business transfer - bad legal advice

magpie

Free Member
Jun 23, 2008
4
0
Hello everyone,
I'm new to this forum and feel a little guilty about asking for some advice on my first post but here goes;
Because of health reasons, I have recently tried to offload my rented premises and was approached by a set of 'professional business transfer agents'.
There is an absolute bar to assigning the lease so I told their representative and he asked me to bring it along at the second meeting whereupon he told me that because of new legislation I now had a right to assign it. I took this at face value and signed a contract and paid money for a marketing pack.
I have recently given the landlords notice to terminate and have been hit with a bill for selling fees off the agents because the contract stipulates I can't close the business, go bust, etc, etc. I was pretty naiive in letting him just explain the various sections of the contract without reading every clause before signing.
1)Anyway, is this contract binding as it could in effect not be performed because of this bar.
2)Also, is the agent or his representative guilty of professional negligence by giving me this advice.
3)They are arguing that he did not give this advice of course. Could he be guilty of negligence by not asking to see the lease if a court accepted that he did not give the advice? Remember that the building (as a bar/bistro) was essentially THE business.Without establishing that we had an assignable lease he could not ascertain that we had something sellable.
Another fine mess I got myself into.........
Any advice would be much appreciated.
Kind Regards
 

Antonia @limeone.com

Free Member
Jan 28, 2006
1,703
141
Chester
There is a lot going on in this thread so firstly I would need to understand a bit more:

1. Why is there a bar on assignment and how is this written in the lease? It is rare for a lease to have a bar on assignment as most are worded to provide for assignmnet on the permission of the landlord which should not be unreasonably withheld. This absolute bar appears to be unreasonable.

2. The contract with the business transfer agent appears to have misrepresentation elements, was anyone present with you when this conversation about the lease took place?
 
Upvote 0

magpie

Free Member
Jun 23, 2008
4
0
Hi, Thanks for the reply.
The lease states ' the tenant agrees.........not to assign sublet or part with the posession of the premises or any part thereof' I don't know why this is absolute but I've checked on landlords forums and people are telling me absolute means exactly what it says. It is al ease on railway premises and there are a few clauses specifically relating to railway business.
On the second point, there was nobody with us when we discussed the lease but he was adamant it would present no problem. I would guess there is no way he will put his hands up to this so it would be nice if there is some sort of onus on him to check certain things or ask certain questions in much the same way that I would expect a taxi company owner to satisfy himself that his drivers had licenses.Indeed, when I was approached by this transfer agent, their salesman asked me what sort of premises we were in - were they rented, did we own them, how long the lease was, etc,etc. The telesalesman knew that these had a bearing on whether we could transfer thebusiness/building.
Regards
 
Upvote 0

Antonia @limeone.com

Free Member
Jan 28, 2006
1,703
141
Chester
The portion of the lease you have copied is standard but elsewhere in the lease it normally outlines that permission must first be granted from the Landlord. You have not indicated in your posting whether the landlord has been approached in this instance formally to assign the lease and if so the reasons given for the refusal.

Your terms with the business transfer agent are possibly challengeable but for this to be checked out you need specific advice on the contents of the contract you have signed with them.

Certainly a taxi business is ruled by standards but business transfer businesses dealing B2B are not controlled in the same way and as a business you are expected in a court to have read the contract before entering into it. There is a much lower standard of fairness in B2B contracts than in those affecting consumers. Worth getting specific legal advice on the contract and seeing what the costs are to challenge this now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: magpie
Upvote 0

magpie

Free Member
Jun 23, 2008
4
0
Thanks again. Nothing legal seems to be simple. The fact is that we wanted out but were frightened to approach the landlord in case we 'spooked' them . The assignment bar is not conditional.At the time, someone who told us we could assign looked quite attractive - pretty dumb!
I realise that businesses are treated differently to consumers and that has always worried me.
I've just had a blindingly simple thought which no doubt will be wrong (again?) but, forgetting about apportioning blame, if a contract cannot be performed(?) because of this ban on assignment, is the contract not void anyway?
I have to try and see a solicitor soon as we are being threatened solely on the basis of the signed contract.
Wish I'd studied law at university instead of engineering!
Regards
 
Upvote 0

Antonia @limeone.com

Free Member
Jan 28, 2006
1,703
141
Chester
I suspect you will find, given the right circumstances that the landlord will assign the lease and if they have not been asked about this then it is not something you can do to void the contract even if this was not covered in the agent's contract.

In any event the contract is to market the business for sale, in most cases you will find the agents contract places the onus on the lease assignment and other legal issues as your responsibility.
 
  • Like
Reactions: magpie
Upvote 0

Latest Articles