfect fantasy world.

    You struggle with all this, too. You have a very image -light site, but the images on your "car leasing" page were not taken by you and you haven't paid for them.

    If I added every possible cost, it would be impossible to trade. None of us meet the disability access stuff on our websites for instance. Are you gonna pay to meet that?

    You are changing the subject to meet your needs

    The topic is about:

    You as Lingscars Ltd accessing someone’s site who pays for data to display to their users, taking that data for a commercial use for your own means. The reasoning you have given for this is because we all know someone who has watched a copied DVD - come on don't change the subject

    With regards Fleet Efficiency Ltd

    Every image on our site has been paid for. We pay for CAP data. Any image on our site we that has copyright we have paid for. Any image on our site that we do not have copyright for we have permission from the originator. So DO NOT put us in your pool of poor ethical decisions.

    The bottom line is and the subject is you are taking data because you can and because ''we all know someone who has watched a copied DVD'' That in my opinion is pathetic. Its not a perfect world i live in but a business one where i do not believe in theft. Yes we could save thousands by adopting your approach and steal data but there again i could also implement armed bank robbery as a strategy!

    Very lame in my opinion and very disappointed in you and your company that feels its right that your sales are up but you continue to take data others have paid for because you can and you know someone who has watched a copied DVD. That’s not a perfect world that’s just wrong.

    FE
     
    Upvote 0

    FE

    Free Member
    Sep 16, 2005
    418
    22
    England
    So in conclusion to this why not answer:

    If all is so ok with what you are doing i.e. legal and ethical WHY DO YOU NOT CONTACT THE OWNER OF THE DATA WHERE YOU GET IT FORM AND ASK THEIR PERMISSION?

    WHY DO YOU NOT DO THAT OUT OF COURTESY IF ALL OK?
     
    Upvote 0

    FE

    Free Member
    Sep 16, 2005
    418
    22
    England
    I hadn't given disability access a thought for my site. Umm actually that's not true - I gave it a thought and did away with CSS and used fixed font sizes instead (I figured that anyone with poor eyesight would set their monitor to 800 x 600 rather than paddle about with IE font sizes).

    But along the lines you are talking of Ling, in my world nobody seems to give a monkey's scratch about:
    The Information Commissioner - so many firms who ought to register don't bother registering as data controllers under the DPA;
    Dept of Trade - guidelines recommend a 5 to 10 minute break from the screen every 50 mins for computer operators;
    Employee Handbook - The staff procedure and rulebook that's meant to hang from your noticeboard or some such similar place;
    Fire Drills - Hands up anyone who actually bothers with statutory fire drills (eeek I've just noticed our fire hydrant's vamoosed);
    Ageism - Although I read this week of a 50 year old woman, chartered certified accountant and formerly in a senior managerial position, who made a six figure bundle by applying for jobs as a trainee and then suing under the new ageism act. Beats working!

    There are far too many rules and regulations by which we must now comply; we'd never get anything done if we took any notice of most of them. Postcodes and disabilities included.

    Even that old nag of yours looks copyright familiar Ling - (upline on my wife's side of the family).

    Sorry am i missing the point

    What has the above got to do with taking data from someone, that has paid for it, without their knowledge and using for commercial use?

    The H&S regulations and HR law has what to do with this? sorry maybe i am missing the point or are you of the same opinion that no need to abide by any regulations because you also know someone who has watched a copied DVD

    The level of regulations surrounding H&S, HR etc is a complete different debate.

    I also do not agree with the 70mph maximum speed limit and we all know people that have broken it. Fact remains that if you do its illegal and you will be fined.

    The point in all of this is as a Limited business is it right to promote such practices in the open i.e. via the medium of the web.

    Ling as a Director of Lingscars Ltd clearly states she promotes her business in obtaining without consent others paid for data for her own commerical gain. its got nothing o do with if it should be free or not the fact is that it is not

    FE

    FE
     
    Upvote 0

    Ozzy

    Founder of UKBF
    UKBF Staff
  • Feb 9, 2003
    8,402
    11
    3,542
    Northampton, UK
    bdgroup.co.uk
    If as you say they must be happy about it or would have put more security in then why not write to them and openly state what you are doing and get an agreement?
    Again the question is it legal? - write to the company you are getting it from stating exactly what you are doing and fine it will be.
    Getting a little heated here and slightly off topic at times, but as this does affect a friend of mine I will throw in another comment as I'm on the same side of the fence as FE.

