By clicking “Accept All”, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyse site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts
These cookies enable our website and App to remember things such as your region or country, language, accessibility options and your preferences and settings.
Analytic cookies help website owners to understand how visitors interact with websites by collecting and reporting information anonymously.
Marketing cookies are used to track visitors across websites. The intention is to display ads that are relevant and engaging for the individual user and thereby more valuable for publishers and third party advertisers.
I'm intrigued to know how the social entrepreneurs on UKBF feel about being classed as part of the 'third sector'? I've heard from lots of people who say it's patronising and implies businesses of lower value.
The term Third Sector seems to conjure up images of half hearted businesses that are just there to save the world, or non-profit organisations, or businesses run solely by volunteers, or part time from someone's living room. This is annoying!!
I'm looking to start a Third Sector Forum, there seems to be a real lack of online information sharing resources for charities and social enterprises.
I agree that the term 'third sector' is often as vague as the term 'social enterprise' but it should not be taken to mean third rate.
Going to pick your brain here Dan...apart from UnLtd, what social enterprise funding streams do you know of?
One of the key areas for them is measuring and proving Social Return on Investment when biding for public authority tenders etc.
I am involved (charity).
Social Enterprise are a government taxation scam!
I would recommend opting for the charity route...
Interesting viewpoint but the need for social enterprises is that Charities have a restriction on their ability to trade and therefore create income. Many charities that I help are establishing social enterprises to create profit, ( they call these surpluses), that are fed back into the charity to reduce their dangerous dependency on grants and donations. the other advantage is that they can bid for commercial contracts which in many cases they can't do as a charity. It also still eaves the charity able to gain grants.I am involved (charity).
Social Enterprise are a government taxation scam!
I would recommend opting for the charity route...
Interesting viewpoint but the need for social enterprises is that Charities have a restriction on their ability to trade and therefore create income. Many charities that I help are establishing social enterprises to create profit, ( they call these surpluses), that are fed back into the charity to reduce their dangerous dependency on grants and donations. the other advantage is that they can bid for commercial contracts which in many cases they can't do as a charity. It also still eaves the charity able to gain grants.
The new form of Social Enterprise, Community Interest Companies provides the added advantage of an asset lock which protects the assets such as buildings, equipment etc.
Of course the downside of social enterprises are that they are liable for conventional business taxation including VAT where applicable, perhaps that's what NoIdea is alluding to?
Alan Briggs
I'm looking to start a Third Sector Forum, there seems to be a real lack of online information sharing resources for charities and social enterprises.
I used to work in the Voluntary Sector, in a role funded by the Gvt. Really big salary. Nice job, responsible for own workload, diary, etc. Lots of reports and justifications, though, but the salary more than made up for it. Only drawback, it was a 12 month fixed term contract, and every year there was the uncertainty that the funding would be withdrawn, and therefore no job. Of course, the funding was withdrawn, so now I am a poverty-stricken sole trader...! Life's fun, innit?!
On a more serious side, many of the positions in both the Voluntary Sector and Charity side pay silly salaries for very little work; most of it consists of attending networking meetings and funding meetings (where all the same people are, anyway, instead of working) there's a lot of talk going on and not much doing, which I had a problem with. Many of the positions are so open to abuse, it's ridiculous - I know, because towards the end of my contract, I abused it horribly, going to the gym or having my car fixed during working hours; with a little diary manipulation, it was easy. Personally, I would definitely not employ someone who has worked in these sectors without a lot of thought and background-checking. (Sorry if you are one of the good guys working for them - I was to start with.)
Very broad indeed. A charity doesn't even have to accept donations.How exactly??
Charities and Social Enterprises have very different aims. One is a self sustainable operational business and the other is a group that relies on donations to help a good cause. This is a very broad generalisation of course but you get my point.
There are many good reasons not to become a charity and I think it is a decision that should be taken very seriously by the individuals concerned. At the Community Partnership I worked at we voted against becoming a charity and incorporated as a company limited by guarantee, which was much more appropriate to the type of organisation we were. Down the road another community partnership voted the other way and became a charity. It is horses for courses really but I don't think many social enterprises would make good charities.
There is nothing to my knowledge that states that a charitable limited company by guarantee couldn't own a for profit limited company as a fund raising subsidiary.Interesting viewpoint but the need for social enterprises is that Charities have a restriction on their ability to trade and therefore create income. Many charities that I help are establishing social enterprises to create profit, ( they call these surpluses), that are fed back into the charity to reduce their dangerous dependency on grants and donations. the other advantage is that they can bid for commercial contracts which in many cases they can't do as a charity. It also still eaves the charity able to gain grants.
The new form of Social Enterprise, Community Interest Companies provides the added advantage of an asset lock which protects the assets such as buildings, equipment etc.
Of course the downside of social enterprises are that they are liable for conventional business taxation including VAT where applicable, perhaps that's what NoIdea is alluding to?
Alan Briggs
I'm in the process of setting up a Third Sector Forum, Tom from Clear Blue Design is sponsoring the site, providing technical support and hosting. Alison from The Frockery has offered her support and is going to act as an admin. David over at Nothing Does design agency is creating the logo. You'll find us at thirdsectorforums.co.uk and .com in the near future. If anyone on here is keen to get involved in anyway post on here or drop me a pm. Bruce, I'd love to hear your thoughts on it. I see the forums complimenting UKBF perfectly.
There is nothing to my knowledge that states that a charitable limited company by guarantee couldn't own a for profit limited company as a fund raising subsidiary.
Excellent website...I've been getting involved with ChooseLife up here in Lanarkshire. Suicide is one of those issues that isn't very 'fashionable' but it really needs more people speaking openly about it.
I'm intrigued to know how the social entrepreneurs on UKBF feel about being classed as part of the 'third sector'? I've heard from lots of people who say it's patronising and implies businesses of lower value.