    This discussion is not about the ever increasing legislation that is being thrown in by government to screw businesses. It has moved onto the potential commercial theft of data from one business owner by another business owner.

    Many private number plate dealers were leaching number plate prices and availability from the DVLA website. The information was freely available from their website, but it breached the small print of their terms and conditions. It doesn't matter if someone ignored the T&C's, the fact is they were there and many businesses faced prosecution for theft.

    However, let's say this website have failed to get proper T&C's written for their company website and haven't got a clause stating something to the effect that it is not allowed to leach data from their website. Then it is no different what so ever from a market trader turning his back on his stall for a moment and someone steals a load of his stock. That doesn't make it right, it doesn't make it ethical, and it would be wrong to blame the market stall owner saying it was his own stupid fault for turning round to pick up a carrier bag to serve a customer.

    The government problems, red tape, legislation is one thing, but we are all business owners here supposedly in my mind like one great big team. Call my niave if you like but I don't care. I don't have pirate software, I pay for postcode lookups, even if opportunities arise to take advantage of another business owners mistake it would feel to me like robbing from one of your own to do so.
     
    Upvote 0

    Ozzy

    Founder of UKBF
    UKBF Staff
  • Feb 9, 2003
    8,402
    11
    3,542
    Northampton, UK
    bdgroup.co.uk
    They provide a free service. They don't say "not for commercial use". They have knowledge people will be using it, as they offer the data to be used. I simply use it multiple times. Easy. The whole point is that the site makes money from other services and the postcode search is a sideshow. I don't hammer it 10,000 times daily, I just check customer addresses/postcodes. Simple.

    The Royal Mail website provide a service where you can do this yourself on their own website, for free. Have a look here :)

    Not costing any business owner any money as getting it straight from source to run a small number of checks each day. Everyones happy :)
     
    Upvote 0

    FE

    Free Member
    Sep 16, 2005
    418
    22
    England
    Jeez FE, you are going mad.

    I would suggest, if you paid for those images, you were short-changed.

    "What has the above got to do with taking data from someone, that has paid for it, without their knowledge and using for commercial use?"


    They provide a free service. They don't say "not for commercial use". They have knowledge people will be using it, as they offer the data to be used. I simply use it multiple times. Easy. The whole point is that the site makes money from other services and the postcode search is a sideshow. I don't hammer it 10,000 times daily, I just check customer addresses/postcodes. Simple.

    Agree it's a scandal that the poscode info is not publicly available, on a free to use basis.

    Lingyou chose not to read what i write as it does not match your opinion

    For the avoidance of doubt:

    All images we display on our website that have a copyright have been paid for. All others we have permission end of story THIS IS NOT THE SUBJECT TO END OF DEBATE ON THAT.

    With regards the data:

    the website you obtain the data from issue the data for THEIR users.

    The question remains that you choose to IGNORE - If they are aware and are happy with what you are doing WHY NOT ASK THEM AND GET CONFIRMATION?????????

    The volume of times you do it is irrelevant as if you do it a few times why not us the Royal mail webiste which clearly states it is free except they have security to make sure you are not automating it.

    If the data is useful to yoru business then why not pay for it. If other websites give it away and they do nto clearly state you can obtain and use for your commercial use then why not contact them and make sure they are in agreement with you using it.

    My bank has not got a sign up saying please do not rob us today does not mean that it is ok to do it though does it?

    Now if you wish to continue this debate why not ask the website you aregetting the data to confirm that it is ok for you to obtain electronically and use for your business free of charge as ylo say they are full aware and happy with it? Would not be bcaue they may say No buy your own and put security in place top stop you doig it would it?

    Again down to ethics and watching copied DVD's i persume!

    FE
     
    Upvote 0

    Ozzy

    Founder of UKBF
    UKBF Staff
  • Feb 9, 2003
    8,402
    11
    3,542
    Northampton, UK
    bdgroup.co.uk
    That's just silly as they clearly say you can check postcodes free. So I do.
    Without you enlightening what site or service you are using it is not possible to give a clear comment, but you have implied in your past messages that may be exploiting a loophole in a businesses website by blocking cookies. This would naturally imply that you are doing something wrong by trying to circumvent a business owners attempt to stop people abusing their system.
    Ironically this then means that I save the cost of mis-deliveries on my letters to the customer, perhaps an accountant has worked out that the Royal Mail BENEFIT from letters with incorrect addresses on, so they do their best to profit from it.
    Actually mis-deliveries costs the Royal Mail hundreds of thousands of pounds, because they do not charge for the "Return to Sender" or manually written "please redliver to..." service they provide. They redeliver millions of letters correctly at their cost each year.
     
    Upvote 0

    FE

    Free Member
    Sep 16, 2005
    418
    22
    England
    That's just silly as they clearly say you can check postcodes free. So I do. How is it stealing if it's free? That's a complete misrepresentation and making it look really bad. And I am not bulk-hammering, just checking each customer address, once. So not a "load" at all. Your exaggeration is ridiculous.

    ----

    The Royal Mail service has to be done via their website and includes devices to stop my computer getting the info (ie a human has to retype some numbers).

    My problem with that is the level of difficulty (logging on, manually entering details - possibilities for errors, entering anti-scraping digits, reading info, manually comparing info, all in a separate website to my app).

    Whereas with my own system, the post office address simply appears next to the customer's address (everything having been done in the background), making a quick eye-check possible and potential mistakes corrected.

    Ironically this then means that I save the cost of mis-deliveries on my letters to the customer, and decrease the chance of personal finance docs going astray. Perhaps an accountant has worked out that the Royal Mail BENEFIT from letters with incorrect addresses on, so they do their best to profit from it.

    Ling the Royal mai website cleary states:

    You must not use this service for any purpose other than your own personal use.

    You are a limited company using for commercial use

    The differene is that their security STOPS you taking and sing against their T&C's

    Teh debate of hould it be free or not is irrelevant in this case as the FACT is that it is not

    If te Data is so god for you then WHY DO YOU NOT PAY FOR IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


    FE
     
    Upvote 0

    FE

    Free Member
    Sep 16, 2005
    418
    22
    England
    LING - Why do you feel you are entitled to free data for commercial use when others have to pay for it?

    So far your reasoning is becaue we all know someone who has watched a copied DVD & you do not do the practice a lot?

    What is the difference then if i rob my local bank just the once and i know someone who has watched a copied DVD why i should not go to jail?

    If anyone is going md or silly then i would say it is you Ling

    FE
     
    Upvote 0

    FE

    Free Member
    Sep 16, 2005
    418
    22
    England
    Then clearly Ozzy is recommending/suggesting the illegal use of a service. Grow up FE.

    Do you think anyone reads the T and Cs and STOPS because they are a Ltd company? That's nonsense.

    Your anger is affecting your typing.

    All depend how ethical you are

    Some believe mugging old ladies is correct some don't - al depends your ethics

    In terms of growing up then maybe ou need to review yourself in terms of runnin an ethical company and the duties you have as a Company Director?
     
    Upvote 0

    FE

    Free Member
    Sep 16, 2005
    418
    22
    England
    Certainly not gonna disclose as some here would try to have it stopped. No one cares, if they did they would not allow it. I am within my rights not to want a cookie. That argument gets very surious.



    Then, they should make it possible to machine-check correct addresses. It is obvious. What possible benefit is there to stopping this? UK business would benefit massively, it would un-clog the post office and save £probably millions.

    Ho can it be stopped you said they are ok with it. Are you saying they do not know and do care?

    Get your story right please!
     
    Upvote 0

    Ozzy

    Founder of UKBF
    UKBF Staff
  • Feb 9, 2003
    8,402
    11
    3,542
    Northampton, UK
    bdgroup.co.uk
    Then clearly Ozzy is recommending/suggesting the illegal use of a service. Grow up FE.

    Do you think anyone reads the T and Cs and STOPS because they are a Ltd company? That's nonsense.
    Fair do's, I just did a quick search as I seem to recall they had the service on their website. I did not check their T&C's, but in business it is advisable to read every contract you enter into otherwise you could end up falling fowl of the law without even realising it.
    Certainly not gonna disclose as some here would try to have it stopped. No one cares, if they did they would not allow it. I am within my rights not to want a cookie. That argument gets very surious.
    This reads as if you are actually saying you are knowingly abusing a business owners website loophole, which is effectively stealing from a business owner of you are.
    Then, they should make it possible to machine-check correct addresses. It is obvious. What possible benefit is there to stopping this? UK business would benefit massively, it would un-clog the post office and save £probably millions.
    Yes I do agree with you, they should, but that isn't the discussion here. They wont though because they charge huge amounts of money for it. A nice little earner for selling old rope. See the price list here...
     
    Upvote 0

    FE

    Free Member
    Sep 16, 2005
    418
    22
    England
    Ling

    You are putting every barrier in place and refuse to answer the question. Again the bank analogy - My bank does not have a sighn saying please do not rob me does not mean to say i can.

    Because you do not read T&C's does not make it legal or right

    Because we all know someone who has watched a copied DVD does not make it legal or right

    Fact is - WHY DO YOU FEEL YOU HAVE NOT GOT TO PAY FOR THE DATA

    you hav responded by

    1) you do not read T&C's
    2) you know someone who has watched a DVD

    That in my opinion is very poor and shows the ethics of both you and your company.

    Unless you wish to answer the question of why you should feel you do not have to pay for somehing and that you have a rigt to simply take without consent then this debate is closed on my behalf

    FE
     
    Upvote 0

    Ozzy

    Founder of UKBF
    UKBF Staff
  • Feb 9, 2003
    8,402
    11
    3,542
    Northampton, UK
    bdgroup.co.uk
    .... and according to Ozzy , it's advisable to read all this before checking a postcode, or using the service.

    I say: Crazzzy.

    Ozzy, no-one reads all the T and Cs on stuff like web-apps and services. That is obvious.

    If someone makes the decision not to read the T&C's of a website that is their perogative, but it still doesn't absolve them from the law. Ignorance is not an excuse. I'm also not saying whether the Royal Mail T&C's are right or wrong.

    However, if anyone was going to make regular use of an ongoing service, then I would advisable read their Terms & Conditions. If you haven't read the T&C's of this other website you use, then how do you not know that you are or are not breaking the law by doing what you are doing?

    Also, as you are having difficulty posting the entire content of the Royal Mail T&C's on here perhaps just making a link to the relevant page of their website would be easier ;)
     
    Upvote 0

    FE

    Free Member
    Sep 16, 2005
    418
    22
    England
    FE If Ling wasn't in the same line of business as you would you even care?

    I doubt it....

    We are in a very different business. We are Fleet Management B2B she is retail cars. We issue work to companies such as Lingcars / Brokers

    Just to state my point i originally replied to the post saying i do not think it right that a Director of a Limited company should ''boast'' how their company is taking data without paying for it.

    What any business or human does is their own concern as it is their ethics

    I made a statement and left it but Ling decided to debate her ethics of how she feels its right to do it which i disagree with. Noting abut industry its about persoanl and company ethics where we differ

    Wild Goose who is not in the same industry but i still disagree the same. so unsure as to your point to be honest

    FE
     
    Upvote 0

    Ozzy

    Founder of UKBF
    UKBF Staff
  • Feb 9, 2003
    8,402
    11
    3,542
    Northampton, UK
    bdgroup.co.uk
    However, if anyone was going to make regular use of an ongoing service, then I would advisable read their Terms & Conditions. If you haven't read the T&C's of this other website you use, then how do you not know that you are or are not breaking the law by doing what you are doing?
    Ling, this is what my specific point was in relation to. I'm saying that if you are entering into an ongoing arrangement then it would be advisable to check the T&C's because if you don't then you don't know whether you are breaking the law.
    You might not be, but it would be very advisable to make sure.
     
    Upvote 0

    FE

    Free Member
    Sep 16, 2005
    418
    22
    England
    Now, it's the "boasting" that is wrong :)

    I can say, without a shadow of doubt, I am not breaking any T and C's by boasting.

    My own T and C's say (written ages ago):

    Terms very simple:
    I provide a straightforward service, if anything is unclear, please to contact me.

    ... loads of guff which is generally rubbish ...

    You are damn lucky that the laws of England and Wales (and not of the People's Republic of China) govern these conditions of use and you agree that the English courts shall have exclusive jurisdiction in any dispute.

    Ling i choose not to live in China so not sure what that has to do with anything but the question remains


    WHY DO YOU FEEL YOU SHOULD NOT HAVE TO PAY FOR DATA THAT IS CHAREGABLE

    Why do you not answer the question?
     
    Upvote 0

    Latest Articles

    Join UK Business Forums for free business advice